9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using farmers' local knowledge of tree provision of ecosystem services to strengthen the emergence of coffee-agroforestry landscapes in southwest China

      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , * , 4 , 5 , 1 , 3
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Intensive monoculture coffee farms quickly expanded in Yunnan Province in the 1990’s and 2000’s. In 2012, local authorities in Pu’er and Xishuangbanna Prefectures, the main coffee producing centre in the province, initiated a large-scale conversion program of these farms towards coffee-agroforestry systems to promote “ecologically-friendly coffee”. Shade tree inventories and household interviews were conducted in these two prefectures to characterize coffee farms and the Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) of farmers on the provision of ecosystem services by associated tree species. This study on newly emerging coffee farming systems revealed a high level of tree species diversity at both farm and landscape levels despite the previous dominance of intensive coffee monoculture and the large-scale distribution of a limited number of shade tree species by the government. 162 tree species were encountered during farm inventories, out of which the community of coffee farmers was able to rank 30 against 9 ecosystem services and disservices. This study reveals that this LEK is a type of hybrid knowledge that still relies mostly on traditional knowledge of tree species combined with experience acquired from newly-implemented coffee-agroforestry practices. This study also pointed out knowledge gaps regarding the impact of mature trees on coffee yield, coffee quality and pest control. The participatory approach resulted in the identification of non-promoted species with a high potential to provide locally relevant ecosystem services in coffee-agroforestry systems. These results lead to the upgrade of an online tool ( www.shadetreeadvice.org) which allows extension services generating lists of recommended shade tree species tailored to the local ecological context and individual farmers’ needs. This tool will benefit farmers’ livelihood, support landscape health and contribute to the sustainability of the emerging Yunnan coffee agriculture sector.

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses.

          "Landscape approaches" seek to provide tools and concepts for allocating and managing land to achieve social, economic, and environmental objectives in areas where agriculture, mining, and other productive land uses compete with environmental and biodiversity goals. Here we synthesize the current consensus on landscape approaches. This is based on published literature and a consensus-building process to define good practice and is validated by a survey of practitioners. We find the landscape approach has been refined in response to increasing societal concerns about environment and development tradeoffs. Notably, there has been a shift from conservation-orientated perspectives toward increasing integration of poverty alleviation goals. We provide 10 summary principles to support implementation of a landscape approach as it is currently interpreted. These principles emphasize adaptive management, stakeholder involvement, and multiple objectives. Various constraints are recognized, with institutional and governance concerns identified as the most severe obstacles to implementation. We discuss how these principles differ from more traditional sectoral and project-based approaches. Although no panacea, we see few alternatives that are likely to address landscape challenges more effectively than an approach circumscribed by the principles outlined here.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            China's ecological rehabilitation: Unprecedented efforts, dramatic impacts, and requisite policies

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Botanical Knowledge and its Differentiation by Age, Gender and Ethnicity in Southwestern Niger

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Funding acquisitionRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                20 September 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 9
                : e0204046
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China
                [2 ] University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
                [3 ] World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), East and Central Asia Regional Office, Kunming, China
                [4 ] CIRAD, UMR Eco&Sols, Université Montpellier, Montpellier, France
                [5 ] World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Vietnam Country Office, Southeast Asia Regional Program, Hanoi, Vietnam
                Chinese Academy of Forestry, CHINA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6210-1101
                Article
                PONE-D-18-11494
                10.1371/journal.pone.0204046
                6147441
                30235262
                5ad14b4a-9a43-4618-bea3-3f5d1d8104c0
                © 2018 Rigal et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 6 May 2018
                : 31 August 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 3, Pages: 18
                Funding
                Funded by: Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
                Award ID: QYZDY-SSW-SMC014
                Award Recipient :
                This research was funded through a PhD program by the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Kunming Institute of Botany, with additional financial support from the CGIAR program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA), and supported by Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS, Grant No. QYZDY-SSW-SMC014. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Trees
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Farms
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Agricultural Workers
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Organisms
                Eukaryota
                Plants
                Fruits
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecological Metrics
                Species Diversity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Agroecology
                Agroforests
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Agroecology
                Agroforests
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Agroecology
                Agroforests
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Agriculture
                Forestry
                Agroforests
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Ethnicities
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Ecology and Environmental Sciences
                Ecology
                Ecosystems
                Custom metadata

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article