9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Efficiency of genomic selection for breeding population design and phenotype prediction in tomato

      , , , , , , , ,
      Heredity
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Genomic selection (GS), which uses estimated genetic potential based on genome-wide genotype data for a breeding selection, is now widely accepted as an efficient method to improve genetically complex traits. We assessed the potential of GS for increasing soluble solids content and total fruit weight of tomato. A collection of big-fruited F1 varieties was used to construct the GS models, and the progeny from crosses was used to validate the models. The present study includes two experiments: a prediction of a parental combination that generates superior progeny and the prediction of progeny phenotypes. The GS models successfully predicted a better parent even if the phenotypic value did not vary substantially between candidates. The GS models also predicted phenotypes of progeny, although their efficiency varied depending on the parental cross combinations and the selected traits. Although further analyses are required to apply GS in an actual breeding situation, our results indicated that GS is a promising strategy for future tomato breeding design.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Heredity
          Heredity
          Springer Nature
          0018-067X
          1365-2540
          September 14 2016
          September 14 2016
          : 118
          : 2
          : 202-209
          Article
          10.1038/hdy.2016.84
          5234485
          27624117
          5c5d48ec-884c-44e2-a07b-357fb2f443c6
          © 2016
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article