Blog
About

0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Effect of Vitamin-E-Modified Dialysers on Dialyser Clotting, Erythropoietin and Heparin Dosage: A Comparative Crossover Study

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We performed a crossover study to compare the effects of different dialysis membranes on 20 patients with frequent dialyser clotting and requiring >5,000 units of heparin per dialysis session. Low-flux dialysers are C15NL (cellulose - Terumo) and E15NL (vitamin-E-coated - Terumo) while high-flux dialysers were F60 (polysulphone) and EE15NL (vitamin-E-coated - Terumo). Ten patients underwent dialysis for 2 months with C15NL then switched to E15NL for 2 months. Similarly, the other 10 patients were started on the high-flux dialyser F60 and then switched over to EE15NL for 2 months. The following parameters were measured at the beginning of the study, 2 weeks, 1 month and then at 2 months: hemoglobin, prothrombin time (PT), partial thromboplastin time (PTT), fibrinogen, protein C, protein S, antithrombin III (ATIII) and factor 12 activity. Dialyser clotting, heparin and erythropoietin requirements were assessed during each dialysis session. There was a significant reduction in clotting with E15NL in comparison to C15NL (22.8 +/- 17 and 44.1 +/- 22.8 (p = 0.0233), respectively). Similarly, heparin requirements were less in the vitamin-E-coated (E15NL) dialysers, 4,754 +/- 1,427 vs. 6,011 +/- 856 units (p = 0.0281) and erythropoietin usage was also significantly reduced, 4,630 +/- 2,620 vs. 7,850 +/- 4,069 units (p = 0.049). There was a significant increase in hemoglobin with E15NL compared to C15NL, 115 +/- 10.4 vs. 108 +/- 13.1 (p = 0.0343). When the high-flux dialysers were compared there was a tendency towards less dialyser clotting with the EE15NL compared to F60, though this did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.0561). We could not demonstrate any significant changes between the different dialysers with regards to PT, PTT, fibrinogen factor 12 activity, protein C, protein S and ATIII. In conclusion, we have shown that the use of vitamin-E-modified dialysers is associated with less clotting in patients with persistent clotting problems. In addition, this was associated with less heparin and erythropoietin requirements.

          Related collections

          Most cited references 1

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Current status of antioxidant therapy

            Bookmark

            Author and article information

            Journal
            AJN
            Am J Nephrol
            10.1159/issn.0250-8095
            American Journal of Nephrology
            S. Karger AG
            0250-8095
            1421-9670
            2000
            October 2000
            15 November 2000
            : 20
            : 5
            : 364-368
            Affiliations
            aDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine; bNursing Department, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, and cSaudi Center for Organ Transplantation, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
            Article
            13617 Am J Nephrol 2000;20:364–368
            10.1159/000013617
            11092992
            © 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel

            Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

            Page count
            Tables: 6, References: 16, Pages: 5
            Product
            Self URI (application/pdf): https://www.karger.com/Article/Pdf/13617
            Categories
            Clinical Study

            Comments

            Comment on this article