11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Optimal Power Allocation for Hybrid Energy Harvesting and Power Grid Coexisting System With Power Upper Bounded Constraints

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Transmission with Energy Harvesting Nodes in Fading Wireless Channels: Optimal Policies

          Wireless systems comprised of rechargeable nodes have a significantly prolonged lifetime and are sustainable. A distinct characteristic of these systems is the fact that the nodes can harvest energy throughout the duration in which communication takes place. As such, transmission policies of the nodes need to adapt to these harvested energy arrivals. In this paper, we consider optimization of point-to-point data transmission with an energy harvesting transmitter which has a limited battery capacity, communicating in a wireless fading channel. We consider two objectives: maximizing the throughput by a deadline, and minimizing the transmission completion time of the communication session. We optimize these objectives by controlling the time sequence of transmit powers subject to energy storage capacity and causality constraints. We, first, study optimal offline policies. We introduce a directional water-filling algorithm which provides a simple and concise interpretation of the necessary optimality conditions. We show the optimality of an adaptive directional water-filling algorithm for the throughput maximization problem. We solve the transmission completion time minimization problem by utilizing its equivalence to its throughput maximization counterpart. Next, we consider online policies. We use stochastic dynamic programming to solve for the optimal online policy that maximizes the average number of bits delivered by a deadline under stochastic fading and energy arrival processes with causal channel state feedback. We also propose near-optimal policies with reduced complexity, and numerically study their performances along with the performances of the offline and online optimal policies under various different configurations.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Optimal Energy Allocation for Wireless Communications With Energy Harvesting Constraints

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Optimal Energy Management Policies for Energy Harvesting Sensor Nodes

              We study a sensor node with an energy harvesting source. The generated energy can be stored in a buffer. The sensor node periodically senses a random field and generates a packet. These packets are stored in a queue and transmitted using the energy available at that time. We obtain energy management policies that are throughput optimal, i.e., the data queue stays stable for the largest possible data rate. Next we obtain energy management policies which minimize the mean delay in the queue.We also compare performance of several easily implementable sub-optimal energy management policies. A greedy policy is identified which, in low SNR regime, is throughput optimal and also minimizes mean delay.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks
                IEEE Trans. on Signal and Inf. Process. over Networks
                Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
                2373-776X
                2373-7778
                March 2017
                March 2017
                : 3
                : 1
                : 187-199
                Article
                10.1109/TSIPN.2016.2607123
                5c388865-b387-4a33-958b-5c01b2647e37
                © 2017
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article