12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The role of moral disengagement in the execution process.

      Law and human behavior
      Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Capital Punishment, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morals, Prisons, Psychology, Social, United States

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The present study tested the proposition that disengagement of moral self-sanctions enables prison personnel to carry out the death penalty. Three subgroups of personnel in penitentiaries located in three Southern states were assessed in terms of eight mechanisms of moral disengagement. The personnel included the execution teams that carry out the executions; the support teams that provide solace and emotional support to the families of the victims and the condemned inmate; and prison guards who have no involvement in the execution process. The executioners exhibited the highest level of moral, social, and economic justifications, disavowal of personal responsibility, and dehumanization. The support teams that provide the more humane services disavowed moral disengagement, as did the noninvolved guards but to a lesser degree than the support teams.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          16133946
          10.1007/s10979-005-4930-1

          Chemistry
          Adaptation, Psychological,Adult,Aged,Analysis of Variance,Capital Punishment,Cognition,Female,Humans,Male,Middle Aged,Morals,Prisons,Psychology, Social,United States

          Comments

          Comment on this article