0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      51.17 TELEHEALTH IN THE TIME OF COVID-19: EXPERIENCE FROM THE CONSORTIUM OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMS FOR TELEHEALTH

      abstract

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives The objective of this presentation is to describe the rapid transition of academic outpatient clinics to home-based telehealth (HBTH) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Telehealth (TH) includes the use of both telephone and videoconferencing in order to continue to safely deliver services during COVID-19. TH has entered mainstream mental health care, but most academic programs have not included HBTH, nor other TH opportunities, in their training. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed an important role for HBTH in delivering care during crises, as well as for updating training programs. Methods We describe the activities of a consortium of 8 North American academic programs that rapidly transitioned their outpatient clinics to HBTH. Each program completed a Qualtrics survey, reporting site-specific facilitators and barriers to rapid implementation, including patient populations, regulations, reimbursement, numbers of faculty and trainees, training of clinicians, and technology platforms. Descriptive statistics are reported. Results The sites were 50% public and 89% hospital based, and they served a mean of 38% Medicaid-insured patients. The patient populations were diverse in race/ethnicity and primary language. Prior to COVID-19, 78% provided TH and 33% allowed HBTH. Zoom was the most commonly used platform (56%); 33% identified software licensing as a barrier to TH ramp-up. The primary platforms were 100% HIPAA compliant, 33% integrated with interpreter services, and 33% integrated with electronic health records. Sites identified a lack of access to necessary technology or internet (78%), insufficient reimbursement (56%), patient/parent comfort with technology (56%), and patient/parent reluctance to participate (56%) as the most common barriers to HBTH. Site-specific barriers and facilitators were identified. Conclusions HBTH is a crucial service model to deliver mental health care to youth and families during crises. TH, including HBTH, is here to stay. Ramping up to implement HBTH during a crisis will encounter challenges that many academic programs are ill prepared to address acutely. Academic programs should train their faculty and learners in HBTH now to prepare for predicted future crises, as well as for the future virtual practice of mental health care generally. Best-practices protocols are needed to help programs to develop state-of-the-art HBTH services. TVM, AC, DS

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
          J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
          Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
          Published by Elsevier Inc.
          0890-8567
          1527-5418
          16 October 2020
          October 2020
          16 October 2020
          : 59
          : 10
          : S256
          Affiliations
          [2]Seattle Children’s Hospital/University of Washington
          Article
          S0890-8567(20)31828-1
          10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.427
          7567470
          5e816318-fbac-48df-b386-394490930024
          Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.

          Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.

          History
          Categories
          Article

          Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
          Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry

          Comments

          Comment on this article