23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Current Practice in Diagnosis and Treatment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Childhood: A Survey from Turkey

      research-article
      1 , * , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 10 , 14 , 15 , , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 11 , 22 , 6 , 23 , 5 , 22 , 24 , 1
      Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology
      Galenos Publishing
      Survey, Growth hormone deficiency, childhood

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective:

          Approaches to diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children vary among countries and even among centers in the same country. This survey, aiming to facilitate the process of preparing the new consensus on GHD by the Turkish Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Society, was designed to evaluate the current practices in diagnosis and treatment of GHD in different centers in Turkey.

          Methods:

          A questionnaire covering relevant items for diagnosis and treatment of GHD was sent out to all pediatric endocrinology centers.

          Results:

          Twenty-four centers returned the questionnaire. The most frequently used GH stimulation test was L-dopa, followed by clonidine. Eighteen centers used a GH cut-off value of 10 ng/mL for the diagnosis of GHD; this value was 7 ng/mL in 4 centers and 5 ng/mL in 2 centers. The most frequently used assay was immunochemiluminescence for determination of GH, insulin-like growth factor-1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 concentrations. Sex steroid priming in both sexes was used by 19 centers. The most frequently used starting dose of recombinant human GH (rhGH) in prepubertal children was 0.025-0.030 mg/kg/day and 0.030-0.035 mg/kg/day in pubertal children. Growth velocity was used in the evaluation for growth response to rhGH therapy in all centers. Anthropometric measurements of patients every 3-6 months, fasting blood glucose, bone age and thyroid panel evaluation were used by all centers at follow-up. Main indications for cessation of therapy were decreased height velocity and advanced bone age. Fourteen centers used combined treatment (rhGH and gonadotropin-releasing analogues) to increase final height.

          Conclusion:

          Although conformity was found among centers in Turkey in current practice, it is very important to update guideline statements and to modify, if needed, the approach to GHD over time in accordance with new evidence-based clinical studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references28

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: summary statement of the GH Research Society. GH Research Society.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Update of guidelines for the use of growth hormone in children: the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrinology Society Drug and Therapeutics Committee.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reliability of provocative tests to assess growth hormone secretory status. Study in 472 normally growing children.

              The reliability of provocative stimuli of GH secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency is still controversial. Until now, normative values of GH response to various stimuli have not been established properly. In 472 children and adolescents with normal stature (n = 295, height SDS range -1.5 to 1.2) or normal short stature (n = 177, height SDS range -3.7 to -1.8), we studied the GH response to physical exercise, insulin-induced hypoglycemia, arginine (ARG), clonidine, levodopa, glucagon, pyridostigmine (PD), GHRH, PD + GHRH, and ARG + GHRH. The peak GH responses (range) to various stimuli were: 1) physical exercise: 3.0-28.3 micrograms/L; 2) insulin-induced hypoglycemia: 2.7-46.4 micrograms/L; 3) ARG: 0.5-48.4 micrograms/L; 4) clonidine: 3.8-86.0 micrograms/L; 5) levodopa: 1.9-40.0 micrograms/L; 6) glucagon: 1.9-49.5 micrograms/L; 7) PD: 2.5-35.0 micrograms/L; 8) GHRH: 2.7-102.7 micrograms/L; 9)PD + GHRH: 19.6-106.0 micrograms/L; and 10) ARG + GHRH: 19.4-120.0 micrograms/L. Our results show that all conventional stimuli of GH secretion frequently failed to increase GH levels, showing values lower than that arbitrarily assumed, so far, as minimum normal GH peak, i.e. 7 or 10 micrograms/L. When combined with PD or ARG (substances inhibiting hypothalamic somatostatin release), GHRH becomes the most powerful test to explore the secretory capacity of somatotrope cells (the GH response being always higher than 19 micrograms/L). Therefore, only GHRH combined with PD or ARG may be able to clearly differentiate normal children from patients with GH deficiency, though a normal GH response to these tests cannot rule out the existence of GH hyposecretory state because of hypothalamic dysfunction.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol
                J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol
                JCRPE
                Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology
                Galenos Publishing
                1308-5727
                1308-5735
                March 2015
                5 March 2015
                : 7
                : 1
                : 37-44
                Affiliations
                [1 ] İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey
                [2 ] Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital, Clinic of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey
                [3 ] Düzce University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Düzce, Turkey
                [4 ] Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Konya, Turkey
                [5 ] Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey
                [6 ] Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ankara, Turkey
                [7 ] Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ankara, Turkey
                [8 ] Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Antalya, Turkey
                [9 ] Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İzmir, Turkey
                [10 ] Tepecik Educational and Research Hospital, Clinic of Pediatric Endocrinology, İzmir, Turkey
                [11 ] Bezmialem Vakıf University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey
                [12 ] Ege University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İzmir, Turkey
                [13 ] Dr. Behçet Uz Children Disease and Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Pediatric Endocrinology, İzmir, Turkey
                [14 ] Celal Bayar University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Manisa, Turkey
                [15 ] Fırat University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Elazığ, Turkey
                [16 ] Göztepe Educational and Research Hospital, Clinic of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turke
                [17 ] Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Samsun, Turkey
                [18 ] Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Gaziantep, Turkey
                [19 ] Erciyes University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Kayseri, Turkey
                [20 ] American Hospital, Clinic of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey
                [21 ] Diyarbakır Children’s State Hospital and Diyarbakır Training and Research Hospital, Diyarbakır, Turkey
                [22 ] Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Ankara, Turkey
                [23 ] Osman Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Eskişehir, Turkey
                [24 ] Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Adana, Turkey
                Author notes
                * Address for Correspondence: İstanbul University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, İstanbul, Turkey Phone: +90 414 20 00/31645 E-mail: sukranpoyrazoglu@ 123456yahoo.com
                Article
                1401
                10.4274/jcrpe.1794
                4439890
                25800474
                5ecccc57-329f-4d65-bcfe-88c4bdf50caf
                © Journal of Clinical Research in Pediatric Endocrinology, Published by Galenos Publishing.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 December 2014
                : 5 January 2015
                Categories
                Original Article

                Pediatrics
                survey,growth hormone deficiency,childhood
                Pediatrics
                survey, growth hormone deficiency, childhood

                Comments

                Comment on this article