200
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      CT scanning for diagnosing blunt ureteral and ureteropelvic junction injuries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Blunt ureteral and ureteropelvic (UPJ) injuries are extremely rare and very difficult to diagnose. Many of these injuries are missed by the initial trauma evaluation.

          Methods

          Trauma registry data was used to identify all blunt trauma patients with ureteral or UPJ injuries, from 1 April 2001 to 30 November 2006. Demographics, injury information and outcomes were determined. Chart review was then performed to record initial clinical and all CT findings.

          Results

          Eight patients had ureteral or UPJ injuries. Subtle findings such as perinephric stranding and hematomas, and low density retroperitoneal fluid were evident on all initial scans, and prompted delayed excretory scans in 7/8 cases. As a result, ureteral and UPJ injuries were diagnosed immediately for these seven patients. These findings were initially missed in the eighth patient because significant associated visceral findings mandated emergency laparotomy. All ureteral and UPJ injuries have completely healed except for the case with the delay in diagnosis.

          Conclusion

          Most blunt ureteral and UPJ injuries can be identified if delayed excretory CT scans are performed based on initial CT findings of perinephric stranding and hematomas, or the finding of low density retroperitoneal fluid.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Traumatic ureteral injuries: a single institution experience validating the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale grading scale.

          Ureteral injuries are uncommon and challenging. In this study we report our institutional experience with ureteral injuries. We evaluated the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma-Organ Injury Scale (AAST-OIS) for ureteral injuries as a predictor of outcomes for complexity of repair, morbidity, mortality and associated injuries. We performed a retrospective, 120-month study (January 1992 to December 2002) at an urban, level I trauma center. In the 57 patients mean hospital Admission blood pressure +/- SD was 115 +/- 25 mm Hg, mean Revised Trauma Score was 7.38 +/- 0.84 and mean Injury Severity Score was 15 +/- 1.15. The mechanism of injury was penetrating in 55 cases (96.5%), including gunshot wound in 52 (54.5%) and stab wound in 2 (5.5%), and in blunt 2 of motor vehicle accidents (3.5%). The anatomical location was the left side in 33 cases (58%), right side in 23 (40%) and bilateral in 1 (2%). The distribution of injuries was proximal in 15 cases (26%), mid in 21 (37%) and distal in 21 (37%). Associated injuries were present in 56 patients (98%). An intraoperative diagnosis was made in 44 cases (77%). Of the patients 50 (88%) required complex repairs or an adjunct procedure, including a double pigtail stent in 33 (58%), ureteroureterostomy in 20 (35%), ureteroneocystostomy with a psoas hitch in 10 (18%), external diversion in 9 (16%), suprapubic cystostomy in 8 (14%), nephrostomy in 2 (3.5%), nephrectomy in 2 (3.5%) and ligation in 2 (3.5%). Injury grade was I to V in 5 (8%), 8 (13%), 13 (22.8%), 18 (31.6%) and 13 (22.8%) cases, respectively. Overall 51 patients (89%) survived. No deaths were related to ureteral injury. Renal salvage was achieved in 49 of the 51 surviving patients (96%). Ureteral injuries are uncommon. The complexity of repair and number of associated injuries increase with AAST-OIS injury grade. Mortality increases with AAST-OIS injury grade but it is not related to the ureteral injury. Excellent results can be achieved with complex techniques of primary repair, leading to renal salvage.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ureteral injuries from external violence: the 25-year experience at San Francisco General Hospital.

            We review our 25-year experience with traumatic ureteral injury, for which the approach to management differs from the far more common iatrogenic injury. Review of our trauma data base disclosed 36 patients with 38 ureteral injuries (33 penetrating [24 gunshot, 9 stab wounds] and 5 blunt) from 1977 to 2003, a period during which we treated approximately 4,000 traumatic genitourinary injuries. The site of injury was the upper ureter in 70%, mid in 8% and distal in 22%. Major intra-abdominal injuries were often associated, but hematuria and hypotension were not consistent findings (75% and 50%, respectively). Excretory urograms performed in 24 patients was diagnostic in only 40%. Computerized tomography and retrograde pyelogram were diagnostic in 4 of 4 and 1 of 1 injuries, respectively (100%). Overall, diagnosis was by radiographic findings in 13 of the 36 injuries (36%) and by laparotomy in 23 (64%). Management was with stenting in 2 patients, primary closure in 12, ureteroureterostomy in 12, ureteroneocystostomy in 5, transureteroureterostomy in 1, Boari flap in 1 and nephrectomy in 1. The complication rate was 18%. Although traumatic ureteral injury is rare these patients are often critically ill and delay in diagnosis will increase the risk of complications. Contrast enhanced imaging in patients who are not undergoing laparotomy for associated injury should not be limited to those with hematuria and hypotension since these are not entirely sensitive. Most injuries are short segment loss in the upper ureter and can be repaired with debridement and tension-free anastamosis.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ureteral trauma: preoperative studies neither predict injury nor prevent missed injuries.

              Ureteral injuries are uncommon, and the necessity, accuracy, and optimal use of perioperative testing remains unknown. Delays in diagnosis have also been associated with significant morbidity, including loss of renal function. The records of all patients (n = 20) admitted with ureteral injuries to two Level I trauma centers during a 5-year period were reviewed. Data collected included patient demographics, mechanism of injury, degree of associated injuries, and presence of gross or microscopic hematuria. The use of any pre- or intraoperative testing was specifically noted. The location of the ureteral injury was obtained from the operative notes. The morbidity and mortality associated with ureteral injuries in the primarily diagnosed and the delayed groups were assessed. Presenting signs and symptoms, diagnostic testing, and the urologic management of the patients in the delayed group were reviewed. All patients were men whose ages ranged from 15 to 72 years, with a mean age of 29. The mechanisms of injury were gunshot wounds in 15, stab wounds in 4, and blunt vehicular trauma in 1. Excluding other urologic injuries, the incidence of hematuria related to the ureteral injury alone was 53%. A total of 10 pre- and intraoperative studies were performed, only 2 demonstrated the ureteral injury. Seventeen patients had their injuries diagnosed primarily. In this group, the ureter was repaired by suturing and stenting in 12, suturing without a stent in 1 and ureterocystostomy in 4. Delayed diagnosis of their ureteral injuries occurred in three patients. All three missed injuries occurred in the upper portion of the left ureter. All ureters were successfully repaired. There were no mortalities in this group, nor did any patient require a nephrectomy. Direct visualization of the injury is the best and most accurate diagnostic modality in ureteral trauma. These results reinforce that a thorough exploration of all retroperitoneal hematomas after penetrating trauma remain an integral part of the total abdominal exploration for trauma.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                BMC Urol
                BMC Urology
                BioMed Central
                1471-2490
                2008
                7 February 2008
                : 8
                : 3
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Trauma Program and Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
                [2 ]Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada
                Article
                1471-2490-8-3
                10.1186/1471-2490-8-3
                2258295
                18257927
                5fb3102e-a36c-4c3d-89a3-a347d1c03dc3
                Copyright © 2008 Ortega et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 8 August 2007
                : 7 February 2008
                Categories
                Research Article

                Urology
                Urology

                Comments

                Comment on this article