2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Correction to: Outcome of kidney function after ischaemic and zero-ischaemic laparoscopic and open nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell cancer

      correction

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Correction to: BMC Nephrology (2019) 20:40 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1215-3 Following publication of the original article [1], it was reported that Fig. 1i and Fig. 1j were omitted due to a typesetting mistake. In this Correction, the complete Fig. 1 is shown and the original publication of this article has been updated to correct this. The publisher apologises to the authors and readers for the inconvenience. Fig. 1 Box plots showing the postoperative course of the absolute (a/c/e/g/i) and relative (b/d/f/h/j) change (%) in eGFR at measurement times A-E for (a/b) the overall NSS cohort (NSS-C), (c/d) the NSS group with intraoperative renal ischaemia (NSS-RI) and without intraoperative renal ischaemia (NSS-NRI), (e/f) the LNSS group with intraoperative renal ischaemia (LNSS-RI), the ONSS group with intraoperative renal ischaemia (ONSS-RI), (g/h) the NSS group with postoperative AKI (NSS-AKI), the NSS group without postoperative AKI (NSS-NAKI), and (i/j) NSS group with a baseline eGFR category G1 (NSS-G1), NSS group with a baseline eGFR category G2 (NSS-G2), and NSS group with a baseline eGFR category ≥G3 (NSS ≥ G3). Definition of measurement times a-e: (a) highest change in eGFR from baseline during the planned hospital stay at a median of 1 day postoperatively (IQR, 1–2), (b) change in eGFR from baseline prior to discharge from hospital at a median of 4 days postoperatively (IQR, 2–6), (c) change in eGFR from baseline at a median of 47 days postoperatively (IQR, 30–105), (d) a median of 13 months postoperatively (IQR, 12–15), and (e) a median of 50 months postoperatively (IQR, 35–81). Asterisks indicate significant changes from baseline in the level of absolute and relative changes in eGFR over the course of the observation period (Friedman’s test as a post hoc pairwise multiple comparison test) or between the compared groups at each measurement time (non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, (ns) not significant. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NSS, nephron-sparing surgery; LNSS, laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery; ONSS, open nephronsparing surgery; AKI, acute kidney injury; IQR, interquartile range Additionally, the authors reported that the caption of Table 4 was incorrectly presented as “Multiple linear regression analysis”. The correct presentation of this table caption is “Multiple regression analysis”. And Table 4 with its corrected caption can be found on page 3-4. Table 4 Multiple regression analysis a (model 1) Regressioncoefficientβ Multiple linear regression95% CI p-value Baseline eGFR (mL/ml/1.73 m22) - 0.20 - 0.38 - − 0.02 0.03 Baseline Haemoglobin (mg/dL) 0.51 - 0.86 - 1.89 0.46 Tumour diameter (cm) 0.67 - 0.43 - 1.76 0.24 Tumour locus central (ref.) vs. peripheral 0.43 - 3.80 - 4.67 0.84 Surgical approach LNSS (ref.) vs. ONSS - 13.48 - 17.65 - − 9.32 < 0.001 Sex male (ref.) vs. female - 3.28 - 7.80 - 1.25 0.16 Age (years) - 0.17 - 0.36 - 0.01 0.06 BMI (kg/m2) - 0.88 - 1.36 - − 0.41 < 0.001 Hypertension no (ref.) vs. yes - 0.78 - 4.75 - 3.18 0.70 Ischaemia time (min) - 0.27 - 0.41 - − 0.13 < 0.001 Operative time (min) - 0.06 - 0.09 - − 0.03 < 0.001 Preoperative ureter stenting no (ref.) vs. yes - 0.46 - 5.64 - 4.71 0.86 Intraoperative blood transfusions no (ref.) vs. yes - 3.29 - 11.91 - 5.33 0.45 Postoperative complications no (ref.) vs. yes - 3.36 - 8.42 - 1.70 0.19 Clavien-Dindo score < 3 (ref.) vs. ≥ 3 - 10.98 - 18.47 - − 3.48 0.004 b (model 2) Regressioncoefficientβ Multiple linear regression95% CI p-value Baseline eGFR (mL/ml/1.73 m22) - 0.29 - 0.49 - − 0.09 0.005 Baseline Haemoglobin (mg/dL) - 0.32 - 1.95 - 1.31 0.70 Relative change of eGFR from baseline at time A (%) 0.18 0.03 - 0.33 0.02 AKI 48 h p.o. no (ref.) vs. yes - 2.11 - 9.01 - 4.79 0.55 Tumour diameter (cm) - 1.76 - 2.87 - − 0.66 0.002 Tumour locus central (ref.) vs. peripheral - 0.30 - 5.14 - 4.54 0.90 Surgical approach LNSS (ref.) vs. ONSS 1.13 - 4.17 - − 6.44 0.67 Sex male (ref.) vs. female 1.63 - 3.43 - 6.70 0.53 Age (years) - 0.10 - 0.33 - 0.13 0.40 BMI (kg/m2) 0.15 - 0.39 - 0.70 0.58 Hypertension no (ref.) vs. yes - 2.11 - 6.82 - 2.60 0.38 Ischaemia time (min) 0.03 - 0.14 - 0.21 0.72 Operative time (min) 0.01 - 0.03 - 0.05 0.54 Preoperative ureter stenting no (ref.) vs. yes - 4.35 - 10.46 - 1.77 0.16 Intraoperative blood transfusions no (ref.) vs. yes 4.12 - 6.29 - 14.52 0.44 Postoperative complications no (ref.) vs. yes 1.20 - 4.77 - 7.18 0.69 Clavien-Dindo score < 3 (ref.) vs. ≥ 3 4.43 - 4.28 - 13.14 0.32 c (model 3) OR Multiple logistic regression95% CI p-value Baseline eGFR (mL/ml/1.73 m22) 0.99 0.96 - 1.01 0.30 Baseline Haemoglobin (mg/dl) 0.85 0.70 - 1.03 0.10 Tumour diameter (cm) 0.94 0.81 - 1.08 0.35 Tumour locus central (ref.) vs. peripheral 1.20 0.70 - 2.05 0.51 Surgical approach LNSS (ref.) vs. ONSS 3.87 2.17 - 6.92 < 0.001 Sex male (ref.) vs. female 2.51 1.35 - 4.67 0.004 Age (years) 1.01 0.99 - 1.04 0.26 BMI (kg/m2) 1.13 1.06 - 1.21 < 0.001 Hypertension no (ref.) vs. yes 1.05 0.63 - 1.74 0.85 Ischaemia time (min) 1.02 1.00 - 1.04 0.046 Operative time (min) 1.01 1.00 - 1.01 0.002 Preoperative ureter stenting no (ref.) vs. yes 0.92 0.46 - 1.83 0.81 Intraoperative blood transfusions no (ref.) vs. yes 0.73 0.22 - 2.45 0.61 Postoperative complications no (ref.) vs. yes 1.79 0.92 - 3.48 0.08 Clavien-Dindo score < 3 (ref.) vs. ≥ 3 2.14 0.68 - 6.72 0.19 d (model 4) OR Multiple logistic regression95% CI p-value Baseline eGFR (mL/ml/1.73 m2) 0.89 0.85 - 0.92 < 0.001 Baseline Haemoglobin (mg/dL) 0.99 0.73 - 1.35 0.95 Relative change of eGFR from baseline at time A (%) 0.98 0.98 - 1.01 0.12 AKI 48 h p.o. no (ref.) vs. yes 1.23 0.39 - 3.85 0.72 Tumour diameter (cm) 0.93 0.71 - 1.21 0.58 Tumour locus central (ref.) vs. peripheral 1.35 0.56 - 3.15 0.49 Surgical approach LNSS (ref.) vs. ONSS 1.69 0.67 - 4.24 0.26 Sex male (ref.) vs. female 0.63 0.24 - 1.67 0.35 Age (years) 0.99 0.95 - 1.04 0.75 BMI (kg/m2) 0.97 0.87 - 1.07 0.50 Hypertension no (ref.) vs. yes 1.62 0.66 - 4.00 0.29 Ischaemia time (min) 1.01 0.98 - 1.04 0.55 Operative time (min) 1.00 0.99 - 1.01 0.86 Preoperative ureter stenting no (ref.) vs. yes 1.26 0.41 - 3.86 0.68 Intraoperative blood transfusions no (ref.) vs. yes 0.95 0.08 - 11.05 0.97 Postoperative complications no (ref.) vs. yes 0.67 0.22 - 2.00 0.47 Clavien-Dindo score < 3 (ref.) vs. ≥ 3 1.37 0.22 - 8.41 0.73 Multiple linear regression analysis for models 1 and 2 including ischaemia time as a continuous variable investigating predictors of the relative change (%) of eGFR from baseline at (a) measurement time A (median, 1 day p.o.; IQR, 1–2) and at (b) at measurement time D (median, 13 months p.o.; IQR 12–15), and multiple logistic regression analysis for models 3 and 4 including ischaemia time as a continuous variable investigating (c) predictors for the development of postoperative AKI within 48 h p.o. and (d) predictors for the development of postoperative new-onset CKD stage ≥ 3 (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) within measurement time D The regression models are based on pooled estimates from 100 imputed datasets. A p-value < 0.05 is regarded as statistically significant eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, CKD chronic kidney disease, AKI acute kidney injury, LNSS laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery, ONSS open nephron-sparing surgery, BMI body mass index, OR odds ratio

          Related collections

          Most cited references1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Outcome of kidney function after ischaemic and zero-ischaemic laparoscopic and open nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell cancer

          Background Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) remains gold standard for the treatment of localised renal cell cancer (RCC), even in case of a normal contralateral kidney. Compared to radical nephrectomy, kidney failure and cardiovascular events are less frequent with NSS. However, the effects of different surgical approaches and of zero ischaemia on the postoperative reduction in renal function remain controversial. We aimed to investigate the relative short- and long-term changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) after ischaemic or zero-ischaemic open (ONSS) and laparoscopic NSS (LNSS) for RCC, and to analyse prognostic factors for postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage ≥3. Methods Data of 444 patients (211 LNSS, 233 ONSS), including 57 zero-ischaemic cases, were retrospectively analysed. Multiple regression models were used to predict relative changes in renal function. Natural cubic splines were used to demonstrate the association between ischaemia time (IT) and relative changes in renal function. Results IT was identified as significant risk factor for short-term relative changes in eGFR (ß = − 0.27) and development of AKI (OR, 1.02), but no effect was found on long-term relative changes in eGFR. Natural cubic splines revealed that IT had a greater effect on patients with baseline eGFR categories ≥G3 concerning short-term decrease in renal function and development of AKI. Unlike LNSS, ONSS was significantly associated with short-term decrease in renal function (ß = − 13.48) and development of AKI (OR, 3.87). Tumour diameter was associated with long-term decrease in renal function (ß = − 1.76), whereas baseline eGFR was a prognostic factor for both short- (ß = − 0.20) and long-term (ß = − 0.29) relative changes in eGFR and the development of CKD stage ≥3 (OR, 0.89). Conclusions IT is a significant risk factor for AKI. The short-term effect of IT is not always linear, and the impact also depends on baseline eGFR. Unlike LNSS, ONSS is associated with the development of AKI. Our findings are helpful for surgical planning, and suggest either the application of a clampless NSS technique or at least the shortest possible IT to reduce the risk of short-time impairment of the renal function, which might prevent AKI, particularly regarding patients with baseline eGFR category ≥G3.
            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            jan.ebbing@usb.ch
            Journal
            BMC Nephrol
            BMC Nephrol
            BMC Nephrology
            BioMed Central (London )
            1471-2369
            7 March 2019
            7 March 2019
            2019
            : 20
            : 86
            Affiliations
            [1 ]GRID grid.410567.1, University Hospital Basel, Urological University Clinic Basel-Liestal, ; Spitalstrasse 21, 4051 Basel, Switzerland
            [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2218 4662, GRID grid.6363.0, Department of Urology, , Charité - University Hospital, ; Berlin, Germany
            [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Karolinska Institutet, Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), ; Stockholm, Sweden
            [4 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1937 0626, GRID grid.4714.6, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery (MMK), , Karolinska Institutet, ; Stockholm, Sweden
            [5 ]GRID grid.459734.8, Marien Hospital Herne – University Clinic of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Medical Clinic I, ; Herne, Germany
            [6 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9241 5705, GRID grid.24381.3c, Department of Urology, , Karolinska - University Hospital, ; Solna, Stockholm Sweden
            [7 ]Department of Urology, Franziskus Hospital Berlin, Berlin, Germany
            Article
            1264
            10.1186/s12882-019-1264-7
            6404321
            30845916
            5bb4d5af-552b-4f64-883b-7aa50707afa9
            © The Author(s). 2019

            Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

            History
            : 7 February 2019
            : 7 February 2019
            Categories
            Correction
            Custom metadata
            © The Author(s) 2019

            Nephrology
            Nephrology

            Comments

            Comment on this article