131
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A FRET-Based Real-Time PCR Assay to Identify the Main Causal Agents of New World Tegumentary Leishmaniasis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In South America, various species of Leishmania are endemic and cause New World tegumentary leishmaniasis (NWTL). The correct identification of these species is critical for adequate clinical management and surveillance activities. We developed a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay and evaluated its diagnostic performance using 64 archived parasite isolates and 192 prospectively identified samples collected from individuals with suspected leishmaniasis enrolled at two reference clinics in Lima, Peru. The real-time PCR assay was able to detect a single parasite and provided unambiguous melting peaks for five Leishmania species of the Viannia subgenus that are highly prevalent in South America: L. ( V.) braziliensis, L. ( V.) panamensis, L. ( V.) guyanensis, L. ( V.) peruviana and L. ( V.) lainsoni. Using kinetoplastid DNA-based PCR as a gold standard, the real-time PCR had sensitivity and specificity values of 92% and 77%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of conventional tests such as microscopy, culture and the leishmanin skin test (LST). In addition, the real-time PCR identified 147 different clinical samples at the species level, providing an overall agreement of 100% when compared to multilocus sequence typing (MLST) data performed on a subset of these samples. Furthermore, the real-time PCR was three times faster and five times less expensive when compared to PCR - MLST for species identification from clinical specimens. In summary, this new assay represents a cost-effective and reliable alternative for the identification of the main species causing NWTL in South America.

          Author Summary

          Leishmaniasis is a neglected disease with more than two million new human infections annually worldwide. Tegumentary leishmaniasis, cutaneous and mucocutaneous, is mainly caused by five Leishmania species of the Viannia complex in South America. Different species can cause disease with similar symptoms but have dissimilar prognoses and may need different therapeutic regimens. Identification of Leishmania species traditionally relies on the multilocus enzyme electrophoresis (MLEE) assay, but it can only be applied to culture-positive samples and takes at least six weeks of intense laboratory work. A reliable and rapid assay for species identification can be a valuable tool. Molecular assays are the fastest and most accurate way to identify the etiological agents causing leishmaniasis. This paper describes a novel real-time PCR assay for identification of the five main species that cause tegumentary leishmaniasis in the New World. The assay correctly identified each of these five species of Leishmania directly from clinical samples. Because of its reliability, speed and simplicity, this assay could be used for species identification in routine laboratory diagnosis of leishmaniasis in endemic regions.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Current diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.

          Tegumentary leishmaniasis, comprising the cutaneous and mucocutaneous forms, is caused by at least 13 dermotropic species of protozoa of the genus Leishmania, most of which are prevalent in the New World. Although diseases in the Old and New Worlds share similar characteristics, the ultimate manifestations and severity are quite different, with more severe forms associated with mucosal lesions observed in the New World. For the diagnosis and treatment of leishmaniasis, differences based on clinical features, usefulness/sensitivity of diagnostic methods and therapeutic responses are mainly emphasized. We present a critical review of the diagnostic methods, their contribution and the necessity for their improvement/development, particularly in molecular diagnosis aimed at detection and species identification, as well as serodiagnosis. In addition to a review of the drugs currently utilized, we describe differences in their effectiveness in Old and New World leishmaniasis. HIV/Leishmania coinfection is also presented in the context of diagnosis and treatment.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of PCR assays for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis.

            Three PCR assays for diagnosing leishmaniasis were compared and validated against parasite cultures and microscopic evaluation of stained tissue smears using 92 specimens from suspected cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Israel and the West Bank. Samples from imported and locally acquired disease were examined. The kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) PCR showed the highest sensitivity (98.7%) of any assay, correctly diagnosing 77/78 of the confirmed positive samples, followed by the rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) PCR (71/78 positive, 91.0% sensitivity) and then the spliced leader mini-exon PCR (42/78 positive, 53.8% sensitivity). Either parasite culture or microscopy alone detected 62.8% (49/78) or 74.4% (58/78) of the positive specimens, respectively, while culture and microscopy together improved overall sensitivity to 83.3% (65/78). Except for the kDNA PCR that had six false positives, all other assays were 100% specific. Further, restriction enzyme analysis of the ITS1 PCR product enabled identification of 74.6% of the positive samples, which included strains of Leishmania major (50.9%), Leishmania tropica (47.2%), and the Leishmania braziliensis complex (1.9%). This suggests that a PCR using kDNA should be used for the diagnosis of CL and that an ITS1 PCR can be reliably used for the diagnosis of CL when rapid species identification is needed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Influence of Leishmania (Viannia) species on the response to antimonial treatment in patients with American tegumentary leishmaniasis.

              Pentavalent antimonials (SbV) are the first-line chemotherapy for American tegumentary leishmaniasis (ATL). There are, however, reports of the occurrence of treatment failure with these drugs. Few studies in Latin America have compared the response to SbV treatment in ATL caused by different Leishmania species. Clinical parameters and response to SbV chemotherapy were studied in 103 patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) in Peru. Leishmania isolates were collected before treatment and typed by multilocus polymerase-chain-reaction restriction fragment-length polymorphism analysis. The 103 isolates were identified as L. (Viannia) peruviana (47.6%), L. (V.) guyanensis (23.3%), L. (V.) braziliensis (22.3%), L. (V.) lainsoni (4.9%), L. (Leishmania) mexicana (1%), and a putative hybrid, L. (V.) braziliensis/L. (V.) peruviana (1%). L. (V.) guyanensis was most abundant in central Peru. Of patients infected with the 3 former species, 21 (21.9%) did not respond to SbV chemotherapy. The proportions of treatment failure (after 12 months of follow-up) were 30.4%, 24.5%, and 8.3% in patients infected with L. (V.) braziliensis, L. (V.) peruviana, and L. (V.) guyanensis, respectively. Infection with L. (V.) guyanensis was associated with significantly less treatment failure than L. (V.) braziliensis, as determined by multiple logistic regression analysis (odds ratio, 0.07 [95% confidence interval, 0.007-0.8]; P=.03). Leishmania species can influence SbV treatment outcome in patients with CL. Therefore, parasite identification is of utmost clinical importance, because it should lead to a species-oriented treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                PLoS Negl Trop Dis
                plos
                plosntds
                PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1935-2727
                1935-2735
                January 2013
                3 January 2013
                : 7
                : 1
                : e1956
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Parasitology, U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima, Peru
                [2 ]Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Quebec, Canada
                [3 ]Leishmaniasis Working Group, Instituto de Medicina Tropical ‘Alexander von Humboldt’, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
                [4 ]Hospital Militar Central, Lima, Perú
                [5 ]Microbiology, Immunology, and Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory Department, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America
                [6 ]Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, D.C., United States of America
                Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Israel
                Author notes

                The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Conceived and designed the experiments: PT JHN GM PCFG DJB. Performed the experiments: PT JHN MDS VS. Analyzed the data: PT JHN MDS VS CML GCB KAE AGL PCFG DJB. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AL GM MO. Wrote the paper: PT JHN GCB KAE AGL PCFG DJB.

                Article
                PNTD-D-11-01289
                10.1371/journal.pntd.0001956
                3536805
                23301111
                5fca33f3-39c6-4c1d-b78a-3d24e9721f34
                Copyright @ 2013

                This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 15 December 2011
                : 28 October 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                This study was funded by grants CO497_11_L1 and CO466_11_L1 of the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (AFHSC/GEIS) of the U.S. Department of Defense. Additionally, this work was supported by the training grant 2D43 TW007393 awarded to the U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6) by NIH/FIC. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Microbiology
                Protozoology
                Parastic Protozoans
                Leishmania
                Medicine
                Diagnostic Medicine
                Test Evaluation
                Infectious Diseases
                Neglected Tropical Diseases
                Leishmaniasis
                Parasitic Diseases
                Leishmaniasis

                Infectious disease & Microbiology
                Infectious disease & Microbiology

                Comments

                Comment on this article