Blog
About

  • Record: found
  • Abstract: found
  • Article: not found

Tapping the translation potential of cAMP signalling: molecular basis for selectivity in cAMP agonism and antagonism as revealed by NMR.

Biochemical Society Transactions

Read this article at

ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
Bookmark
      There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

      Abstract

      Eukaryotic CBDs (cAMP-binding domains) control multiple cellular functions (e.g. phosphorylation, guanine exchange and ion channel gating). Hence the manipulation of cAMP-dependent signalling pathways has a high translational potential. However, the ubiquity of eukaryotic CBDs also poses a challenge in terms of selectivity. Before the full translational potential of cAMP signalling can be tapped, it is critical to understand the structural basis for selective cAMP agonism and antagonism. Recent NMR investigations have shown that structurally homologous CBDs respond differently to several CBD ligands and that these unexpected differences arise at the level of either binding (i.e. affinity) or allostery (i.e. modulation of the autoinhibitory equilibria). In the present article, we specifically address how the highly conserved CBD fold binds cAMP with markedly different affinities in PKA (protein kinase A) relative to other eukaryotic cAMP receptors, such as Epac (exchange protein directly activated by cAMP) and HCN (hyperpolarization-activated cyclic-nucleotide-modulated channel). A major emerging determinant of cAMP affinity is hypothesized to be the position of the autoinhibitory equilibrium of the apo-CBD, which appears to vary significantly across different CBDs. These analyses may assist the development of selective CBD effectors that serve as potential drug leads for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

      Related collections

      Author and article information

      Journal
      10.1042/BST20130282
      24646235

      Comments

      Comment on this article