10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Participation and retention in the breast cancer screening program in New Brunswick Canada

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          New Brunswick (NB) Canada uses its breast cancer screening service program to assess the extent to which eligible NB women are complying with mammography guidelines. While many studies have investigated factors associated with participation in periodic breast cancer screening in Canada and elsewhere, most work has relied on self-reported surveys or smaller scale primary data collection. Using a longitudinal administrative dataset for NB over the period 1996–2011 of 255,789 eligible women aged 45–69, this study examined demographic, socioeconomic and geographic factors associated with initial participation in regular screening at age 50 and ongoing retention in the program. Logistic regression was used to examine correlates of initial screening, while rescreening participation was estimated using survival analysis accounting for rescreening episodes. Initial screening participation was lower for women born outside of NB, many women living farther away from screening centers, women in rural areas, and higher for married women. In contrast, retention was higher for rural women and women recently arrived in NB. For both participation and retention, regional disparities across health zone persisted after controlling for observable personal and locational factors. The analysis highlights important characteristics to be targeted to increase screening but also that how health zones operate their screening programs exerts a very significant effect on the use of screening services by eligible women. This offers lessons for the design and evaluation of any cancer screening program.

          Highlights

          • We analyze a linked longitudinal dataset on mammography screening from New Brunswick Canada.

          • Screening at entry into the screening program at age 50 was lower for immigrants and rural residents.

          • Rescreening conditional on previous screening was higher for rural residents and recent arrivals.

          • Regional disparities in screening rates across health zone remained after controlling for covariates.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Recommendations on screening for breast cancer in average-risk women aged 40-74 years.

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening.

            This study identified barriers and facilitators of repeat participation in mammography and breast physical examination among women ages 50 years and over. Telephone interviews were conducted with 910 women in this age group. Forty percent of respondents had never had a mammogram. Only 38% had had one in the past 12 months. Of women who had a prior mammogram, 43% had had only one. Only 60% of women had had a breast exam in the past 12 months. A physician recommendation was the single best predictor of adherence to mammography. However, only 60% of women reported that their physicians had ever recommended mammography. Several other barriers to mammography were revealed, including anxiety, embarrassment, and concerns about cost and radiation. Both a family history of breast cancer and heightened perceived vulnerability to breast cancer were associated positively with repeat mammography participation; anxiety about screening reduced the likelihood of this outcome. These findings suggest that physicians can play a powerful role in motivating women to participate in initial and subsequent breast cancer screening. Reassurance may reduce women's anxiety and embarrassment and increase utilization further.
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Cultural barriers to mammography, clinical breast exam, and breast self-exam among Chinese-American women 60 and older.

              This study examined screening utilization at least once and regular adherence to mammography, clinical breast exam, and breast self-exam among older Chinese-American women. One hundred women were recruited from senior centers in two metropolitan cities. Participants completed a questionnaire that included sections on demographics, health history, health insurance coverage, breast cancer screening, common and cultural barriers to screening, and acculturation. Logistic regression models found insurance coverage for mammography and acculturation to be significant predictors of having had a mammogram at least once. Low perceived need/lack of physician recommendation and recency of physical examination were significant predictors of having had a mammogram in the past year. Acculturation and modesty were significant predictors of having had a clinical breast exam at least once, while recency of physical examination was a significant predictor of having had a clinical breast exam in the past year. Reliance on medial professionals for screening and forgetting were significant predictors of having performed breast self-exam at least once, and forgetting was a significant predictor of regular performance of breast self-exam. These findings suggest that both common and cultural barriers play a role in breast cancer screening among older Chinese-American women, with cultural factors being more influential in the initiation of cancer screening behavior. Copyright 2000 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Prev Med Rep
                Prev Med Rep
                Preventive Medicine Reports
                Elsevier
                2211-3355
                23 March 2017
                June 2017
                23 March 2017
                : 6
                : 214-220
                Affiliations
                University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: Department of Economics, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada.Department of EconomicsUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonNBE3B 5A3Canada tedmcdon@ 123456unb.ca
                Article
                S2211-3355(17)30058-X
                10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.03.015
                5377004
                28377847
                5fa3f90c-f00a-4d71-8e65-e4a5fb3e7217
                © 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 29 June 2016
                : 13 March 2017
                : 20 March 2017
                Categories
                Regular Article

                breast cancer,mammography,socioeconomic status,cancer screening,administrative data

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log