113
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      OTU Deubiquitinases Reveal Mechanisms of Linkage Specificity and Enable Ubiquitin Chain Restriction Analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          Sixteen ovarian tumor (OTU) family deubiquitinases (DUBs) exist in humans, and most members regulate cell-signaling cascades. Several OTU DUBs were reported to be ubiquitin (Ub) chain linkage specific, but comprehensive analyses are missing, and the underlying mechanisms of linkage specificity are unclear. Using Ub chains of all eight linkage types, we reveal that most human OTU enzymes are linkage specific, preferring one, two, or a defined subset of linkage types, including unstudied atypical Ub chains. Biochemical analysis and five crystal structures of OTU DUBs with or without Ub substrates reveal four mechanisms of linkage specificity. Additional Ub-binding domains, the ubiquitinated sequence in the substrate, and defined S1’ and S2 Ub-binding sites on the OTU domain enable OTU DUBs to distinguish linkage types. We introduce Ub chain restriction analysis, in which OTU DUBs are used as restriction enzymes to reveal linkage type and the relative abundance of Ub chains on substrates.

          Graphical Abstract

          Highlights

          • The 16 human OTU DUBs cleave distinct sets of ubiquitin chain types

          • Five crystal structures of three human OTU DUBs reveal uncharacterized Ub-binding sites

          • We reveal four distinct mechanisms of linkage specificity in OTU DUBs

          • OTU DUBs can be used to identify the linkage types on a ubiquitinated substrate

          Abstract

          OTU deubiquitinases use four distinct mechanisms of linkage specificity to hydrolyze ubiquitin, and, due to their specificity, OTU DUBs can be used in ubiquitin chain restriction analysis to characterize the chain types on ubiquitinated proteins.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Systematic and quantitative assessment of the ubiquitin-modified proteome.

          Despite the diverse biological pathways known to be regulated by ubiquitylation, global identification of substrates that are targeted for ubiquitylation has remained a challenge. To globally characterize the human ubiquitin-modified proteome (ubiquitinome), we utilized a monoclonal antibody that recognizes diglycine (diGly)-containing isopeptides following trypsin digestion. We identify ~19,000 diGly-modified lysine residues within ~5000 proteins. Using quantitative proteomics we monitored temporal changes in diGly site abundance in response to both proteasomal and translational inhibition, indicating both a dependence on ongoing translation to observe alterations in site abundance and distinct dynamics of individual modified lysines in response to proteasome inhibition. Further, we demonstrate that quantitative diGly proteomics can be utilized to identify substrates for cullin-RING ubiquitin ligases. Interrogation of the ubiquitinome allows for not only a quantitative assessment of alterations in protein homeostasis fidelity, but also identification of substrates for individual ubiquitin pathway enzymes. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Defining the human deubiquitinating enzyme interaction landscape.

            Deubiquitinating enzymes (Dubs) function to remove covalently attached ubiquitin from proteins, thereby controlling substrate activity and/or abundance. For most Dubs, their functions, targets, and regulation are poorly understood. To systematically investigate Dub function, we initiated a global proteomic analysis of Dubs and their associated protein complexes. This was accomplished through the development of a software platform called CompPASS, which uses unbiased metrics to assign confidence measurements to interactions from parallel nonreciprocal proteomic data sets. We identified 774 candidate interacting proteins associated with 75 Dubs. Using Gene Ontology, interactome topology classification, subcellular localization, and functional studies, we link Dubs to diverse processes, including protein turnover, transcription, RNA processing, DNA damage, and endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation. This work provides the first glimpse into the Dub interaction landscape, places previously unstudied Dubs within putative biological pathways, and identifies previously unknown interactions and protein complexes involved in this increasingly important arm of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Regulation and cellular roles of ubiquitin-specific deubiquitinating enzymes.

              Deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) are proteases that process ubiquitin or ubiquitin-like gene products, reverse the modification of proteins by a single ubiquitin(-like) protein, and remodel polyubiquitin(-like) chains on target proteins. The human genome encodes nearly 100 DUBs with specificity for ubiquitin in five gene families. Most DUB activity is cryptic, and conformational rearrangements often occur during the binding of ubiquitin and/or scaffold proteins. DUBs with specificity for ubiquitin contain insertions and extensions modulating DUB substrate specificity, protein-protein interactions, and cellular localization. Binding partners and multiprotein complexes with which DUBs associate modulate DUB activity and substrate specificity. Quantitative studies of activity and protein-protein interactions, together with genetic studies and the advent of RNAi, have led to new insights into the function of yeast and human DUBs. This review discusses ubiquitin-specific DUBs, some of the generalizations emerging from recent studies of the regulation of DUB activity, and their roles in various cellular processes.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell
                Cell Press
                0092-8674
                1097-4172
                03 July 2013
                03 July 2013
                : 154
                : 1
                : 169-184
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Francis Crick Avenue, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
                [2 ]Freie Universität Berlin, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
                [3 ]Division of Cell Biology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                []Corresponding author dk@ 123456mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
                [4]

                Present address: Buchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Max-von-Laue- Straße 15, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

                [5]

                Present address: Medical Research Council Protein Phosphorylation and Ubiquitination Unit, Dow Street, Dundee DD15EH, UK

                [6]

                These authors contributed equally to this work

                Article
                CELL6935
                10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.046
                3705208
                23827681
                5c2537f0-06d9-4aa9-96ee-e96878eec70d
                © 2013 The Authors

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 9 December 2012
                : 2 May 2013
                : 28 May 2013
                Categories
                Article

                Cell biology
                Cell biology

                Comments

                Comment on this article