34
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pure seminoma: A review and update

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Pure seminoma is a rare pathology of the young adult, often discovered in the early stages. Its prognosis is generally excellent and many therapeutic options are available, especially in stage I tumors. High cure rates can be achieved in several ways: standard treatment with radiotherapy is challenged by surveillance and chemotherapy. Toxicity issues and the patients' preferences should be considered when management decisions are made. This paper describes firstly the management of primary seminoma and its nodal involvement and, secondly, the various therapeutic options according to stage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: focus on long-term survivors.

          Although second primary cancers are a leading cause of death among men with testicular cancer, few studies have quantified risks among long-term survivors. Within 14 population-based tumor registries in Europe and North America (1943-2001), we identified 40,576 1-year survivors of testicular cancer and ascertained data on any new incident solid tumors among these patients. We used Poisson regression analysis to model relative risks (RRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs) of second solid cancers. All statistical tests were two-sided. A total of 2,285 second solid cancers were reported in the cohort. The relative risk and EAR decreased with increasing age at testicular cancer diagnosis (P < .001); the EAR increased with attained age (P < .001) but the excess RR decreased. Among 10-year survivors diagnosed with testicular cancer at age 35 years, the risk of developing a second solid tumor was increased (RR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8 to 2.1). Risk remained statistically significantly elevated for 35 years (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.0; P < .001). We observed statistically significantly elevated risks, for the first time, for cancers of the pleura (malignant mesothelioma; RR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.7 to 5.9) and esophagus (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.6). Cancers of the lung (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.7), colon (RR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.7 to 2.5), bladder (RR = 2.7, 95% CI = 2.2 to 3.1), pancreas (RR = 3.6, 95% CI = 2.8 to 4.6), and stomach (RR = 4.0, 95% CI = 3.2 to 4.8) accounted for almost 60% of the total excess. Overall patterns were similar for seminoma and nonseminoma patients, with lower risks observed for nonseminoma patients treated after 1975. Statistically significantly increased risks of solid cancers were observed among patients treated with radiotherapy alone (RR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.9 to 2.2), chemotherapy alone (RR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3 to 2.5), and both (RR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.9 to 4.2). For patients diagnosed with seminomas or nonseminomatous tumors at age 35 years, cumulative risks of solid cancer 40 years later (i.e., to age 75 years) were 36% and 31%, respectively, compared with 23% for the general population. Testicular cancer survivors are at statistically significantly increased risk of solid tumors for at least 35 years after treatment. Young patients may experience high levels of risk as they reach older ages. The statistically significantly increased risk of malignant mesothelioma in testicular cancer survivors has, to our knowledge, not been observed previously in a cohort of patients treated with radiotherapy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cardiovascular disease as a long-term complication of treatment for testicular cancer.

            To assess the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and cardiac risk factors in long-term survivors of testicular cancer according to treatment received. All resident male patients registered in the United Kingdom between 1982 and 1992 attending for follow-up were eligible for recruitment. Patients completed a current health questionnaire and underwent clinical review, along with hematologic, biochemical, and hormonal profiles. For patients not under routine review, follow-up information was sought from their general practitioner and mortality data were sought from the Office of National Statistics. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables and comparisons were made among patients treated by orchidectomy and follow-up only, chemotherapy alone (C), radiotherapy alone (RT), and radiotherapy and chemotherapy (C/RT). Data on cardiovascular events were available on 992 patients. After a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 68 events had been reported, including 18 deaths. After adjusting for age, increased risk for cardiac events was seen after C (relative risk [RR] = 2.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15 to 5.84; P =.022), RT (RR = 2.40; 95% CI, 1.04 to 5.45; P =.036), and C/RT (RR = 2.78; 95% CI, 1.09 to 7.07; P =.032). There were no significant differences in cardiac risk factors. On multivariate analysis, age, treatment group, free thyroxine, protein, and magnesium levels were associated with cardiovascular disease. In long-term survivors of testicular cancer, we observed a two-fold or greater risk of developing cardiovascular disease. This was not due to increases in cardiac risk factors, which suggests a direct or indirect treatment effect. These data support the continued research into the minimization of treatment in good-prognosis testicular cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Treatment-specific risks of second malignancies and cardiovascular disease in 5-year survivors of testicular cancer.

              To compare radiotherapy and chemotherapy effects on long-term risks of second malignant neoplasms (SMNs) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in testicular cancer (TC) survivors. In our nationwide cohort comprising 2,707 5-year TC survivors, incidences of SMNs and CVDs were compared with general-population rates by calculating standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs). Treatment effects on risks of SMN and CVD were quantified in multivariable Cox regression and competing risks analyses. After a median follow-up time of 17.6 years, 270 TC survivors developed SMNs. The SIR of SMN overall was 1.7 (95% CI, 1.5 to 1.9), with an AER of 32.3 excess occurrences per 10,000 person-years. SMN risk was 2.6-fold (95% CI, 1.7- to 4.0-fold) increased after subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy and 2.1-fold (95% CI, 1.4- to 3.1-fold) increased after chemotherapy, compared with surgery only. Subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy increased the risk of a major late complication (SMN or CVD) 1.8-fold (95% CI, 1.3- to 2.4-fold), chemotherapy increased the risk of a major late complication 1.9-fold (95% CI, 1.4- to 2.5-fold), and smoking increased the risk of a major late complication 1.7-fold (95% CI, 1.4- to 2.1-fold), compared with surgery only. The median survival time was 1.4 years after SMN and 4.7 years after CVD. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy increased the risk of developing SMN or CVD to a similar extent as smoking. Subdiaphragmatic radiotherapy strongly increases the risk of SMNs but not of CVD, whereas chemotherapy increases the risks of both SMNs and CVDs. Prolonged follow-up after chemotherapy is needed to reliably compare the late complications of radiotherapy and chemotherapy after 20 years.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Radiat Oncol
                Radiation Oncology (London, England)
                BioMed Central
                1748-717X
                2011
                8 August 2011
                : 6
                : 90
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Bugnon 46, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
                [2 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Habib Bourguiba, 3000 Sfax, Tunisia
                [3 ]Department of Pathology, Institut Gustave-Roussy, 94805 Villejuif, France
                [4 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital de Sion-CHCVs, CH-1950 Sion, Switzerland
                [5 ]Department of Pathology, Hôpital HabibThameur, 1089 Tunis, Tunisia
                Article
                1748-717X-6-90
                10.1186/1748-717X-6-90
                3163197
                21819630
                5c97e1a8-bcb0-4179-8352-88a7302c0c23
                Copyright ©2011 Boujelbene et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 7 April 2011
                : 8 August 2011
                Categories
                Review

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                seminoma,treatment,chemotherapy,surveillance,radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                seminoma, treatment, chemotherapy, surveillance, radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article