16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The disposal of food waste is a large environmental problem. In the United Kingdom (UK), approximately 15 million tonnes of food are wasted each year, mostly disposed of in landfill, via composting, or anaerobic digestion (AD). European Union (EU) guidelines state that food waste should preferentially be used as animal feed though for most food waste this practice is currently illegal, because of disease control concerns. Interest in the potential diversion of food waste for animal feed is however growing, with a number of East Asian states offering working examples of safe food waste recycling – based on tight regulation and rendering food waste safe through heat treatment. This study investigates the potential benefits of diverting food waste for pig feed in the UK. A hybrid, consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to compare the environmental and health impacts of four technologies for food waste processing: two technologies of South Korean style-animal feed production (as a wet pig feed and a dry pig feed) were compared with two widespread UK disposal technologies: AD and composting. Results of 14 mid-point impact categories show that the processing of food waste as a wet pig feed and a dry pig feed have the best and second-best scores, respectively, for 13/14 and 12/14 environmental and health impacts. The low impact of food waste feed stems in large part from its substitution of conventional feed, the production of which has substantial environmental and health impacts. While the re-legalisation of the use of food waste as pig feed could offer environmental and public health benefits, this will require support from policy makers, the public, and the pig industry, as well as investment in separated food waste collection which currently occurs in only a minority of regions.

          Highlights

          • There is growing interest in the re-legalisation of food waste as animal feed in the EU.

          • We compare environmental impacts of 4 food waste disposal options, including as pig feed.

          • We use a hybrid LCA approach to overcome the limitations of conventional LCA.

          • Recycling food waste as pig feed has lower environmental impact than AD or composting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The food waste hierarchy as a framework for the management of food surplus and food waste

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Errors in Conventional and Input-Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Safety of Novel Protein Sources (Insects, Microalgae, Seaweed, Duckweed, and Rapeseed) and Legislative Aspects for Their Application in Food and Feed Production

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                J Clean Prod
                J Clean Prod
                Journal of Cleaner Production
                Elsevier Science
                0959-6526
                1879-1786
                01 January 2017
                01 January 2017
                : 140
                : 871-880
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
                [b ]Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, UK
                [c ]Department of Environmental Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, San 56-1, Sillim-Dong, Gwanak-Gu, Seoul 151-742, South Korea
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author. ekhjz2@ 123456cam.ac.uk
                [1]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                S0959-6526(16)30504-2
                10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.049
                5127519
                28050118
                5bee86f5-b29f-426c-b425-eabca4f9c2d4
                © 2016 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 7 December 2015
                : 5 May 2016
                : 6 May 2016
                Categories
                Article

                food waste,hybrid life-cycle assessment,animal feed,anaerobic digestion,composting,swill

                Comments

                Comment on this article