2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Improved low-risk criteria scores for combination therapy of sildenafil and generic bosentan in patients with congenital heart disease with severe pulmonary hypertension: A prospective open label study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the bosentan as a sequential add-on therapy with sildenafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension with congenital heart disease (PAH-CHD) patients.

          Material and method

          Twenty patients who were receiving sildenafil were given generic bosentan for up to a year. Hemodynamic data was collected from cardiac catheterization at pretreatment and at three months. Comparisons were made between the total scores of the four, low-risk criteria adapted from the 2015 ESC/ERS pulmonary hypertension guidelines, which are: 1) WHO functional class of I or II, 2) 6MWD of more than 440 m, 3) right atrial pressure of less than 8 mm Hg, and 4) cardiac index ≥2.5 L/min/m 2, performed at the beginning of therapy, 3-months, 6-months, and 1 year.

          Results

          Patients’ average age was 27 ± 11 years old (12–53). PVRi decreased from 16.7 ± 9.5 to 12.7 ± 10.3 Wood unit (WU) m2 (p = 0.025) and PVRi/SVRi decreased from 0.69 ± 0.33 to 0.49 ± 0.32 (p = 0.001). During the follow-up, the composite scoring of the low risk scores for 19 patients was increased significantly from 1.8 ± 1.0 at baseline to 2.3 ± 0.9 at 3 months, to 2.9 ± 0.8 at 6 months, and 3 ± 0.7 at 1 year (p = 0.001).

          Conclusion

          We demonstrated intermediate term benefits for generic bosentan as an add-on therapy to sildenafil in patients with PAH-CHD by improving PVRi, and PVRi/SVRi at three months. A significant improvement was also seen in the combined scores of the low-risk criteria from below 2 to 3 at one year (p = 0.001).

          Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR): TCTR identification number is TCTR20200506006.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT).

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Haemodynamic definitions and updated clinical classification of pulmonary hypertension

            Since the 1st World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (WSPH) in 1973, pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been arbitrarily defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg at rest, measured by right heart catheterisation. Recent data from normal subjects has shown that normal mPAP was 14.0±3.3 mmHg. Two standard deviations above this mean value would suggest mPAP >20 mmHg as above the upper limit of normal (above the 97.5th percentile). This definition is no longer arbitrary, but based on a scientific approach. However, this abnormal elevation of mPAP is not sufficient to define pulmonary vascular disease as it can be due to an increase in cardiac output or pulmonary arterial wedge pressure. Thus, this 6th WSPH Task Force proposes to include pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 Wood Units in the definition of all forms of pre-capillary PH associated with mPAP >20 mmHg. Prospective trials are required to determine whether this PH population might benefit from specific management. Regarding clinical classification, the main Task Force changes were the inclusion in group 1 of a subgroup “pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) long-term responders to calcium channel blockers”, due to the specific prognostic and management of these patients, and a subgroup “PAH with overt features of venous/capillaries (pulmonary veno-occlusive disease/pulmonary capillary haemangiomatosis) involvement”, due to evidence suggesting a continuum between arterial, capillary and vein involvement in PAH.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Risk assessment, prognosis and guideline implementation in pulmonary arterial hypertension

              Current European guidelines recommend periodic risk assessment for patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The aim of our study was to determine the association between the number of low-risk criteria achieved within 1 year of diagnosis and long-term prognosis. Incident patients with idiopathic, heritable and drug-induced PAH between 2006 and 2016 were analysed. The number of low-risk criteria present at diagnosis and at first re-evaluation were assessed: World Health Organization (WHO)/New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I or II, 6-min walking distance (6MWD) >440 m, right atrial pressure <8 mmHg and cardiac index ≥2.5 L·min−1·m−2. 1017 patients were included (mean age 57 years, 59% female, 75% idiopathic PAH). After a median follow-up of 34 months, 238 (23%) patients had died. Each of the four low-risk criteria independently predicted transplant-free survival at first re-evaluation. The number of low-risk criteria present at diagnosis (p<0.001) and at first re-evaluation (p<0.001) discriminated the risk of death or lung transplantation. In addition, in a subgroup of 603 patients with brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurements, the number of three noninvasive criteria (WHO/NYHA functional class, 6MWD and BNP/NT-proBNP) present at first re-evaluation discriminated prognostic groups (p<0.001). A simplified risk assessment tool that quantifies the number of low-risk criteria present accurately predicted transplant-free survival in PAH.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JRSM Cardiovasc Dis
                JRSM Cardiovasc Dis
                CVD
                spcvd
                JRSM Cardiovascular Disease
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                2048-0040
                21 January 2021
                Jan-Dec 2021
                : 10
                : 2048004020982213
                Affiliations
                [1-2048004020982213]Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
                Author notes
                [*]Kritvikrom Durongpisitkul, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, 2 Wang Lang Road, Bangkok Noi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. Email: kritvikrom.dur@ 123456mahidol.ac.th
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9295-516X
                Article
                10.1177_2048004020982213
                10.1177/2048004020982213
                7829601
                5be10b37-475e-4344-812c-41e1aa2bac5d
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                : 7 June 2020
                : 30 September 2020
                : 30 November 2020
                Funding
                Funded by: Medline Co, Ltd (Thailand);
                Award ID: : Bosentan (Unison Laboratories, Thailand) was do
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                January-December 2021
                ts2

                eisenmenger,pah specific drugs,bosentan,combination therapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article