14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Views and perceptions about locally manufactured medicines in Ethiopia: a qualitative study of physicians, patients and regulatory authorities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Because of their cost, the use of locally produced, bioequivalent, generic drugs is universally recommended. In Ethiopia. while the government is committed to raising the market share and use of locally produced drugs, the process is hampered by the lack of a bioequivalence testing centre to strengthen the regulatory environment and deliver quality-assured local medicines. The purpose of this study is to assess the views and perceptions of key regulatory stakeholders, physicians and patients about locally produced generic medicines.

          Methods

          A descriptive qualitative study, using focus group discussions and key informant interviews, was conducted. Five key informant interviews (two senior regulatory authority members and 3 institutional review board members) as well as 4 focus group discussions (2 with physicians and 2 with patients) were held. Data were analysed using an inductive, thematic process.

          Results

          Four major themes emerged: awareness of lack of bioequivalence profiles associated with local medicines, perceptions about the quality and effectiveness of local medicines, quality and efficacy of imported medicines from developing countries and quality and efficacy of cheaper medicines. All institutional review board members were aware of bioequivalence issues. However, many physicians lacked detailed knowledge about bioequivalence, its clinical relevance and the lack of bioequivalence data for local medicines. All institutional review board members, physicians and male patients, but not female patients, were concerned about the quality and effectiveness of local medicines. Female patients were more confident about the locally produced drugs. In addition, some physicians and patients were not confident about the quality and effectiveness of cheaper drugs and drugs imported from developing countries. Government officials believed that local drugs are reliable.

          Conclusion

          The success of promoting the use of inexpensive local medicines and changing the perception of the community depends not only on increasing the domestic market share held by local companies, but also on the capacity of the regulatory environment and companies to produce quality assured medicines and to overcome misconceptions. Among other initiatives, establishing an accredited bioequivalence centre in the country needs to be addressed urgently.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Potential savings from substituting generic drugs for brand-name drugs: medical expenditure panel survey, 1997-2000.

          Generic substitution is one mechanism of curtailing prescription drug expenditures. Limited information is available about the potential savings associated with generic substitution. To estimate the potential savings associated with broad substitution of generic drugs. Cross-sectional, nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults. United States. Adults included in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Household Component, 1997-2000. Use of a multisource drug (that is, a drug available in a brand-name and > or =1 generic formulation) or a generic drug and the potential cost savings associated with broad generic substitution for all multisource products. Fifty-six percent of all outpatient drugs were multisource products, accounting for 41% of total outpatient drug expenditures. Of these multisource drugs, 61% were dispensed as a generic. If a generic had been substituted for all corresponding brand-name outpatient drugs in 2000, the median annual savings in drug expenditures per person would have been 45.89 dollars (interquartile range, 10.35 dollars to 158.06) for adults younger than 65 years of age and 78.05 dollars (interquartile range, 19.94 dollars to 241.72 dollars) for adults at least 65 years of age. In these age groups, the national savings would have been 5.9 billion dollars (95% CI, 5.5 billion dollars to 6.2 billion dollars) and 2.9 billion dollars (CI, 2.6 billion dollars to 3.1 billion dollars), respectively, representing approximately 11% of drug expenditures. Specific information about an individual's formulary was not available, so the authors could not estimate how much of the potential savings would benefit an individual or his or her health plan. Although broad substitution of generic drugs would affect only a modest percentage of drug expenditures, it could result in substantial absolute savings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Policies to promote use of generic medicines in low and middle income countries: a review of published literature, 2000-2010.

            Review the literature on the impact of policies designed to enhance uptake of generic medicines in low and middle income countries (LMICs). We searched for publications related to generic medicines policies (January 2000-March 2010) and did a bibliometric, descriptive analysis of the dataset in addition to an analysis of studies evaluating the impact of pro-generic policies. We repeated a subset of this larger search in January 2012. Of the 4994 articles screened, 315 (6.3%) full-text publications were related to generic medicines policies. Of these 315, 236 (75%) dealt with generic medicine policies in high-income countries, and 79 (25%) with policies in LMICs. In total, we found only 10 evaluation studies looking at the impact of competition, trade, pricing and prescribing policies on generic medicine price and/or volume. Key barriers to implementing generic medicine policies in LMICs are negative perceptions of stakeholders (e.g., generics are of lower quality) plus perverse private sector financial incentives to sell products with the highest profit margin. Other relevant barriers are legal/regulatory, such as the absence of generic substitution regulations. There also exists a general difficulty in promoting generics due to a lack of transparency in the pharmaceutical supply and distribution system, for example, a lack of price information provided by health care provider organizations to physicians. There is little policy evaluation to determine which pro-generic policies increase generic medicines utilization in LMICs. Ensuring a functioning medicines regulation authority, creating a reasonably robust market of generic medicines and aligning incentives for physicians, consumers and drug sellers are necessary prerequisites for increasing the uptake and use of generic medicines. Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              The experiences of implementing generic medicine policy in eight countries: A review and recommendations for a successful promotion of generic medicine use

              Generic medicines are clinically interchangeable with original brand medicines and have the same quality, efficacy and safety profiles. They are, nevertheless, much cheaper in price. Thus, while providing the same therapeutic outcomes, generic medicines lead to substantial savings for healthcare systems. Therefore, the quality use of generic medicines is promoted in many countries. In this paper, we reviewed the role of generic medicines in healthcare systems and the experiences of promoting the use of generic medicines in eight selected countries, namely the United States (US), the United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, Finland, Australia, Japan, Malaysia and Thailand. The review showed that there are different main policies adopted to promote generic medicines such as generic substitution in the US, generic prescribing in the UK and mandatory generic substitution in Sweden and Finland. To effectively and successfully implement the main policy, different complementary policies and initiatives were necessarily introduced. Barriers to generic medicine use varied between countries from negative perceptions about generic medicines to lack of a coherent generic medicine policy, while facilitators included availability of information about generic medicines to both healthcare professionals and patients, brand interchangeability guidelines, regulations that support generic substitution by pharmacists, and incentives to both healthcare professionals and patients.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +251-942207528 , c.alemayehu@uq.edu.au
                +61-7 33811363 , g.mitchell@uq.edu.au
                +61-73346 5025 , uqjnikle@uq.edu.au
                (+251)-113483752 , aseffaa@gmail.com
                +61-7334-61979 , a.clavarino@pharmacy.uq.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Serv Res
                BMC Health Services Research
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6963
                8 August 2018
                8 August 2018
                2018
                : 18
                : 624
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, GRID grid.1003.2, Faculty of Medicine, , The University of Queensland, ; P.O. Box: 78 Scott road, Brisbane, 4006 Australia
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, GRID grid.1003.2, UQCCR, , The University of Queensland, ; Brisbane, 4029 Australia
                [3 ]Armauer Hanson Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9320 7537, GRID grid.1003.2, School of Pharmacy, , The University of Queensland, ; Brisbane, Australia
                Article
                3410
                10.1186/s12913-018-3410-5
                6083528
                30089496
                5f0fcf83-b4b0-4e4c-85a3-e39743296fef
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 21 April 2018
                : 23 July 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001794, University of Queensland;
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Health & Social care
                local generic medicines,lack of bioequivalence data,perceptions,ethiopia
                Health & Social care
                local generic medicines, lack of bioequivalence data, perceptions, ethiopia

                Comments

                Comment on this article