3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Report of trisomy 2q34-qter and monosomy 4q35.2-qter in a child with mild dysmorphic syndrome and karyotype 46,XY,der(4)t(2;4)(q34;q35.2)pat

      case-report

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Concomitant trisomy 2q3 and monosomy 4q3 have been rarely reported. Pure trisomy 2q3 has been associated with microcephaly, hypertelorism, low-set ears, micrognathia, visceral abnormalities, and growth retardation. Monosomy 4q3 includes a wide variety of dysmorphic features such an abnormal skull shape, hypertelorism, Pierre Robin sequence, short nose with abnormal bridge, fifth finger clinodactyly, congenital heart, and genitourinary defects, in addition to intellectual disability, developmental delay, and hypotonia, but more distal deletions involving 4q34-qter may result in milder phenotypes. Here, we present a child with a mild dysmorphic syndrome, resulted of a duplication 2q34-qter and a deletion 4q35.2-qter inherited of his father.

          Case presentation

          We report a child, who at birth presented hypotonia, dysmorphism, and bilateral cryptorchidism. At 2 years and 9 month of age he showed brachycephaly, narrow forehead, bilateral frontoparietal hypertrichosis, down slanting palpebral fissures, sparse eyebrows, sparse short eyelashes, hypertelorism, depressed nasal root, broad nasal bridge, bulbous nasal tip, prominent colummela, broad nasal ala, smooth filtrum, high arched palate, thin upper lips, and ears rotated backwards. He also showed telethelia, hypertrichosis from dorsal to the sacral region, hands with clinodactyly and hypoplasia of the terminal phalanx of the fifth finger, and broad thumbs, broad first toes, and right cryptorchidism. A chromosomal study revealed a karyotype 46,XY,der(4)t(2;4)(q34;q35.2), while an array comparative genomic hybridization showed a 31.12 Mb duplication of the chromosome 2q34-q37.3 and a 1.49 Mb deletion in the chromosome 4q35.2.

          Conclusions

          To our knowledge, only four families with translocation t(2;4) have been reported, two of them involving t(2q;4q), but the breakpoints involved in our patient have not been previously observed. The genomic imbalance in this patient was a duplication of 318 genes of the region 2q34-q37.3 and a deletion of 7 genes of 4q35.2. We discuss difficulty to assign specific congenital abnormalities to these duplicated/deleted regions and include some cases with terminal deletions of 4q with normal or just mildly detectable phenotypic effects.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Subtelomere FISH analysis of 11 688 cases: an evaluation of the frequency and pattern of subtelomere rearrangements in individuals with developmental disabilities.

          Subtelomere fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis has increasingly been used as an adjunct to routine cytogenetic testing in order to detect small rearrangements. Previous reports have estimated an overall abnormality rate of 6%, with a range of 2-29% because of different inclusion criteria. This study presents data compiled from 11 688 cases referred for subtelomere FISH testing in three clinical cytogenetic laboratories. In this study population, the detection rate for clinically significant subtelomere abnormalities was approximately 2.5%, with an additional 0.5% detection of presumed familial variants. Approximately half of the clinically significant abnormalities identified were terminal deletions, the majority of which were de novo. Most of the remaining cases were unbalanced translocations between two chromosomes or two arms of the same chromosome. Approximately 60% of the unbalanced translocations were inherited from a parent carrying a balanced form of the rearrangement. Other abnormalities identified included tandem duplications, apparently balanced translocations, partial deletions, and insertions. Interestingly, 9 cases (0.08%) were found to have interstitial deletions of non-telomeric control loci, either BCR on 22q or PML on 15q. The most common clinically significant imbalances found were deletions of 1p, 22q, 4p, 9q, 8p, 2q and 20p. The most common familial variants were a deletion or duplication of 10q, deletion of 4q, deletion of Yq, and duplication of X/Yp onto Xq. This study of subtelomere rearrangements is a 20 fold increase in number over the previously reported largest study and represents an unbiased analysis of subtelomere rearrangements in a large, unselected patient population.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Identification of chromosome abnormalities in subtelomeric regions by microarray analysis: a study of 5,380 cases.

            Subtelomeric imbalances are a significant cause of congenital disorders. Screening for these abnormalities has traditionally utilized GTG-banding analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) is a relatively new technology that can identify microscopic and submicroscopic chromosomal imbalances. It has been proposed that an array with extended coverage at subtelomeric regions could characterize subtelomeric aberrations more efficiently in a single experiment. The targeted arrays for chromosome microarray analysis (CMA), developed by Baylor College of Medicine, have on average 12 BAC/PAC clones covering 10 Mb of each of the 41 subtelomeric regions. We screened 5,380 consecutive clinical patients using CMA. The most common reasons for referral included developmental delay (DD), and/or mental retardation (MR), dysmorphic features (DF), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), seizure disorders (SD), and autistic, or other behavioral abnormalities. We found pathogenic rearrangements at subtelomeric regions in 236 patients (4.4%). Among these patients, 103 had a deletion, 58 had a duplication, 44 had an unbalanced translocation, and 31 had a complex rearrangement. The detection rates varied among patients with a normal karyotype analysis (2.98%), with an abnormal karyotype analysis (43.4%), and with an unavailable or no karyotype analysis (3.16%). Six patients out of 278 with a prior normal subtelomere-FISH analysis showed an abnormality including an interstitial deletion, two terminal deletions, two interstitial duplications, and a terminal duplication. In conclusion, genomic imbalances at subtelomeric regions contribute significantly to congenital disorders. Targeted array-CGH with extended coverage (up to 10 Mb) of subtelomeric regions will enhance the detection of subtelomeric imbalances, especially for submicroscopic imbalances. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genotype-phenotype analysis of 4q deletion syndrome: proposal of a critical region.

              Chromosome 4q deletion syndrome (4q- syndrome) is a rare condition, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 100,000. Although variable, the clinical spectrum commonly includes craniofacial, developmental, digital, skeletal, and cardiac involvement. Data on the genotype-phenotype correlation within the 4q arm are limited. We present detailed clinical and genetic information by array CGH on 20 patients with 4q deletions. We identified a patient who has a ∼465 kb deletion (186,770,069-187,234,800, hg18 coordinates) in 4q35.1 with all clinical features for 4q deletion syndrome except for developmental delay, suggesting that this is a critical region for this condition and a specific gene responsible for orofacial clefts and congenital heart defects resides in this region. Since the patients with terminal deletions all had cleft palate, our results provide further evidence that a gene associated with clefts is located on the terminal segment of 4q. By comparing and contrasting our patients' genetic information and clinical features, we found significant genotype-phenotype correlations at a single gene level linking specific phenotypes to individual genes. Based on these data, we constructed a hypothetical partial phenotype-genotype map for chromosome 4q which includes BMP3, SEC31A, MAPK10, SPARCL1, DMP1, IBSP, PKD2, GRID2, PITX2, NEUROG2, ANK2, FGF2, HAND2, and DUX4 genes. Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                veronicapicos@uas.edu.mx
                Journal
                Mol Cytogenet
                Mol Cytogenet
                Molecular Cytogenetics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1755-8166
                19 May 2020
                19 May 2020
                2020
                : 13
                : 17
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.441241.6, ISNI 0000 0001 2187 037X, Facultad de Medicina e Ingeniería en Sistemas Computacionales de Matamoros, , Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas, ; Matamoros, Tamps., Mexico
                [2 ]Servicio de Medicina Genética, Hospital General de Culiacán, Culiacán, Sin., Mexico
                [3 ]GRID grid.419157.f, ISNI 0000 0001 1091 9430, Unidad Médica Familiar 11, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS), ; Villa Juárez, Navolato, Sin., Mexico
                [4 ]GRID grid.412863.a, ISNI 0000 0001 2192 9271, Laboratorio de Genética y Biología Molecular, Posgrado en Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Ciencias Químico Biológicas, , Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, ; Culiacán, Sin., Mexico
                [5 ]GRID grid.412863.a, ISNI 0000 0001 2192 9271, Facultad de Medicina, , Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, ; Culiacán, Sin., Mexico
                [6 ]Laboratorio de Biomedicina y Biología Molecular, Unidad Académica de Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Universidad Politécnica de Sinaloa, Mazatlán, Sin., Mexico
                [7 ]GRID grid.412863.a, ISNI 0000 0001 2192 9271, Facultad de Odontología, , Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, ; Culiacán, Sin., Mexico
                [8 ]GRID grid.412863.a, ISNI 0000 0001 2192 9271, Laboratorio de Genética, Facultad de Medicina, , Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, ; Culiacán, Sin., Mexico
                Article
                484
                10.1186/s13039-020-00484-4
                7236877
                5b63861a-4eb0-43d4-adc5-395f63129474
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 1 February 2020
                : 27 March 2020
                Categories
                Case Report
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Genetics
                duplication 2q34-qter,deletion 4q35.2-qter,der(4)t(2;4)(q34;q35.2),acgh
                Genetics
                duplication 2q34-qter, deletion 4q35.2-qter, der(4)t(2;4)(q34;q35.2), acgh

                Comments

                Comment on this article