0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Median Raphe Stimulation and Sham Procedures Inhibit the LH Surge

      Neuroendocrinology

      S. Karger AG

      Median raphe nucleus, Electrolytic stimulation, Ovulation, LH surge

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Acute electrolytic stimulation of the median raphe (MR) nucleus (MR Stim) between 13:00 and 16:00 h on proestrus blocked ovulation in 10 of the 21 rats tested, whereas all sham-treated (MR Sham, no current) animals ovulated normally (n = 12). MR Stim at 16:00 h on proestrus in individual cannulated rats ‘turned off’ the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in all animals tested. Unexpectedly, MR Sham treatment also abruptly inhibited the LH surge, although all animals ovulated. Manipulations associated with acute surgical procedures (puncture of the dura mater, ether anesthesia alone) were also found to inhibit the LH surge, with the magnitude of LH inhibition directly related to the severity of the operative procedures performed (p< 0.025). The results suggest (1) that inhibition of ovulation following MR stimulation can be attributed to a response to stress qualitatively similar but more severe than that experienced by the MR sham group, and (2) that inhibitory inputs to the ovulatory LH release mechanism cannot be studied using acute surgical procedures.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          NEN
          Neuroendocrinology
          10.1159/issn.0028-3835
          Neuroendocrinology
          S. Karger AG
          0028-3835
          1423-0194
          1979
          1979
          26 March 2008
          : 28
          : 6
          : 358-370
          Affiliations
          Department of Pharmacology, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy, Boston, Mass., and Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
          Article
          122884 Neuroendocrinology 1979;28:358–370
          10.1159/000122884
          572490
          © 1979 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 13
          Categories
          Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article