10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Morphine‐induced respiratory depression is independent of β‐arrestin2 signalling

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background and Purpose

          GPCRs can signal through both G proteins and β‐arrestin2. For the μ‐opioid receptor, early experimental evidence from a single study suggested that G protein signalling mediates analgesia, whereas β‐arrestin2 signalling mediates respiratory depression and constipation. Consequently, for more than a decade, much research effort has been focused on developing biased μ‐opioid agonists that preferentially target G protein signalling over β‐arrestin signalling, as it was believed that such drugs would be analgesics devoid of respiratory depressant activity. However, the prototypical compounds that have been developed based on this concept have so far failed in clinical and preclinical development.

          Experimental Approach

          The present study was set up to re‐examine opioid‐induced respiratory depression in β‐arrestin2 knockout mice. To this end, a consortium was formed consisting of three different laboratories located in different countries to evaluate independently opioid‐induced respiratory depression.

          Key Results

          Our consensus results unequivocally demonstrate that the prototypical μ‐opioid agonist morphine (3.75–100 mg·kg −1 s.c. or 3–30 mg·kg −1 i.p.) as well as the potent opioid fentanyl (0.05–0.35 mg·kg −1 s.c.) do indeed induce respiratory depression and constipation in β‐arrestin2 knockout mice in a dose‐dependent manner indistinguishable from that observed in wild‐type mice.

          Conclusion and Implications

          Our findings do not support the original suggestion that β‐arrestin2 signalling plays a key role in opioid‐induced respiratory depression and call into question the concept of developing G protein‐biased μ‐opioid receptor agonists as a strategy for the development of safer opioid analgesic drugs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20: G protein‐coupled receptors

          The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2019/20 is the fourth in this series of biennial publications. The Concise Guide provides concise overviews of the key properties of nearly 1800 human drug targets with an emphasis on selective pharmacology (where available), plus links to the open access knowledgebase source of drug targets and their ligands (http://www.guidetopharmacology.org/), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. Although the Concise Guide represents approximately 400 pages, the material presented is substantially reduced compared to information and links presented on the website. It provides a permanent, citable, point‐in‐time record that will survive database updates. The full contents of this section can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.14748. G protein‐coupled receptors are one of the six major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. The landscape format of the Concise Guide is designed to facilitate comparison of related targets from material contemporary to mid‐2019, and supersedes data presented in the 2017/18, 2015/16 and 2013/14 Concise Guides and previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in close conjunction with the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification (NC‐IUPHAR), therefore, providing official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mu-opioid receptor desensitization by beta-arrestin-2 determines morphine tolerance but not dependence.

            Morphine is a powerful pain reliever, but also a potent inducer of tolerance and dependence. The development of opiate tolerance occurs on continued use of the drug such that the amount of drug required to elicit pain relief must be increased to compensate for diminished responsiveness. In many systems, decreased responsiveness to agonists has been correlated with the desensitization of G-protein-coupled receptors. In vitro evidence indicates that this process involves phosphorylation of G-protein-coupled receptors and subsequent binding of regulatory proteins called beta-arrestins. Using a knockout mouse lacking beta-arrestin-2 (beta arr2-/-), we have assessed the contribution of desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor to the development of morphine antinociceptive tolerance and the subsequent onset of physical dependence. Here we show that in mice lacking beta-arrestin-2, desensitization of the mu-opioid receptor does not occur after chronic morphine treatment, and that these animals fail to develop antinociceptive tolerance. However, the deletion of beta-arrestin-2 does not prevent the chronic morphine-induced up-regulation of adenylyl cyclase activity, a cellular marker of dependence, and the mutant mice still become physically dependent on the drug.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Goals and practicalities of immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry: A guide for submission to the British Journal of Pharmacology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                e.kelly@bristol.ac.uk
                graeme.henderson@bristol.ac.uk
                mac.christie@sydney.edu.au
                stefan.schulz@med.uni-jena.de
                Journal
                Br J Pharmacol
                Br. J. Pharmacol
                10.1111/(ISSN)1476-5381
                BPH
                British Journal of Pharmacology
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0007-1188
                1476-5381
                17 February 2020
                July 2020
                17 February 2020
                : 177
                : 13 ( doiID: 10.1111/bph.v177.13 )
                : 2923-2931
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology Jena University Hospital, Friedrich‐Schiller‐University Jena Germany
                [ 2 ] Discipline of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences University of Sydney Sydney NSW Australia
                [ 3 ] School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience University of Bristol Bristol UK
                [ 4 ] Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology University of Bath Bath UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Eamonn Kelly and Graeme Henderson, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

                Email: e.kelly@ 123456bristol.ac.uk ; graeme.henderson@ 123456bristol.ac.uk

                Macdonald J. Christie, Discipline of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

                Email: mac.christie@ 123456sydney.edu.au

                Stefan Schulz, Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich‐Schiller‐University, 07747 Jena, Germany.

                Email: stefan.schulz@ 123456med.uni-jena.de

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1320-6505
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3859-8506
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9183-3993
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6050-0048
                Article
                BPH15004 2019-BJP-0456-RP.R2
                10.1111/bph.15004
                7280004
                32052419
                5b430e3e-e7ff-4159-9e5e-c3d43a879e73
                © 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Pharmacological Society

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 24 April 2019
                : 03 December 2019
                : 17 January 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 0, Pages: 9, Words: 6144
                Funding
                Funded by: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft , open-funder-registry 10.13039/501100001659;
                Award ID: SFB/TR166‐TPC5
                Award ID: SCHU924/10‐3
                Award ID: SCHU924/18‐1
                Award ID: SCHU924/11‐3
                Funded by: National Institute of Health (USA)
                Award ID: RO1DA036975
                Funded by: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
                Award ID: APP1072113
                Award ID: 1045964
                Categories
                Research Paper
                Research Papers
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                July 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.8.4 mode:remove_FC converted:08.06.2020

                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine
                Pharmacology & Pharmaceutical medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article