19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
2 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reinfection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 in an Immunocompromised Patient: A Case Report

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor—Knowing the frequency and natural course of reinfections is important for strategies for control of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recently, To et al published a report of a 33-year-old Hong Kong resident with a SARS-CoV-2 reinfection, confirmed by whole-genome sequencing [1]. Here, we report a case of a reinfection in an 89-year-old Dutch woman suffering from Waldenström macroglobulinemia, treated with B-cell–depleting therapy. She presented to the emergency department with fever and severe cough and a lymphocyte count of 0.4 × 109 cells/L. An in-house SARS-CoV-2 reverse-transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay (E-gen) [2] on a nasopharyngeal swab was positive (cycle quantification value [Cq] = 26.2). She was discharged after 5 days; other than some persisting fatigue, her symptoms subsided completely. Two days after a new chemotherapy treatment, 59 days after the start of the first coronavirus disease 2019 episode, the patient developed fever, cough, and dyspnea. At admission, her oxygen saturation was 90% with a respiratory rate of 40 breaths per minute. The SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR assay on a nasopharyngeal swab was positive (E-gen; Cq = 25.2). At days 4 and 6, serum was tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using the Wantai SARS-CoV-2 total antibody and the immunoglobulin M enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays; both were negative. At day 8, the condition of the patient deteriorated, and she died 2 weeks later. The viral genomes of both episodes were compared using SARS-CoV-2–specific multiplex qPCR and Nanopore sequencing [3]. The 2 strains differed at 10 nucleotide positions in the ORF1a (4), ORF 1b (2), Spike (2), ORF3a (1), and M (1) genes (Figure 1) and the sequences did not cluster in the phylogenetic tree (Supplementary Figure 1). Although we did not have PCR-negative samples in between episodes, with an average estimated SARS-CoV-2 mutation rate of 33 nucleotides per year (or 5–6 nucleotides per 2 months) [4], it is likely that the second episode was a reinfection rather than prolonged shedding. Figure 1. Sequences of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 strains of the first and second coronavirus disease 2019 episodes. The black lines indicate the differences in nucleotides between the 2 strains. The black boxes indicate that these were locations of the genome that could not be determined reliably (1.85% of the genome). In contrast to the Hong Kong resident, our patient experienced a more severe second episode. This has also been described in a 25-year-old Nevada resident with no underlying comorbidities [5]. Our patient was immunocompromised because of Waldenström macroglobulinemia treated with B-cell–depleting therapy, resulting in a declined humoral immunity [6]. However, it was shown that B-cell–depleting therapy does not necessarily result in life-threatening disease, suggesting that the innate immune response and T-cell immunity can be sufficient to eliminate SARS-CoV-2 [7]. SARS-CoV-2 reinfections are expected to occur once antibody titers decrease and immunity wanes. Although a recent population study in Iceland has shown that antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 did not decline within 4 months after infection [8], reinfections in seasonal coronaviruses, such as human coronaviruses NL63, 229E, OC43, and HKU1, were observed as early as 6 months postinfection. Frequent reinfections were shown from 12 months postinfection [9]. The Hong Kong resident did not have measurable antibodies at the start of the second episode, which occurred 4–5 months after the first. However, the second episode was asymptomatic, indicating sufficient immunological memory. Our patient and the Nevada patient suffered from an early reinfection within 2 months, unfortunately without serum samples in between episodes. The Nevada resident did develop a measurable antibody response after the second episode. Our patient did not have antibodies 6 days after start of the second episode, but seroconversion can take a few days longer. Supplementary Data Supplementary materials are available at Clinical Infectious Diseases online. Consisting of data provided by the authors to benefit the reader, the posted materials are not copyedited and are the sole responsibility of the authors, so questions or comments should be addressed to the corresponding author. ciaa1538_suppl_Supplementary_Fig_1 Click here for additional data file. ciaa1538_suppl_Supplementary_Fig_legend Click here for additional data file.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

          Background The ongoing outbreak of the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) poses a challenge for public health laboratories as virus isolates are unavailable while there is growing evidence that the outbreak is more widespread than initially thought, and international spread through travellers does already occur. Aim We aimed to develop and deploy robust diagnostic methodology for use in public health laboratory settings without having virus material available. Methods Here we present a validated diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV, its design relying on close genetic relatedness of 2019-nCoV with SARS coronavirus, making use of synthetic nucleic acid technology. Results The workflow reliably detects 2019-nCoV, and further discriminates 2019-nCoV from SARS-CoV. Through coordination between academic and public laboratories, we confirmed assay exclusivity based on 297 original clinical specimens containing a full spectrum of human respiratory viruses. Control material is made available through European Virus Archive – Global (EVAg), a European Union infrastructure project. Conclusion The present study demonstrates the enormous response capacity achieved through coordination of academic and public laboratories in national and European research networks.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Humoral Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland

            Abstract Background Little is known about the nature and durability of the humoral immune response to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods We measured antibodies in serum samples from 30,576 persons in Iceland, using six assays (including two pan-immunoglobulin [pan-Ig] assays), and we determined that the appropriate measure of seropositivity was a positive result with both pan-Ig assays. We tested 2102 samples collected from 1237 persons up to 4 months after diagnosis by a quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (qPCR) assay. We measured antibodies in 4222 quarantined persons who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and in 23,452 persons not known to have been exposed. Results Of the 1797 persons who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection, 1107 of the 1215 who were tested (91.1%) were seropositive; antiviral antibody titers assayed by two pan-Ig assays increased during 2 months after diagnosis by qPCR and remained on a plateau for the remainder of the study. Of quarantined persons, 2.3% were seropositive; of those with unknown exposure, 0.3% were positive. We estimate that 0.9% of Icelanders were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and that the infection was fatal in 0.3%. We also estimate that 56% of all SARS-CoV-2 infections in Iceland had been diagnosed with qPCR, 14% had occurred in quarantined persons who had not been tested with qPCR (or who had not received a positive result, if tested), and 30% had occurred in persons outside quarantine and not tested with qPCR. Conclusions Our results indicate that antiviral antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 did not decline within 4 months after diagnosis. We estimate that the risk of death from infection was 0.3% and that 44% of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland were not diagnosed by qPCR.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              COVID-19 re-infection by a phylogenetically distinct SARS-coronavirus-2 strain confirmed by whole genome sequencing

              Abstract Background Waning immunity occurs in patients who have recovered from COVID-19. However, it remains unclear whether true re-infection occurs. Methods Whole genome sequencing was performed directly on respiratory specimens collected during two episodes of COVID-19 in a patient. Comparative genome analysis was conducted to differentiate re-infection from persistent viral shedding. Laboratory results, including RT-PCR Ct values and serum SARS-CoV-2 IgG, were analyzed. Results The second episode of asymptomatic infection occurred 142 days after the first symptomatic episode in an apparently immunocompetent patient. During the second episode, there was serological evidence of elevated C-reactive protein and SARS-CoV-2 IgG seroconversion. Viral genomes from first and second episodes belong to different clades/lineages. Compared to viral genomes in GISAID, the first virus genome has a stop codon at position 64 of orf8 leading to a truncation of 58 amino acids, and was phylogenetically closely related to strains collected in March/April 2020, while the second virus genome was closely related to strains collected in July/August 2020. Another 23 nucleotide and 13 amino acid differences located in 9 different proteins, including positions of B and T cell epitopes, were found between viruses from the first and second episodes. Conclusions Epidemiological, clinical, serological and genomic analyses confirmed that the patient had re-infection instead of persistent viral shedding from first infection. Our results suggest SARS-CoV-2 may continue to circulate among the human populations despite herd immunity due to natural infection or vaccination. Further studies of patients with re-infection will shed light on protective correlates important for vaccine design.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clin Infect Dis
                Clin Infect Dis
                cid
                Clinical Infectious Diseases: An Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
                Oxford University Press (US )
                1058-4838
                1537-6591
                09 October 2020
                : ciaa1538
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Medical Microbiology, Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht, The Netherlands
                [2 ] Department of Medical Microbiology, PAMM Laboratories , Veldhoven, The Netherlands
                [3 ] Department of Viroscience, Erasmus Medical Center , Rotterdam, The Netherlands
                [4 ] Department of Internal Medicine, Elkerliek Hospital , Helmond, The Netherlands
                Author notes
                Correspondence: M. C. A. Wegdam-Blans, Department of Medical Microbiology, PAMM Laboratories, De Run 6250, 5504DL Veldhoven, The Netherlands ( m.wegdam@ 123456pamm.nl ).
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1509-1921
                Article
                ciaa1538
                10.1093/cid/ciaa1538
                7665355
                33043962
                5bedf59f-e3c9-4065-9ddb-bff2f0977a2c
                © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

                This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.

                History
                : 06 November 2020
                Page count
                Pages: 2
                Categories
                Correspondence
                AcademicSubjects/MED00290
                Custom metadata
                PAP
                corrected-proof

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article