32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Higgs portal, fermionic dark matter, and a Standard Model like Higgs at 125 GeV

      Preprint
      , ,

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We show that fermionic dark matter (DM) which communicates with the Standard Model (SM) via the Higgs portal is a viable scenario, even if a SM-like Higgs is found at around 125 GeV. Using effective field theory we show that for DM with a mass in the range from about 60 GeV to 2 TeV the Higgs portal needs to be parity violating in order to be in agreement with direct detection searches. For parity conserving interactions we identify two distinct options that remain viable: a resonant Higgs portal, and an indirect Higgs portal. We illustrate both possibilities using a simple renormalizable toy model.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Can WIMP dark matter overcome the nightmare scenario?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Breit-Wigner enhancement of dark matter annihilation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Missing Energy Signatures of Dark Matter at the LHC

              We use ATLAS and CMS searches in the mono-jet + missing energy and mono-photon + missing energy final state to set limits on the couplings of dark matter to quarks and gluons. Working in an effective field theory framework we compare several existing mono-jet analyses and find that searches with high p_T cuts are more sensitive to dark matter. We constrain the suppression scale of the effective dark matter-Standard Model interactions, and convert these limits into bounds on the cross sections relevant to direct and indirect detection. We find that, for certain types of operators, in particular spin-independent dark matter-gluon couplings and spin-dependent dark matter-quark couplings, LHC constraints from the mono-jet channel are competitive with, or superior to, limits from direct searches up to dark matter masses of order 1 TeV. Comparing to indirect searches, we exclude, at 90% C.L., dark matter annihilating to quarks with the annihilation cross section of a thermal relic for masses below ~ 15-70 GeV, depending on the Lorentz structure of the effective couplings. Mono-photon limits are somewhat weaker than mono-jet bounds, but still provide an important cross check in the case of a discovery in mono-jets. We also discuss the possibility that dark matter--Standard Model interactions at LHC energies cannot be described by effective operators, in which case we find that constraints can become either significantly stronger, or considerably weaker, depending on the mass and width of the intermediate particle. We also discuss the special case of dark matter coupling to the Higgs boson, and we show that searches for invisible Higgs decays would provide superior sensitivity, particularly for a light Higgs mass and light dark matter.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                09 March 2012
                2012-07-09
                Article
                10.1016/j.physletb.2012.07.017
                1203.2064
                5b615850-3576-4daf-8a88-28ad80b33ac3

                http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

                History
                Custom metadata
                UCHEP-12-01
                16 pages, 4 figures; references and discussion of Sommerfeld effect added; matches published version
                hep-ph

                Comments

                Comment on this article