10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Digging to the heart of things – An essay on patterns of diagnosis in traditional East Asian medicine: Comparing Chinese and Japanese systems

      research-article
      a , b , *
      Integrative Medicine Research
      Elsevier
      Acupuncture, Diagnostic patterns, Cultural differences

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Traditional East Asian Medical (TEAM) practice systems exhibit much variation. Little work has been done to study reasons for this variation. This essay explores cultural and historical explanations for how variety occurs by contrasting the use of two TEAM concepts in diagnosis in Chinese and Japanese systems.

          Methods

          Focussing on two important concepts, xin (heart) and shen (spirit), a literature review is performed to contrast how they developed, are understood and used in diagnosis in Chinese Traditional Chinese medicine, TCM, and Japanese Meridian Therapy, MT.

          Results

          While TCM texts describe many heart-related diagnoses, MT texts do not describe any. While TCM associates ‘ shen’ with the mind and emotions coupled with associated diagnoses, MT does neither. Historical and cultural reasons for these differences are identified.

          Conclusions

          In light of these findings, important questions arise about the nature of concepts and diagnoses in TEAM practice systems. They are not objective like biomedical constructs and diagnoses, nor are they clearly articulated and studied yet according to international standards. This suggests a range of research strategies that are needed. There are valid historical and cultural reasons for the differences we see between Japanese and Chinese TEAM systems. In light of these, further research is needed to elaborate and identify critical issues that are important for education, practice and research.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          DSM-IV subtypes of ADHD in a Chinese outpatient sample.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Modern researches on Blood Stasis syndrome 1989–2015

            Abstract Background: Blood Stasis syndrome (BSS) is one of the major syndromes in Traditional East Asia medicine (TEAM). Modern research of BSS began in the late1980s. Methods: We searched in PubMed for BSS-related articles published between 1989 and 2015. The publication information, study contents, and bibliometric indicators were documented and analyzed. Results: Most of the BSS-related studies were conducted by Chinese researchers in China. The number of publications on BSS-related increased rapidly in recent years, so did the quality of them. The disease diversity of BSS-related studies increased along with the number of publications. Yet the academic influence of them remained on average low; further, the diagnostic criteria of BSS were not uniform. Conclusions: BSS-related studies have increased in quantity and quality, but there are limitations to them which require improvement in research productivity and academic influence.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book Chapter: not found

              Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders,

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Integr Med Res
                Integr Med Res
                Integrative Medicine Research
                Elsevier
                2213-4220
                2213-4239
                18 November 2020
                June 2021
                18 November 2020
                : 10
                : 2
                : 100695
                Affiliations
                [a ]School of Health Sciences, Kristiania University College, Oslo, Norway
                [b ]Private Practice, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: The Japanese Acupuncture Centre, W G Plein 330, Amsterdam 1054 SG, the Netherlands. sjbirch@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                S2213-4220(20)30332-2 100695
                10.1016/j.imr.2020.100695
                7906889
                60272256-cffc-45a5-9208-4cf5713a32a8
                © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 22 August 2020
                : 9 November 2020
                : 13 November 2020
                Categories
                Original Article

                acupuncture,diagnostic patterns,cultural differences

                Comments

                Comment on this article