49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Where Platform Capitalism and Racial Capitalism Meet: The Sociology of Race and Racism in the Digital Society

      1
      Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
      SAGE Publications

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The study of race and racism in the digital society must produce theoretically distinct and robust formulations of Internet technologies as key characteristics of the political economy. The author puts forth racial capitalism as a coherent framework for this research agenda. The argument for racial capitalism draws on two examples of its engagement with two characteristics of the digital society: obfuscation as privatization and exclusion by inclusion. Internet technologies are now a totalizing sociopolitical regime and should be central to the study of race and racism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Social Implications of the Internet

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found

              What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy

              The rapid growth of the platform economy has provoked scholarly discussion of its consequences for the nature of work and employment. We identify four major themes in the literature on platform work and the underlying metaphors associated with each. Platforms are seen as entrepreneurial incubators, digital cages, accelerants of precarity, and chameleons adapting to their environments. Each of these devices has limitations, which leads us to introduce an alternative image of platforms: as permissive potentates that externalize responsibility and control over economic transactions while still exercising concentrated power. As a consequence, platforms represent a distinct type of governance mechanism, different from markets, hierarchies, or networks, and therefore pose a unique set of problems for regulators, workers, and their competitors in the conventional economy. Reflecting the instability of the platform structure, struggles over regulatory regimes are dynamic and difficult to predict, but they are sure to gain in prominence as the platform economy grows.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
                Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
                SAGE Publications
                2332-6492
                2332-6506
                October 09 2020
                : 233264922094947
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Information and Library Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
                Article
                10.1177/2332649220949473
                5d591ae3-143b-4099-b359-92aaf511ba8e
                © 2020

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article