Blog
About

8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Uniformity and repeatability of normal resting myocardial blood flow in rats using [13N]-ammonia and small animal PET.

      Nuclear Medicine Communications

      Ammonia, diagnostic use, Animals, Body Size, Coronary Circulation, Coronary Vessels, physiology, radionuclide imaging, Male, Nitrogen Radioisotopes, Observer Variation, Positron-Emission Tomography, methods, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Reproducibility of Results, Rest

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate population variability, regional uniformity and repeatability of myocardial blood flow measurements using [13N]-ammonia and small animal PET. Serial PET scans were conducted on Sprague-Dawley rats using [13N]-ammonia to study relative perfusion and absolute myocardial blood flow (ml/min/g). FlowQuant automated analysis software was used to produce five-segment polar maps to investigate regional myocardial blood flow differences. The interobserver and intraobserver repeatability was assessed quantitatively using Bland-Altman analysis. Absolute myocardial blood flow values were 4.3 ± 1.1 ml/min/g, corresponding to a population variability of 25.5%. There were significant age-related increases in resting myocardial blood flow (r2=0.59, P<0.001). The test-retest differences had a coefficient of repeatability of 24.5% of the mean myocardial blood flow. The operator variability was small, relative to the population variability. Repeatable myocardial blood flow values are minimally influenced by operator intervention. However, age-related myocardial blood flow increases must be taken into account when comparing measurements between experimental groups.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          22692581
          10.1097/MNM.0b013e328355d8bc

          Comments

          Comment on this article