50
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Research training is essential in a modern undergraduate medical curriculum. Our evaluation aimed to (a) gauge students' awareness of research activities, (b) compare students' perceptions of their transferable and research-specific skills competencies, (c) determine students' motivation for research and (d) obtain students' personal views on doing research.

          Methods

          Undergraduate medical students ( N=317) completed a research skills questionnaire developed by the Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning in Applied Undergraduate Research Skills (CETL-AURS) at Reading University. The questionnaire assessed students' transferable skills, research-specific skills (e.g., study design, data collection and data analysis), research experience and attitude and motivation towards doing research.

          Results

          The majority of students are motivated to pursue research. Graduate entrants and male students appear to be the most confident regarding their research skills competencies. Although all students recognise the role of research in medical practice, many are unaware of the medical research activities or successes within their university. Of those who report no interest in a career incorporating research, a common perception was that researchers are isolated from patients and clinical practice.

          Discussion

          Students have a narrow definition of research and what it entails. An explanation for why research competence does not align more closely with research motivation is derived from students' lack of understanding of the concept of translational research, as well as a lack of awareness of the research activity being undertaken by their teachers and mentors. We plan to address this with specific research awareness initiatives.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review.

            Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the integration of the best research evidence with patients' values and clinical circumstances in clinical decision making. Teaching of EBP should be evaluated and guided by evidence of its own effectiveness. To appraise, summarize, and describe currently available EBP teaching evaluation instruments. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, HAPI, and ERIC databases; reference lists of retrieved articles; EBP Internet sites; and 8 education journals from 1980 through April 2006. For inclusion, studies had to report an instrument evaluating EBP, contain sufficient description to permit analysis, and present quantitative results of administering the instrument. Two raters independently abstracted information on the development, format, learner levels, evaluation domains, feasibility, reliability, and validity of the EBP evaluation instruments from each article. We defined 3 levels of instruments based on the type, extent, methods, and results of psychometric testing and suitability for different evaluation purposes. Of 347 articles identified, 115 were included, representing 104 unique instruments. The instruments were most commonly administered to medical students and postgraduate trainees and evaluated EBP skills. Among EBP skills, acquiring evidence and appraising evidence were most commonly evaluated, but newer instruments evaluated asking answerable questions and applying evidence to individual patients. Most behavior instruments measured the performance of EBP steps in practice but newer instruments documented the performance of evidence-based clinical maneuvers or patient-level outcomes. At least 1 type of validity evidence was demonstrated for 53% of instruments, but 3 or more types of validity evidence were established for only 10%. High-quality instruments were identified for evaluating the EBP competence of individual trainees, determining the effectiveness of EBP curricula, and assessing EBP behaviors with objective outcome measures. Instruments with reasonable validity are available for evaluating some domains of EBP and may be targeted to different evaluation needs. Further development and testing is required to evaluate EBP attitudes, behaviors, and more recently articulated EBP skills.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The clinical investigator as an endangered species.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Med Educ Online
                MEO
                Medical Education Online
                Medical Education Online
                1087-2981
                10 September 2010
                2010
                : 15
                : 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212
                Affiliations
                School of Medicine, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
                Author notes
                [* ] Louise N. Burgoyne, School of Medicine, Brookfield Health Sciences Complex, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. Email: l.burgoyne@ 123456ucc.ie
                [#]

                All authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                MEO-15-5212
                10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212
                2939395
                20844608
                60343c03-dd39-4ae0-a6f8-17aded962bd4
                © 2010 Louise N. Burgoyne et al.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 April 2010
                : 09 July 2010
                : 27 July 2010
                Categories
                Research Article

                Education
                research skills,training,translational research,scholarly activity programmes,undergraduate

                Comments

                Comment on this article