23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Adjunctive rifampicin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (ARREST): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

      research-article
      , Prof, FRCP a , b , * , , PhD a , , MSc c , , FRCP d , , MBChB e , , FRCP f , , FRCPath g , , Prof, MD h , , FRCPath i , , MSc c , , BSc c , , MD j , , MD k , , PhD l , , MD m , , Prof, FRCP n , , MD o , , MD p , , FRCPath q , , FRCP r , , FRCPath a , , MBBS a , , FRCPath s , , MD t , , MD u , , MD v , , MD w , , MD x , , FRCP y , , MD z , , MSc c , , MD aa , , MD ab , , MD ac , , Prof, PhD ad , , Prof, FRCPath ae , , Prof, PhD a , c , United Kingdom Clinical Infection Research Group (UKCIRG)
      Lancet (London, England)
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Background

          Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is a common cause of severe community-acquired and hospital-acquired infection worldwide. We tested the hypothesis that adjunctive rifampicin would reduce bacteriologically confirmed treatment failure or disease recurrence, or death, by enhancing early S aureus killing, sterilising infected foci and blood faster, and reducing risks of dissemination and metastatic infection.

          Methods

          In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults (≥18 years) with S aureus bacteraemia who had received ≤96 h of active antibiotic therapy were recruited from 29 UK hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computer-generated sequential randomisation list to receive 2 weeks of adjunctive rifampicin (600 mg or 900 mg per day according to weight, oral or intravenous) versus identical placebo, together with standard antibiotic therapy. Randomisation was stratified by centre. Patients, investigators, and those caring for the patients were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was time to bacteriologically confirmed treatment failure or disease recurrence, or death (all-cause), from randomisation to 12 weeks, adjudicated by an independent review committee masked to the treatment. Analysis was intention to treat. This trial was registered, number ISRCTN37666216, and is closed to new participants.

          Findings

          Between Dec 10, 2012, and Oct 25, 2016, 758 eligible participants were randomly assigned: 370 to rifampicin and 388 to placebo. 485 (64%) participants had community-acquired S aureus infections, and 132 (17%) had nosocomial S aureus infections. 47 (6%) had meticillin-resistant infections. 301 (40%) participants had an initial deep infection focus. Standard antibiotics were given for 29 (IQR 18–45) days; 619 (82%) participants received flucloxacillin. By week 12, 62 (17%) of participants who received rifampicin versus 71 (18%) who received placebo experienced treatment failure or disease recurrence, or died (absolute risk difference −1·4%, 95% CI −7·0 to 4·3; hazard ratio 0·96, 0·68–1·35, p=0·81). From randomisation to 12 weeks, no evidence of differences in serious (p=0·17) or grade 3–4 (p=0·36) adverse events were observed; however, 63 (17%) participants in the rifampicin group versus 39 (10%) in the placebo group had antibiotic or trial drug-modifying adverse events (p=0·004), and 24 (6%) versus six (2%) had drug interactions (p=0·0005).

          Interpretation

          Adjunctive rifampicin provided no overall benefit over standard antibiotic therapy in adults with S aureus bacteraemia.

          Funding

          UK National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references16

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Are bloodstream leukocytes Trojan Horses for the metastasis of Staphylococcus aureus?

          Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia remains very difficult to treat, and a large proportion of cases result in potentially lethal metastatic infection. Unpredictable and persistent bacteraemia in the face of highly active, usually bactericidal antibiotics is the strongest predictor of death or disseminated disease. Although S. aureus has conventionally been considered an extracellular pathogen, much evidence demonstrates that it can survive intracellularly. In this Opinion article, we propose that phagocytes, and specifically neutrophils, represent a privileged site for S. aureus in the bloodstream, offering protection from most antibiotics and providing a mechanism by which the bacterium can travel to and infect distant sites. Furthermore, we suggest how this can be experimentally confirmed and how it may prompt a change in the current paradigm of S. aureus bacteraemia and identify better treatment options for improved clinical outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia.

            Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is one of the most common serious bacterial infections worldwide. In the UK alone, around 12,500 cases each year are reported, with an associated mortality of about 30%, yet the evidence guiding optimum management is poor. To date, fewer than 1500 patients with S aureus bacteraemia have been recruited to 16 controlled trials of antimicrobial therapy. Consequently, clinical practice is driven by the results of observational studies and anecdote. Here, we propose and review ten unanswered clinical questions commonly posed by those managing S aureus bacteraemia. Our findings define the major areas of uncertainty in the management of S aureus bacteraemia and highlight just two key principles. First, all infective foci must be identified and removed as soon as possible. Second, long-term antimicrobial therapy is required for those with persistent bacteraemia or a deep, irremovable focus. Beyond this, the best drugs, dose, mode of delivery, and duration of therapy are uncertain, a situation compounded by emerging S aureus strains that are resistant to old and new antibiotics. We discuss the consequences on clinical practice, and how these findings define the agenda for future clinical research. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: a pooled analysis of five prospective, observational studies.

              Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is a common, often fatal infection. Our aim was to describe how its clinical presentation varies between populations and to identify common determinants of outcome.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Lancet
                Lancet
                Lancet (London, England)
                Elsevier
                0140-6736
                1474-547X
                17 February 2018
                17 February 2018
                : 391
                : 10121
                : 668-678
                Affiliations
                [a ]Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                [b ]Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
                [c ]Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
                [d ]Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
                [e ]Plymouth Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Plymouth, UK
                [f ]Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
                [g ]Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
                [h ]University College London Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [i ]Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
                [j ]Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Aintree, UK
                [k ]Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, UK
                [l ]Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
                [m ]University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
                [n ]Department of Infection and Tropical Medicine, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK
                [o ]Microbiology Department, Darent Valley Hospital, Dartford, UK
                [p ]North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carlisle, UK
                [q ]Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
                [r ]Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, UK
                [s ]Royal United Hospitals Bath NHS Foundation Trust, Bath, UK
                [t ]Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Bradford, UK
                [u ]Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
                [v ]Wirral University Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birkenhead, UK
                [w ]County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Durham, UK
                [x ]King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [y ]St Georges University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [z ]Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
                [aa ]Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
                [ab ]South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
                [ac ]University of Cambridge, Department of Medicine, Cambridge, UK
                [ad ]Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
                [ae ]King's College London, London, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence to: Prof Guy E Thwaites, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UKCorrespondence to: Prof Guy E Thwaites, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global HealthNuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordOX3 7BNUK gthwaites@ 123456oucru.org
                [†]

                See appendix for full list of investigators

                Article
                S0140-6736(17)32456-X
                10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32456-X
                5820409
                29249276
                5b643759-86ed-436c-9352-a2624f4da146
                © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content281

                Cited by59