38
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Stockholm experience: interhospital transports on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

      research-article
        , , ,
      Critical Care
      BioMed Central

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          In severe respiratory and/or circulatory failure, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be a lifesaving procedure. Specialized departments provide ECMO, and these patients often have to be transferred for treatment. Conventional transportation is hazardous, and deaths have been described. Only a few centers have performed more than 100 ECMO transports. To date, our mobile ECMO teams have performed more than 700 transports with patients on ECMO since 1996. We describe 4 consecutive years (2010–2013) of 322 national and international ECMO transports and report adverse events.

          Methods

          Data were retrieved from our local databases. Neonatal, pediatric and adult patients were transported, predominantly with refractory severe respiratory failure.

          Results

          The patients were cannulated in 282 of the transports, and ECMO was started in these patients at the referring hospital and then they were transported to our ECMO intensive care unit. In 40 cases, the patient was already on ECMO. Of the transports, 60 % were by aircraft, and the distances varied from 6.9 to 13,447 km. In about 27.3 % of the transports, adverse events occurred. Of these, the most common were either patient-related (22 %) or equipment-related (5.3 %). No deaths occurred during transport, and transferred patients exhibited the same mortality rate as in-hospital patients.

          Conclusions

          Long- and short-distance interhospital transports on ECMO can be safely performed. A myriad of complications can occur, but the mortality risk is very low. The staff involved should be highly competent in intensive care, ECMO physiology and physics, cannulation, intensive care transport and air transport medicine. They should also be skilled in recognition of risk factors involved in these patients.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0994-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Position paper for the organization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for acute respiratory failure in adult patients.

          The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for severe acute respiratory failure (ARF) in adults is growing rapidly given recent advances in technology, even though there is controversy regarding the evidence justifying its use. Because ECMO is a complex, high-risk, and costly modality, at present it should be conducted in centers with sufficient experience, volume, and expertise to ensure it is used safely. This position paper represents the consensus opinion of an international group of physicians and associated health-care workers who have expertise in therapeutic modalities used in the treatment of patients with severe ARF, with a focus on ECMO. The aim of this paper is to provide physicians, ECMO center directors and coordinators, hospital directors, health-care organizations, and regional, national, and international policy makers a description of the optimal approach to organizing ECMO programs for ARF in adult patients. Importantly, this will help ensure that ECMO is delivered safely and proficiently, such that future observational and randomized clinical trials assessing this technique may be performed by experienced centers under homogeneous and optimal conditions. Given the need for further evidence, we encourage restraint in the widespread use of ECMO until we have a better appreciation for both the potential clinical applications and the optimal techniques for performing ECMO.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Emergency circulatory support in refractory cardiogenic shock patients in remote institutions: a pilot study (the cardiac-RESCUE program).

            Temporary circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is often the only alternative for supporting patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS). In practice, this strategy is limited to a small minority of patients hospitalized in tertiary-care centres with ECMO programs. The cardiac-RESCUE program was designed to test the feasibility of providing circulatory support distant from specialized ECMO centres, for RCS patients in remote locations. From January 2005 to December 2009, hospitals without ECMO facilities throughout the Greater Paris area were invited to participate. One hundred and four RCS cases were assessed and 87 consecutively eligible patients (mean age 46 ± 15 years, 41% following cardiac arrest) had ECMO support instituted locally and were enrolled into the program. Local initiation of ECMO support allowed successful transfer to the tertiary-care centre in 75 patients. Of these, 32 patients survived to hospital discharge [overall survival rate 36.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 27.4-46.2]. Independent predictors for in-hospital mortality included initiation of ECMO during cardiopulmonary resuscitation [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.81, 95% CI 2.25-10.30, P < 0.001] and oligo-anuria (HR = 2.48, 95% CI 1.29-4.76, P = 0.006). After adjusting for other confounding factors, in-hospital mortality was not statistically different from that of 123 consecutive patients who received ECMO at our institution during the same period (odds ratio 1.48, 95% CI 0.72-3.00, P = 0.29). Offering local ECMO support appears feasible in a majority of RCS patients hospitalized in remote hospitals. In this otherwise lethal situation, our pilot experience suggests that over one-third of such patients can survive to hospital discharge.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Pediatric and neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does center volume impact mortality?*.

              Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, an accepted rescue therapy for refractory cardiopulmonary failure, requires a complex multidisciplinary approach and advanced technology. Little is known about the relationship between a center's case volume and patient mortality. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between hospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation annual volume and in-hospital mortality and assess if a minimum hospital volume could be recommended. Retrospective cohort study. A retrospective cohort admitted to children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System database from 2004 to 2011 supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was identified. Indications were assigned based on patient age (neonatal vs pediatric), diagnosis, and procedure codes. Average hospital annual volume was defined as 0-19, 20-49, or greater than or equal to 50 cases per year. Maximum likelihood estimates were used to assess minimum annual case volume. A total of 7,322 pediatric patients aged 0-18 were supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and had an indication assigned. None. Average hospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation volume ranged from 1 to 58 cases per year. Overall mortality was 43% but differed significantly by indication. After adjustment for case-mix, complexity of cardiac surgery, and year of treatment, patients treated at medium-volume centers (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98) and high-volume centers (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89) had significantly lower odds of death compared with those treated at low-volume centers. The minimum annual case load most significantly associated with lower mortality was 22 (95% CI, 22-28). Pediatric centers with low extracorporeal membrane oxygenation average annual case volume had significantly higher mortality and a minimum volume of 22 cases per year was associated with improved mortality. We suggest that this threshold should be evaluated by additional study.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +46-8-517 78066 , lars.broman@karolinska.se
                +46-8-517 78023 , bernhard.holzgraefe@karolinska.se
                +46-8-517 78000 , kenneth.palmer@karolinska.se
                +46-8-517 77696 , bjorn.frenckner@karolinska.se
                Journal
                Crit Care
                Critical Care
                BioMed Central (London )
                1364-8535
                1466-609X
                9 July 2015
                9 July 2015
                2015
                : 19
                : 1
                : 278
                Affiliations
                [ ]ECMO Center Karolinska, Karolinska University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
                [ ]Department of Pediatric Surgery, Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, 171 76 Stockholm Sweden
                Article
                994
                10.1186/s13054-015-0994-6
                4498561
                26160033
                5aefa9c8-80c4-4ab2-861c-49154c2ee1a4
                © Broman et al. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 29 December 2014
                : 24 June 2015
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Emergency medicine & Trauma
                Emergency medicine & Trauma

                Comments

                Comment on this article