6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Predictors of response to amine-specific antidepressants

      , , , , , , ,
      Journal of Affective Disorders
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Discriminant function analysis of data from a double-blind comparative trial of lofepramine (a noradrenaline-specific reuptake inhibitor) and fluoxetine (a serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitor), involving 183 patients was used to identify predictors of response. Psychic anxiety significantly predicted a positive response to antidepressant medication, whereas psychomotor retardation, observed sadness, subjective lassitude and somatic complaints were significant predictors of nonresponse. Age, gender, endogenicity, duration of illness and number of previous episodes were not predictive of response. Significant differences were found between predictors of response to fluoxetine and lofepramine (P < 0.001 all groups). Predictors of response to lofepramine were similar to overall predictors, i.e., psychic anxiety predicted responders whilst observed sadness, psychomotor retardation, lassitude, inability to feel and somatic complaints predicted nonresponders. In contrast, baseline weight loss predicted response to fluoxetine, whereas anxiety, reduced insight and a tendency to blame others significantly predicted nonresponse. Such findings have practical implications for the management of depressive illness.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Journal of Affective Disorders
          Journal of Affective Disorders
          Elsevier BV
          01650327
          December 1995
          December 1995
          : 35
          : 3
          : 97-106
          Article
          10.1016/0165-0327(95)00039-9
          8749837
          5e80260b-5c88-4b65-8e22-3fe0862a73c6
          © 1995

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article