26
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions : Pluses and minuses of NH4+and NO3−

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references217

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem

          JE Cloern (2001)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Eutrophication and harmful algal blooms: A scientific consensus

            In January 2003, the US Environmental Protection Agency sponsored a “roundtable discussion” to develop a consensus on the relationship between eutrophication and harmful algal blooms (HABs), specifically targeting those relationships for which management actions may be appropriate. Academic, federal, and state agency representatives were in attendance. The following seven statements were unanimously adopted by attendees based on review and analysis of current as well as pertinent previous data: 1) Degraded water quality from increased nutrient pollution promotes the development and persistence of many HABs and is one of the reasons for their expansion in the U.S. and the world; 2) The composition – not just the total quantity – of the nutrient pool impacts HABs; 3) High biomass blooms must have exogenous nutrients to be sustained; 4) Both chronic and episodic nutrient delivery promote HAB development; 5) Recently developed tools and techniques are already improving the detection of some HABs, and emerging technologies are rapidly advancing toward operational status for the prediction of HABs and their toxins; 6) Experimental studies are critical to further the understanding of the role of nutrients in HAB expression, and will strengthen prediction and mitigation of HABs; and 7) Management of nutrient inputs to the watershed can lead to significant reduction in HABs. Supporting evidence and pertinent examples for each consensus statement is provided herein.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment.

              Lake 227, a small lake in the Precambrian Shield at the Experimental Lakes Area (ELA), has been fertilized for 37 years with constant annual inputs of phosphorus and decreasing inputs of nitrogen to test the theory that controlling nitrogen inputs can control eutrophication. For the final 16 years (1990-2005), the lake was fertilized with phosphorus alone. Reducing nitrogen inputs increasingly favored nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria as a response by the phytoplankton community to extreme seasonal nitrogen limitation. Nitrogen fixation was sufficient to allow biomass to continue to be produced in proportion to phosphorus, and the lake remained highly eutrophic, despite showing indications of extreme nitrogen limitation seasonally. To reduce eutrophication, the focus of management must be on decreasing inputs of phosphorus.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Limnology and Oceanography
                Limnol. Oceanogr.
                Wiley
                00243590
                January 2016
                January 2016
                October 11 2015
                : 61
                : 1
                : 165-197
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Horn Point Laboratory; University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science; Cambridge Maryland
                [2 ]Romberg Tiburon Center, San Francisco State University; Tiburon California
                [3 ]Division of Plant Science; University of Dundee at the James Hutton Institute; Invergowrie Dundee UK
                [4 ]Functional Plant Biology and Climate Change Cluster, University of Technology Sydney; Ultimo New South Wales Australia
                [5 ]J. Craig Venter Institute; La Jolla California
                [6 ]Limnology Laboratory, Department of Biology; University of Regina; Regina Saskatchewan Canada
                [7 ]The California Maritime Academy; Vallejo California
                [8 ]Center for Applied Aquatic Ecology, North Carolina State University; Raleigh North Carolina
                Article
                10.1002/lno.10203
                5d4d0637-a7ea-43fe-8e75-3f05775633f1
                © 2015

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article