22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Observer variation in the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

      Human Pathology

      Barrett Esophagus, classification, pathology, Biopsy, Esophageal Diseases, Esophageal Neoplasms, diagnosis

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The potential value of biopsy surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus for dysplasia is diminished by a lack of agreement on the diagnostic criteria for dysplasia. In a preliminary consensus conference, experienced gastrointestinal pathologists from four medical centers agreed on criteria for a five-tiered histologic classification of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus--negative for dysplasia, indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia, and intramucosal carcinoma. Eight morphologists in the four centers tested the criteria for interobserver agreement by examining a set of coded slides that had been chosen to include some especially difficult interpretative problems in all five histologic classifications. Interobserver agreement of 85 and 87% was achieved in successive reviews when the combined group of high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma was compared with the combined group of low-grade dysplasia, indefinite for dysplasia, and negative for dysplasia. Comparison of other groups yielded less agreement. For example, negative for dysplasia could be distinguished from all other diagnoses with an interobserver agreement of 72%. We conclude that experienced gastrointestinal morphologists can diagnose high-grade dysplasia and intramucosal carcinoma with a high degree of agreement and thus can detect those patients who may need immediate rebiopsy or esophageal resection. Either further refinement of histologic criteria or alternate diagnostic methods will be needed to achieve the reproducible diagnosis of indefinite changes and low-grade dysplasia. This is important because patients with such changes theoretically merit closer endoscopic surveillance.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          3343032

          Comments

          Comment on this article