4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The views of patients, healthcare professionals and hospital officials on barriers to and facilitators of quality pain management in Ethiopian hospitals: A qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Postoperative pain remains a challenge in the developed world, but the consequences of inadequately treated postoperative pain are particularly severe in low- and middle-income countries. Since 2011, reports have drawn attention to the poor quality of postoperative pain management in Ethiopia; however, our multicenter qualitative study was the first to attempt to understand the factors that are barriers to and facilitators of quality pain managment in the country. To this aim, the study explored the perspectives of patients, healthcare professionals, and hospital officials. We expected that the results of this study would inform strategies to improve the provision of quality pain management in Ethiopia and perhaps even in other low- and middle-income countries.

          Methods

          This study used a qualitative, descriptive approach in which nine healthcare professionals, nine patients, and six hospital officials (i.e. executives in a managerial or leadership position in administration, nursing, or education) participated in face-to-face, semi-structured interviews. Thematic data analysis was conducted, and patterns were explained with the help of a theoretical framework.

          Findings

          The barriers identified ranged from healthcare professionals’ lack of empathy to a positive social appraisal of patients’ ability to cope with pain. They also included a lack of emphasis on pain and its management during early medical education, together with the absence of available resources. Enhancing the ability of healthcare professionals to create favorable rapport with patients and increasing the cultural competence of professionals are essential ingredients of future pain education interventions.

          Conclusions

          Barriers to and facilitators of postoperative pain management do not exist independently but are reciprocally linked. This finding calls for holistic and inclusive interventions targeting healthcare professionals, patients, and hospital officials. The current situation is unlikely to improve if only healthcare professionals are educated about pain physiology, pharmacology, and management. Patients should also be educated, and the hospital environment should be modified to provide high-quality postoperative pain management.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Social Cognitive Theory of Organizational Management

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine

              Background The main objective of this methodological manuscript was to illustrate the role of using qualitative research in emergency settings. We outline rigorous criteria applied to a qualitative study assessing perceptions and experiences of staff working in Australian emergency departments. Methods We used an integrated mixed-methodology framework to identify different perspectives and experiences of emergency department staff during the implementation of a time target government policy. The qualitative study comprised interviews from 119 participants across 16 hospitals. The interviews were conducted in 2015–2016 and the data were managed using NVivo version 11. We conducted the analysis in three stages, namely: conceptual framework, comparison and contrast and hypothesis development. We concluded with the implementation of the four-dimension criteria (credibility, dependability, confirmability and transferability) to assess the robustness of the study, Results We adapted four-dimension criteria to assess the rigour of a large-scale qualitative research in the emergency department context. The criteria comprised strategies such as building the research team; preparing data collection guidelines; defining and obtaining adequate participation; reaching data saturation and ensuring high levels of consistency and inter-coder agreement. Conclusion Based on the findings, the proposed framework satisfied the four-dimension criteria and generated potential qualitative research applications to emergency medicine research. We have added a methodological contribution to the ongoing debate about rigour in qualitative research which we hope will guide future studies in this topic in emergency care research. It also provided recommendations for conducting future mixed-methods studies. Future papers on this series will use the results from qualitative data and the empirical findings from longitudinal data linkage to further identify factors associated with ED performance; they will be reported separately. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: ResourcesRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Formal analysisRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Resources
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                14 March 2019
                2019
                : 14
                : 3
                : e0213644
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
                [2 ] Centre for International Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany
                [3 ] Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Munich, Germany
                [4 ] Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Hospital of the University of Munich (LMU), Munich, Germany
                [5 ] Department of Psychiatry, St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
                [6 ] Department of Sociology, College of Social Sciences and Humanity, Jimma, University, Ethiopia
                [7 ] Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Institute of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
                University of Brighton, UNITED KINGDOM
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-354X
                Article
                PONE-D-18-14099
                10.1371/journal.pone.0213644
                6417681
                30870467
                5d4e5893-784b-4f29-83c3-7472631f3c5e
                © 2019 Eshete et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 10 May 2018
                : 26 February 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 20
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009055, Center for International Health;
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005068, Jimma University;
                Award Recipient :
                This study was supported by the Jimma University and CIHLMU Center for International Health, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pain Management
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drugs
                Analgesics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pain Management
                Analgesics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Gynecologic Surgery
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Allied Health Care Professionals
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Patients
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures
                Musculoskeletal System Procedures
                Orthopedic Surgery
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Nurses
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Nurses
                Custom metadata
                Due to ethical restrictions related to protecting patient, healthcare professional and hospital official confidentiality, all relevant and anonymized data are available upon request after ethical approval of the Jimma University Institutional Review Board, Jimma, Ethiopia. Requests can be sent to the board Chairman of the IRB of the Jimma University Dr. Daniel Yilma ( daniel.yilma@ 123456ju.edu.et ) or the corresponding author.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article