118
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    12
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Drosophila FoxP Mutants Are Deficient in Operant Self-Learning

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Intact function of the Forkhead Box P2 (FOXP2) gene is necessary for normal development of speech and language. This important role has recently been extended, first to other forms of vocal learning in animals and then also to other forms of motor learning. The homology in structure and in function among the FoxP gene members raises the possibility that the ancestral FoxP gene may have evolved as a crucial component of the neural circuitry mediating motor learning. Here we report that genetic manipulations of the single Drosophila orthologue, dFoxP, disrupt operant self-learning, a form of motor learning sharing several conceptually analogous features with language acquisition. Structural alterations of the dFoxP locus uncovered the role of dFoxP in operant self-learning and habit formation, as well as the dispensability of dFoxP for operant world-learning, in which no motor learning occurs. These manipulations also led to subtle alterations in the brain anatomy, including a reduced volume of the optic glomeruli. RNAi-mediated interference with dFoxP expression levels copied the behavioral phenotype of the mutant flies, even in the absence of mRNA degradation. Our results provide evidence that motor learning and language acquisition share a common ancestral trait still present in extant invertebrates, manifest in operant self-learning. This ‘deep’ homology probably traces back to before the split between vertebrate and invertebrate animals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references96

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Human and rodent homologies in action control: corticostriatal determinants of goal-directed and habitual action.

          Recent behavioral studies in both humans and rodents have found evidence that performance in decision-making tasks depends on two different learning processes; one encoding the relationship between actions and their consequences and a second involving the formation of stimulus-response associations. These learning processes are thought to govern goal-directed and habitual actions, respectively, and have been found to depend on homologous corticostriatal networks in these species. Thus, recent research using comparable behavioral tasks in both humans and rats has implicated homologous regions of cortex (medial prefrontal cortex/medial orbital cortex in humans and prelimbic cortex in rats) and of dorsal striatum (anterior caudate in humans and dorsomedial striatum in rats) in goal-directed action and in the control of habitual actions (posterior lateral putamen in humans and dorsolateral striatum in rats). These learning processes have been argued to be antagonistic or competing because their control over performance appears to be all or none. Nevertheless, evidence has started to accumulate suggesting that they may at times compete and at others cooperate in the selection and subsequent evaluation of actions necessary for normal choice performance. It appears likely that cooperation or competition between these sources of action control depends not only on local interactions in dorsal striatum but also on the cortico-basal ganglia network within which the striatum is embedded and that mediates the integration of learning with basic motivational and emotional processes. The neural basis of the integration of learning and motivation in choice and decision-making is still controversial and we review some recent hypotheses relating to this issue.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language disorder.

            Individuals affected with developmental disorders of speech and language have substantial difficulty acquiring expressive and/or receptive language in the absence of any profound sensory or neurological impairment and despite adequate intelligence and opportunity. Although studies of twins consistently indicate that a significant genetic component is involved, most families segregating speech and language deficits show complex patterns of inheritance, and a gene that predisposes individuals to such disorders has not been identified. We have studied a unique three-generation pedigree, KE, in which a severe speech and language disorder is transmitted as an autosomal-dominant monogenic trait. Our previous work mapped the locus responsible, SPCH1, to a 5.6-cM interval of region 7q31 on chromosome 7 (ref. 5). We also identified an unrelated individual, CS, in whom speech and language impairment is associated with a chromosomal translocation involving the SPCH1 interval. Here we show that the gene FOXP2, which encodes a putative transcription factor containing a polyglutamine tract and a forkhead DNA-binding domain, is directly disrupted by the translocation breakpoint in CS. In addition, we identify a point mutation in affected members of the KE family that alters an invariant amino-acid residue in the forkhead domain. Our findings suggest that FOXP2 is involved in the developmental process that culminates in speech and language.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language.

              Language is a uniquely human trait likely to have been a prerequisite for the development of human culture. The ability to develop articulate speech relies on capabilities, such as fine control of the larynx and mouth, that are absent in chimpanzees and other great apes. FOXP2 is the first gene relevant to the human ability to develop language. A point mutation in FOXP2 co-segregates with a disorder in a family in which half of the members have severe articulation difficulties accompanied by linguistic and grammatical impairment. This gene is disrupted by translocation in an unrelated individual who has a similar disorder. Thus, two functional copies of FOXP2 seem to be required for acquisition of normal spoken language. We sequenced the complementary DNAs that encode the FOXP2 protein in the chimpanzee, gorilla, orang-utan, rhesus macaque and mouse, and compared them with the human cDNA. We also investigated intraspecific variation of the human FOXP2 gene. Here we show that human FOXP2 contains changes in amino-acid coding and a pattern of nucleotide polymorphism, which strongly suggest that this gene has been the target of selection during recent human evolution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2014
                25 June 2014
                : 9
                : 6
                : e100648
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Inst. Biol. – Behavioral Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [2 ]Inst. Biol. – Neurobiology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
                [3 ]Neuroethology, Max-Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany
                [4 ]Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America
                [5 ]Institut für Zoologie - Neurogenetik, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
                Tohoku University, Japan
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: BB. Performed the experiments: EM JC JR BB. Analyzed the data: CS BB JR JC EM. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TZ HP. Wrote the paper: BB CS. Have seen and commented on the manuscript: EM JC JR HP TZ CS BB.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-10947
                10.1371/journal.pone.0100648
                4070984
                24964149
                5e714f9d-c396-4432-9ca4-8d5e6e178e93
                Copyright @ 2014

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 17 April 2012
                : 29 May 2014
                Page count
                Pages: 15
                Funding
                This study was funded by the research commission of the FU Berlin (to HJP and CS) and the DFG (BR 1892/6-1 and BR 1892/7-1 to BB). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Nervous System
                Motor System
                Neuroanatomy
                Evolutionary Biology
                Genetics
                Gene Function
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognition
                Animal Cognition
                Decision Making
                Behavioral Neuroscience
                Cognitive Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Neuroethology
                Neuropsychology
                Psychology
                Behavior
                Habits
                Verbal Behavior
                Experimental Psychology
                Zoology
                Animal Behavior
                Social Sciences
                Linguistics
                Speech

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article