78
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Microleakage and Micrographic Evaluation of Composite Restorations with Various Bases over ZOE Layer in Pulpotomized Primary Molars

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Zinc oxide eugenol (ZOE) under composite restorations should be covered with a suitable material in order to prevent the harmful effect of ZOE on the composite. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate microleakage of composite restorations in pulpotomized primary molars with different bases for covering the ZOE layer and to assess the distance between different layers.

          Materials and Methods

          Proximo-occlusal cavities were prepared in 78 extracted second primary molars. Carious lesions were removed and pulpotomy was carried out. Zinc oxide eugenol paste was placed in 2-mm thickness. The teeth were randomly divided in 6 groups and restored as follows: 1. Light-cured composite; 2. Resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin; 3. Glass-ionomer and composite resin; 4. Light-cured calcium hydroxide and composite resin; 5. Calcium hydroxide and composite resin; 6. Amalgam and composite resin. The restored specimens were thermocycled for 500 cycles (5°C/55°C) and microleakage was assessed by dye penetration technique. Three specimens from each group were processed for scanning electron microscope evaluation to determine the distance between the layers. The results were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests.

          Results

          Microleakage assessment revealed significant differences between the groups (P=0.04), with the amalgam group exhibiting the lowest microleakage values. In SEM micrographs no significant differences were observed in the distance between ZOE base layers (P=0.94) and base-composite layers (P=0.47); however, the amalgam group had the lowest distances.

          Conclusion

          The use of amalgam over zinc oxide eugenol layer in pulpotomized primary molars decreases microleakage.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The use of stainless steel crowns.

          N Seale (2015)
          The stainless steel crown (SSC) is an extremely durable restoration with several clear-cut indications for use in primary teeth including: following a pulpotomy/pulpectomy; for teeth with developmental defects or large carious lesions involving multiple surfaces where an amalgam is likely to fail; and for fractured teeth. In other situations, its use is less clear cut, and caries risk factors, restoration longevity and cost effectiveness are considerations in decisions to use the SSC. The literature on caries risk factors in young children indicates that children at high risk exhibiting anterior tooth decay and/or molar caries may benefit by treatment with stainless steel crowns to protect the remaining at-risk tooth surfaces. Studies evaluating restoration longevity, including the durability and lifespan of SSCs and Class II amalgams demonstrate the superiority of SSCs for both parameters. Children with extensive decay, large lesions or multiple surface lesions in primary molars should be treated with stainless steel crowns. Because of the protection from future decay provided by their feature of full coverage and their increased durability and longevity, strong consideration should be given to the use of SSCs in children who require general anesthesia. Finally, a strong argument for the use of the SSC restoration is its cost effectiveness based on its durability and longevity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques.

            C Beznos (2015)
            This study evaluated the microleakage at the cervical margins of Class II composite resin restorations restored with different techniques. Slot cavities were prepared on both proximals of 40 unerupted third molars with one cervical margin located above and the other below the cementoenamel junction. The prepared teeth were randomly assigned to four groups and restored using the following techniques: (I) 3-Sited, (II) Directed-Shrinkage, (III) Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement or a (IV) Flowable Composite as the gingival increment. All restorations were placed with the same bonding agent and composite resin. The difference among the groups was on the first increment and on its insertion and polymerization techniques. After restoration, the teeth were thermocycled and exposed to a dye. Results showed that all the techniques worked well for enamel, with almost no leakage. However, on cementum, all techniques demonstrated moderate to severe leakage.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Fracture resistance of teeth restored with class II bonded composite resin.

              W S Eakle (1986)
              The purpose of this study was to determine whether composite resin bonded to enamel or to both enamel and dentin can increase the fracture resistance of teeth with Class II cavity preparations. Extracted maxillary pre-molars with MOD slot preparations were restored with composite resin bonded to enamel (P-30 and Enamel Bond) or composite resin bonded to enamel and dentin (P-30 and Scotch-bond). Teeth in a control group were prepared but left unrestored. All teeth were loaded occlusally in a universal testing machine until they fractured. Means of forces required to fracture teeth in each of the three groups were statistically compared (one-way ANOVA and Bonferroni t test). Teeth restored with combined enamel- and dentin-bonded composite resins were significantly more resistant to fracture than were similarly prepared but unrestored teeth and also than teeth restored with enamel-bonded composite resin (p less than 0.05). A significant difference was not demonstrated between the enamel-bonded group and the unrestored group. Further testing is needed to determine the durability of the bonds between tooth and restoration in the clinical setting.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Dent (Tehran)
                J Dent (Tehran)
                Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran)
                Tehran University of Medical Sciences
                1735-2150
                2008-2185
                20 December 2011
                Autumn 2011
                2011
                : 8
                : 4
                : 178-185
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                [2 ]Assistant Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
                [3 ]Dentist, Tehran, Iran
                [4 ]Assistant Professor, Department of Dental Materials, Shahid Beheshti University Of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
                Author notes
                Corresponding author: M. Bargrizan, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran majid.bargrizan@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                jod-8-178
                3320753
                22509457
                5f284acb-6ed3-412f-942a-30428d663d3e
                Copyright © Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 3.0 License (CC BY-NC 3.0), which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

                History
                : 12 April 2011
                : 21 September 2011
                Categories
                Original Article

                Dentistry
                zinc oxide eugenol,microleakage,composite
                Dentistry
                zinc oxide eugenol, microleakage, composite

                Comments

                Comment on this article