3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Discussing proton pump inhibitor deprescribing: the views of Danish GPs and older patients

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Deprescribing of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can be considered in situations where the drug may no longer be necessary; however, this requires a careful discussion between patients and healthcare providers, often general practitioners (GPs). The aim of our study was to explore how GPs discuss PPI deprescribing with patients and compare that to how older patients would like to discuss this decision.

          Methods

          We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with GPs ( n = 11) and patients aged ≥65 years who were taking PPIs ( n = 4). Analysis of interviews was based on systematic text condensation.

          Results

          We identified four main themes: (1) Reasons PPI deprescribing comes up, (2) Considering PPI deprescribing, (3) Discussion topics, and (4) Incorporating patient preferences into PPI deprescribing decisions. We found that PPI deprescribing often comes up during consultations for other problems or due to concern about medication burden in general. GPs discussed topics related to symptom control, such as the possibility of rebound symptoms, the need to taper PPIs, and what to do if symptoms returned. This aligned with what patients felt was important to discuss. Some GPs routinely incorporated patient preferences into decisions, whereas others did not.

          Conclusion

          When discussing PPI deprescribing, the GPs in our study generally focused on topics related to symptom control. There was variability in how and if patient preferences were discussed. Greater focus may be needed on developing mechanisms to elicit and incorporate patient preferences into PPI deprescribing decisions. Future research could also explore more systematic approaches to reassess ongoing PPI use in an effort to curb unnecessary long-term use of PPIs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Prescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis

          Objective To synthesise qualitative studies that explore prescribers’ perceived barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) chronically prescribed in adults. Design A qualitative systematic review was undertaken by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL and INFORMIT from inception to March 2014, combined with an extensive manual search of reference lists and related citations. A quality checklist was used to assess the transparency of the reporting of included studies and the potential for bias. Thematic synthesis identified common subthemes and descriptive themes across studies from which an analytical construct was developed. Study characteristics were examined to explain differences in findings. Setting All healthcare settings. Participants Medical and non-medical prescribers of medicines to adults. Outcomes Prescribers’ perspectives on factors which shape their behaviour towards continuing or discontinuing PIMs in adults. Results 21 studies were included; most explored primary care physicians’ perspectives on managing older, community-based adults. Barriers and enablers to minimising PIMs emerged within four analytical themes: problem awareness; inertia secondary to lower perceived value proposition for ceasing versus continuing PIMs; self-efficacy in regard to personal ability to alter prescribing; and feasibility of altering prescribing in routine care environments given external constraints. The first three themes are intrinsic to the prescriber (eg, beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, skills, behaviour) and the fourth is extrinsic (eg, patient, work setting, health system and cultural factors). The PIMs examined and practice setting influenced the themes reported. Conclusions A multitude of highly interdependent factors shape prescribers’ behaviour towards continuing or discontinuing PIMs. A full understanding of prescriber barriers and enablers to changing prescribing behaviour is critical to the development of targeted interventions aimed at deprescribing PIMs and reducing the risk of iatrogenic harm.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An update on the clinical consequences of polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Too much medicine in older people? Deprescribing through shared decision making

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                wthomp01@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Fam Pract
                BMC Family Practice
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2296
                8 August 2020
                8 August 2020
                2020
                : 21
                : 160
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.10825.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, Research Unit of General Practice, , University of Southern Denmark, ; J.B. Winsløwsvej 9, 5000 Odense, Denmark
                [2 ]GRID grid.7143.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, Hospital Pharmacy Funen, , Odense University Hospital, ; Odense, Denmark
                [3 ]GRID grid.7143.1, ISNI 0000 0004 0512 5013, OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, , Odense University Hospital, ; Odense, Denmark
                [4 ]GRID grid.10825.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 0728 0170, Research Unit of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, , University of Southern Denmark, ; Odense, Denmark
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8268-4092
                Article
                1227
                10.1186/s12875-020-01227-5
                7415175
                32770959
                5fa5d276-e596-4b81-b3f8-b8ee049dca56
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 31 March 2020
                : 20 July 2020
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Medicine
                deprescribing,proton pump inhibitors,shared decision-making,communication
                Medicine
                deprescribing, proton pump inhibitors, shared decision-making, communication

                Comments

                Comment on this article