21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Predictors of short and long term outcome in patellofemoral pain syndrome: a prospective longitudinal study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFP) is a common musculoskeletal condition that has a tendency to become chronic and problematic in a proportion of affected individuals. The objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors that may have clinical utility in predicting poor outcome on measures of pain and function in individuals with PFP.

          Methods

          A prospective follow-up study was conducted of 179 participants in a randomised clinical trial. Nine baseline factors (age, gender, body mass index, arch height, duration of knee pain, worst pain visual analogue scale, Kujala Patellofemoral Score (KPS), functional index questionnaire (FIQ), step down repetitions) were investigated for their prognostic ability on outcome assessed at six, 12 and 52 weeks (worst pain, KPS and FIQ). Factors with significant univariate associations were entered into multivariate linear regression models to identify a group of factors independently associated with poor outcome.

          Results

          Long symptom duration was the most consistent predictor of poor outcome over 52 weeks rated on the KPS and the FIQ (β-0.07, 95% confidence interval -0.1 to -0.03, p < 0.000; and -0.02, -0.03 to -0.01, p < 0.000, respectively). Worse KPS at baseline was predictive of outcome at six, 12 and 52 weeks. Gender, body mass index and arch height were generally not associated with outcome (univariate analysis), while age, worst pain, FIQ and step downs were excluded during multivariate analyses.

          Conclusions

          Patients presenting with PFP of long duration who score worse on the KPS have a poorer prognosis, irrespective of age, gender and morphometry. These results suggest that strategies aimed at preventing chronicity of more severe PFP may optimise prognosis.

          Related collections

          Most cited references32

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Scoring of patellofemoral disorders.

          A new questionnaire was used to evaluate subjective symptoms and functional limitations in patellofemoral disorders. The questionnaire was completed independently by four groups of female subjects: controls (N = 17), and subjects with anterior knee pain (N = 16), patellar subluxation (N = 16), and patellar dislocation (N = 19). The questionnaire mean scores for the groups were 100, 83, 68, and 62 points, respectively (p < 0.0001). The items dealing with abnormal painful patellar movements (subluxations) (p < 0.0001), limp (p < 0.0001), pain (p < 0.0001), running (p < 0.0001), climbing stairs (p < 0.0001), and prolonged sitting with the knees flexed (p < 0.0001) differentiated the study groups most clearly. We recommend that these questions be asked when taking a standardized clinical history of an anterior knee pain patient. We also analyzed lateral patellar tilt and displacement by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 28 subjects with patellar subluxation or dislocation. Low questionnaire sum score correlated best with increased lateral patellar tilt measured during quadriceps contraction in 0 degree knee flexion. It seems that a tendency to lateral patellar tilt during quadriceps contraction causes anterior knee pain and can be imaged in knee extension when the patella is not fully supported by femoral condyles.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Analysis of outcome measures for persons with patellofemoral pain: which are reliable and valid?

            To examine the test-retest reliability, validity, and responsiveness of several outcome measures in the treatment of patellofemoral pain. Evaluation of the clinimetric properties of individual outcome measures for patellofemoral pain treatment, using data collected from a previously published randomized controlled trial (RCT). General community and private practice. The data from 71 persons enrolled in an RCT of a conservative intervention for patellofemoral pain were used to evaluate the measures' validity and responsiveness. A subset of this cohort (n=20) was used to assess reliability. Not applicable. Three 10-cm visual analog scales (VASs) for usual pain (VAS-U), worst pain (VAS-W), and pain on 6 aggravating activities (walking, running, squatting, sitting, ascending and descending stairs) (VAS-activity); the Functional Index Questionnaire (FIQ); the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS); and the global rating of change. The test-retest reliability ranged from poor (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.49) to good (ICC=.83), and the measures correlated moderately with each other (r range,.56-.72). Median change scores differed significantly between improved and unimproved persons for all measures. The effect sizes for VAS-U (.79), VAS-W (.88), and the AKPS (.98) were large, indicating greater responsiveness than the FIQ (.37) and VAS-activity (.66). Similarly, the AKPS and VAS-W were the most efficient measures for detecting a treatment effect when compared with a reference measure (VAS-U, which was assigned a value of 1). The minimal difference that patients or clinicians consider clinically important for the AKPS is 10 (out of 100) points and for the VAS it is 2cm (out of 10cm). The AKPS and VAS for usual or worst pain are reliable, valid, and responsive and are therefore recommended for future clinical trials or clinical practice in assessing treatment outcome in persons with patellofemoral pain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

              Estimating the future course of musculoskeletal pain is an important consideration in the primary care consultation for patients and healthcare professionals. Studies of prognostic indicators tend to have been viewed in relation to each site separately, however, an alternative view is that some prognostic indicators may be common across different sites of musculoskeletal pain. To identify generic prognostic indicators for patients with musculoskeletal pain in primary care. Systematic review. Observational cohort studies in primary care. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO and CINAHL electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2006. Inclusion criteria were that the study was a primary care-based cohort, published in English and contained information on prognostic indicators for musculoskeletal conditions. Forty-five studies were included. Eleven factors, assessed at baseline, were found to be associated with poor outcome at follow up for at least two different regional pain complaints: higher pain severity at baseline, longer pain duration, multiple-site pain, previous pain episodes, anxiety and/or depression, higher somatic perceptions and/or distress, adverse coping strategies, low social support, older age, higher baseline disability, and greater movement restriction. Despite substantial heterogeneity in the design and analysis of original studies, this review has identified potential generic prognostic indicators that may be useful when assessing any regional musculoskeletal pain complaint. However, Its unclear whether these indicators, used alone, or in combination, can correctly estimate the likely course of individual patients' problems. Further research is needed, particularly in peripheral joint pain and using assessment methods feasible for routine practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Musculoskelet Disord
                BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
                BioMed Central
                1471-2474
                2010
                19 January 2010
                : 11
                : 11
                Affiliations
                [1 ]School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
                [2 ]National ICT Australia, Melbourne School of Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
                [3 ]School of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
                Article
                1471-2474-11-11
                10.1186/1471-2474-11-11
                2823664
                20082723
                5efad444-808c-4ac3-9bd4-056667b2c677
                Copyright ©2010 Collins et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 18 August 2009
                : 19 January 2010
                Categories
                Research article

                Orthopedics
                Orthopedics

                Comments

                Comment on this article