2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Gendered contexts: masculinity, knowledge, and attitudes toward biotechnology.

      1
      Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Research into the public understanding of science has revealed that the effect of scientific knowledge on attitudes toward science is contextualized by gender; however there has not yet been an account of how gender contextualizes knowledge. This paper investigates how gender identification affects attitudes toward science, and tempers the effects of scientific knowledge on attitudes toward science. Utilizing data from the Eurobarometer 52.1, it is predicted that when males perceive a threat to their masculinity (as measured by a perceived threat to their financial security) they will become more likely to be aversive to biotechnology, and that increased levels of perceived threat will reduce the effects of knowledge on attitudes toward biotechnology. Moreover, it is predicted that these effects will be smaller than their female counterparts. All predictions are affirmed.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Public Underst Sci
          Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
          SAGE Publications
          0963-6625
          0963-6625
          May 2011
          : 20
          : 3
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. rms386@psu.edu
          Article
          10.1177/0963662509344272
          21796882
          5ae593db-1262-4f4d-b460-d7f04bd2af15
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article