18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A prospective cohort study of the use of domiciliary intravenous antibiotics in bronchiectasis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background:

          We introduced domiciliary intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy in patients with bronchiectasis to promote patient-centred domiciliary treatment instead of hospital inpatient treatment.

          Aim:

          To assess the efficacy and safety of domiciliary IV antibiotic therapy in patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis.

          Methods:

          In this prospective study conducted over 5 years, we assessed patients’ eligibility for receiving domiciliary treatment. All patients received 14 days of IV antibiotic therapy and were monitored at baseline/day 7/day 14. We assessed the treatment outcome, morbidity, mortality and 30-day readmission rates.

          Results:

          A total of 116 patients received 196 courses of IV antibiotics. Eighty courses were delivered as inpatient treatment, 32 as early supported discharge (ESD) and 84 as domiciliary therapy. There was significant clinical and quality of life improvement in all groups, with resolution of infection in 76% in the inpatient group, 80% in the ESD group and 80% in the domiciliary group. Morbidity was recorded in 13.8% in the inpatient group, 9.4% in the ESD group and 14.2% in the domiciliary IV group. No mortality was recorded in either group. Thirty-day readmission rates were 13.8% in the inpatient group, 12.5% in the ESD group and 14.2% in the domiciliary group. Total bed days saved was 1443.

          Conclusion:

          Domiciliary IV antibiotic therapy in bronchiectasis is clinically effective and was safe in our cohort of patients.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction.

          The aim was to develop a standardised and externally paced field walking test, incorporating an incremental and progressive structure, to assess functional capacity in patients with chronic airways obstruction. The usefulness of two different shuttle walking test protocols was examined in two separate groups of patients. The initial 10 level protocol (group A, n = 10) and a subsequent, modified, 12 level protocol (group B, n = 10) differed in the number of increments and in the speeds of walking. Patients performed three shuttle walking tests one week apart. Then the performance of patients (group C, n = 15) in the six minute walking test was compared with that in the second (modified) shuttle walking test protocol. Heart rate was recorded during all the exercise tests with a short range telemetry device. The 12 level modified protocol provided a measure of functional capacity in patients with a wide range of disability and was reproducible after just one practice walk; the mean difference between trial 2 v 3 was -2.0 (95% CI -21.9 to 17.9) m. There was a significant relation between the distance walked in the six minute walking test and the shuttle walking test (rho = 0.68) but the six minute walking test appeared to overestimate the extent of disability in some patients. The shuttle test provoked a graded cardiovascular response not evident in the six minute test. Moreover, the maximal heart rates attained were significantly higher for the shuttle walking test than for the six minute test. The shuttle walking test constitutes a standardised incremental field walking test that provokes a symptom limited maximal performance. It provides an objective measurement of disability and allows direct comparison of patients' performance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Randomised controlled trial of intravenous antibiotic treatment for cellulitis at home compared with hospital.

            To compare the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of treatment with intravenous antibiotics for cellulitis at home and in hospital. Prospective randomised controlled trial. Christchurch, New Zealand. 200 patients presenting or referred to the only emergency department in Christchurch who were thought to require intravenous antibiotic treatment for cellulitis and who did not have any contraindications to home care were randomly assigned to receive treatment either at home or in hospital. Days to no advancement of cellulitis was the primary outcome measure. Days on intravenous and oral antibiotics, days in hospital or in the home care programme, complications, degree of functioning and pain, and satisfaction with site of care were also recorded. The two treatment groups did not differ significantly for the primary outcome of days to no advancement of cellulitis, with a mean of 1.50 days (SD 0.11) for the group receiving treatment at home and 1.49 days (SD 0.10) for the group receiving treatment in hospital (mean difference 0.01 days, 95% confidence interval -0.3 to 0.28). None of the other outcome measures differed significantly except for patients' satisfaction, which was greater in patients treated at home. Treatment of cellulitis requiring intravenous antibiotics can be safely delivered at home. Patients prefer home treatment, but in this study only about one third of patients presenting at hospital for intravenous treatment of cellulitis were considered suitable for home treatment.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Hospitalist to home: outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy at an academic center.

              The cost of health care in the United States continues to increase as an aging population places increasing demands on institutions providing health care. Moreover, despite increases in the complexity and cost of health care, reimbursement for some services has been reduced or denied. Thus, the current challenge at many hospitals throughout the United States is to deliver high-quality health care while maximizing resource use and reducing costs without compromising clinical outcomes. We describe an answer to the challenge that combines 2 emerging treatment models in an academic setting: hospital-based physicians and outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                NPJ Prim Care Respir Med
                NPJ Prim Care Respir Med
                NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
                Nature Publishing Group
                2055-1010
                23 October 2014
                2014
                : 24
                : 14090
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Centre for Inflammation Research, Queen’s Medical Research Institute , Edinburgh, UK
                [2 ] Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK
                [3 ] Department of Physiotherapy (Respiratory Medicine), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK
                [4 ] Department of Pharmacy (Respiratory Medicine), Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, UK
                Author notes
                Article
                npjpcrm201490
                10.1038/npjpcrm.2014.90
                4373503
                25340361
                5eb9c063-8227-434f-984c-1c4ea84e51cd
                Copyright © 2014 Primary Care Respiratory Society UK/Macmillan Publishers Limited

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

                History
                : 13 March 2014
                : 17 June 2014
                : 30 August 2014
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article