8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A P2 and P3 substrate specificity comparison between the Murray Valley encephalitis and West Nile virus NS2B/NS3 protease using C-terminal agmatine dipeptides

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVEV) and the West Nile virus (WNV) are mosquito-borne single-stranded RNA Flaviviruses responsible for many cases of viral encephalitis and deaths worldwide. The former is endemic in north Australia and Papua New Guinea while the latter has spread to different parts of the world and was responsible for a recent North American outbreak in 2012, resulting in 243 fatalities. There is currently no approved vaccines or drugs against MVEV and WNV viral infections. A plausible drug target is the viral non-structural NS2B/NS3 protease due to its role in viral replication. This trypsin-like serine protease recognizes and cleaves viral polyproteins at the C-terminal end of an arginine residue, opening an avenue for the development of peptide-based antivirals. This communication compares the P2 and P3 residue preferences of the MVEV and WNV NS2B/NS3 proteases using a series of C-terminal agmatine dipeptides. Our results revealed that both viral enzymes were highly specific toward lysines at the P2 and P3 positions, suggesting that a peptidomimetic viral protease inhibitor developed against one virus should also be active against the other.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Peptides
          Peptides
          Elsevier BV
          01969781
          February 2014
          February 2014
          : 52
          : 49-52
          Article
          10.1016/j.peptides.2013.12.002
          24333681
          5dd81f0d-5041-457f-92dd-2ccb2c351932
          © 2014
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article