7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience.

      Radiology
      Aged, Cardiac Volume, physiology, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Disease, diagnosis, physiopathology, Diastole, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Male, Mathematical Computing, Middle Aged, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Software, Statistics as Topic, Stroke Volume, Systole, Tomography, Spiral Computed, Ventricular Function, Left

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To determine left ventricular (LV) volumetric and functional parameters from retrospectively electrocardiographically gated multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) by using semiautomated analysis software and to correlate results with those of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. In 30 patients (mean age, 59.2 years +/- 7.1 [SD]) known to have or suspected of having coronary artery disease, four-channel multi-detector row CT was performed with standard technique, and diastolic and systolic image reconstructions were generated. With commercially available analysis software capable of semiautomated contour detection, end diastolic and end systolic LV volumes were determined from short-axis secondary CT reformations. Steady-state free-precession cine MR images were acquired in short-axis orientation within 48 hours and analyzed by using dedicated software. Bland-Altman analysis was performed to calculate limits of agreement and systematic errors between CT and MR imaging. Mean end diastolic (138.8 mL +/- 31.9) and end systolic (53.9 mL +/- 21.2) LV volumes as determined with CT correlated well with MR imaging measurements (142.0 mL +/- 32.5 [r = 0.93] and 54.9 mL +/- 22.8 [r = 0.94], respectively [P <.001]). LV ejection fraction (61.6% +/- 10.6 for CT vs 62.3% +/- 10.1 for MR imaging; r = 0.89) and stroke volume (84.6 mL +/- 20.9 for CT vs 86.9 mL +/- 21.5 for MR imaging; r = 0.88) also showed good correlation (P <.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed acceptable limits of agreement (+/-9.8% for ejection fraction) without systematic errors. In selected patients, semiautomated analysis software enables LV volumetric and functional analysis based on multi-detector row CT data sets, the results of which correlate well with MR imaging findings. Copyright RSNA, 2004

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article