7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Temozolomide combined with irinotecan caused regression in an adult pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude-mouse model

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Adult pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is a rare and recalcitrant, highly-malignant mesenchymal tumor in need of improved therapeutic strategies. Our laboratory pioneered the patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude mouse model with the technique of surgical orthotopic implantation (SOI). We previously described the development of a PDOX model of adult pleomorphic RMS where the tumor behaved similar to the patient donor. A high-grade pleomorphic rhabdomyosarcoma from a striated muscle was previously grown orthotopically in the right biceps-femoris muscle of nude mice to establish the PDOX model. In the present study, the PDOX models were randomized into the following treatment groups when tumor volume reached 100 mm 3: G1, control without treatment; G2, cyclophosphamide (CPA) 140 mg/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection, weekly, for 3 weeks; G3, temozolomide (TEM), 25 mg/kg, per oral (p.o.), daily, for 21 days; G4, temozolomide (TEM) 25 mg/kg, p.o., daily, for 21 days combined with irinotecan (IRN), 4 mg/kg, i.p., daily for 21 days. After 3 weeks, treatment of PDOX with TEM combined with IRN was so powerful that it resulted in tumor regression and the smallest tumor volume compared to other groups. The RMS PDOX model should be of use to design the treatment program for the patient and for drug discovery and evaluation for this recalcitrant tumor type.

          Related collections

          Most cited references41

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interrogating open issues in cancer precision medicine with patient-derived xenografts

          This Opinion article discusses progress and challenges in using patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models in cancer precision medicine. It is primarily co-authored by members of the EurOPDX Consortium and as such highlights the merits of shared PDX resources.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Common musculoskeletal tumors of childhood and adolescence.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Target for cancer therapy: proliferating cells or stem cells.

              Tumor stem cells are quiescent and, therefore, resistant to therapy, yet harbor the capacity to replenish a tumor after therapy. Therefore, it is tempting to explain all therapeutic failures by the persistence of tumor stem cells. Yet, this explanation is relevant only to initial stages of stem-cell-dependent tumors (such as chronic myeloid leukemia) that, actually, are well controlled by therapy. In advanced cancers that poorly respond to therapy, quiescent tumor stem cells play a negligible role. Instead, proliferating cells determine disease progression, prognosis, therapeutic failures, and resistance to therapy. And therapy fails not because it eliminates only proliferating tumor cells, but because it does not eliminate them. With noticeable exceptions, it is the proliferating cell that should be targeted, whereas resting cancer cells including stem and dormant cells need to be targeted only when they 'wake up'. Finally, I discuss a strategy of selectively killing dominant proliferating clones, including proliferating stem-like and drug-resistant cancer cells, while sparing normal cells.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Oncotarget
                Oncotarget
                Oncotarget
                ImpactJ
                Oncotarget
                Impact Journals LLC
                1949-2553
                29 September 2017
                24 March 2017
                : 8
                : 44
                : 75874-75880
                Affiliations
                1 AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA
                2 Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
                3 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
                4 Department of Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                5 Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                6 Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Robert M. Hoffman, all@ 123456anticancer.com
                Article
                16548
                10.18632/oncotarget.16548
                5652670
                5dda32d1-a883-41af-9e3a-3ce226662396
                Copyright: © 2017 Igarashi et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 20 January 2017
                : 27 February 2017
                Categories
                Research Paper

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                rhabdomosarcoma,nude mice,patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (pdox),temozolomide,irinotecan,combination

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content266

                Cited by12

                Most referenced authors359