47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Overview and recent trends of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in hepatology

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A systematic review (SR) is a research methodology that involves a comprehensive search for and analysis of relevant studies on a specific topic. A strict and objective research process is conducted that comprises a systematic and comprehensive literature search in accordance with predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria, and an assessment of the risk of bias of the selected literature. SRs require a multidisciplinary approach that necessitates cooperation with clinical experts, methodologists, other experts, and statisticians. A meta-analysis (MA) is a statistical method of quantitatively synthesizing data, where possible, from the primary literature selected for the SR. Review articles differ from SRs in that they lack a systematic methodology such as a literature search, selection of studies according to strict criteria, assessment of risk bias, and synthesis of the study results. The importance of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in the decision-making for public policy has recently been increasing thanks to the realization that it should be based on scientific research data. SRs and MAs are essential for EBM strategy and evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. This review addresses the current trends in SRs and MAs in the field of hepatology via a search of recently published articles in the Cochrane Library and Ovid-MEDLINE.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Global epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection: new estimates of age-specific antibody to HCV seroprevalence.

          In efforts to inform public health decision makers, the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors 2010 (GBD2010) Study aims to estimate the burden of disease using available parameters. This study was conducted to collect and analyze available prevalence data to be used for estimating the hepatitis C virus (HCV) burden of disease. In this systematic review, antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) seroprevalence data from 232 articles were pooled to estimate age-specific seroprevalence curves in 1990 and 2005, and to produce age-standardized prevalence estimates for each of 21 GBD regions using a model-based meta-analysis. This review finds that globally the prevalence and number of people with anti-HCV has increased from 2.3% (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 2.1%-2.5%) to 2.8% (95% UI: 2.6%-3.1%) and >122 million to >185 million between 1990 and 2005. Central and East Asia and North Africa/Middle East are estimated to have high prevalence (>3.5%); South and Southeast Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, Andean, Central, and Southern Latin America, Caribbean, Oceania, Australasia, and Central, Eastern, and Western Europe have moderate prevalence (1.5%-3.5%); whereas Asia Pacific, Tropical Latin America, and North America have low prevalence (<1.5%). The high prevalence of global HCV infection necessitates renewed efforts in primary prevention, including vaccine development, as well as new approaches to secondary and tertiary prevention to reduce the burden of chronic liver disease and to improve survival for those who already have evidence of liver disease. Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A systematic review of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic and prognostic variability.

            Selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma are candidates to receive potentially curative treatments, such as hepatic resection or liver transplantation, but nevertheless there is a high risk of tumor recurrence. Microvascular invasion is a histological feature of hepatocellular carcinoma related to aggressive biological behavior. We systematically reviewed 20 observational studies that addressed the prognostic impact of microvascular invasion, either after liver transplantation or resection. Outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival. In liver transplantation, the presence of microvascular invasion shortened disease-free survival at 3 years (relative risk (RR)=3.41 [2.05-5.7]; five studies, n=651) and overall survival both at 3 years (RR=2.41 [1.72-3.37]; five studies, n=1,938) and 5 years (RR=2.29 [1.85-2.83]; six studies, n=2,003). After liver resection, microvascular invasion impacted disease-free survival at 3 and 5 years (RR=1.82 [1.61-2.07] and RR=1.51 [1.29-1.77]; four studies, n=1,501 for both comparisons). However inter/intraobserver variability in reporting and the lack of definition and grading of microvascular invasion has led to great heterogeneity in evaluating this histological feature in hepatocellular carcinoma. Thus, there is an urgent need to clarify this issue, because determining prognosis and response to therapy have become important in the current management of hepatocellular carcinoma. In this systematic review, we summarize the diagnostic and prognostic data concerning microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma and present a basis for consensus on its definition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effects of probiotics on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis.

              To investigate the relationship between the gut-liver axis and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of probiotic therapy in NAFLD. We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and Chinese Biomedicine Database for all relevant randomized controlled trials on probiotics in patients with NAFLD/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). A statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Four randomized trials involving 134 NAFLD/NASH patients were included. The results showed that probiotic therapy significantly decreased alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total-cholesterol (T-chol), high density lipoprotein (HDL), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) [ALT: weighted mean difference (WMD) -23.71, 95%CI: -33.46--13.95, P < 0.00001; AST: WMD -19.77, 95%CI: -32.55--7.00, P = 0.002; T-chol: WMD -0.28, 95%CI: -0.55--0.01, P = 0.04; HDL: WMD -0.09, 95%CI: -0.16-0.01, P = 0.03; TNF-α: WMD -0.32, 95%CI: -0.48--0.17, P < 0.0001; HOMA-IR: WMD -0.46, 95%CI: -0.73--0.19, P = 0.0008]. However, the use of probiotics was not associated with changes in body mass index (BMI), glucose (GLU) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) (BMI: WMD 0.05, 95%CI: -0.18-0.29, P = 0.64; GLU: WMD 0.05, 95%CI: -0.25-0.35, P = 0.76; LDL: WMD -0.38, 95%CI: -0.78-0.02, P = 0.06). Probiotic therapies can reduce liver aminotransferases, total-cholesterol, TNF-α and improve insulin resistance in NAFLD patients. Modulation of the gut microbiota represents a new treatment for NAFLD.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Mol Hepatol
                Clin Mol Hepatol
                CMH
                Clinical and Molecular Hepatology
                The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver
                2287-2728
                2287-285X
                June 2014
                30 June 2014
                : 20
                : 2
                : 137-150
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Nursing, Keimyung University College of Nursing, Daegu, Korea.
                [2 ]Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: Gaeun Kim. Department of Nursing, Keimyung University College of Nursing, 1095 Dalgubelo-daero, Daegu 704-701, Korea. Tel. +82-53-580-3920, Fax. +82-53-580-3916, mjkim0325@ 123456hanmail.net
                Co-Corresponding author: Soon Koo Baik. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine, 162 Ilsan-ro, Wonju 220-701, Korea. Tel. +82-33-741-1223, Fax. +82-33-741-1228, baiksk@ 123456yonsei.ac.kr
                Article
                10.3350/cmh.2014.20.2.137
                4099328
                25032179
                5ab5a58c-3b01-4501-a977-33d08b7ec539
                Copyright © 2014 by The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 14 May 2014
                : 29 May 2014
                Categories
                Review

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                meta-analysis,systematic review,hepatology
                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                meta-analysis, systematic review, hepatology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content343

                Cited by9

                Most referenced authors1,176