23
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Building access to specialist care through e-consultation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Limited access to specialist care remains a major barrier to health care in Canada, affecting patients and primary care providers alike, in terms of both long wait times and inequitable availability. We developed an electronic consultation system, based on a secure web-based tool, as an alternative to face-to-face consultations, and ran a pilot study to evaluate its effectiveness and acceptability to practitioners.

          Methods

          In a pilot program conducted over 15 months starting in January 2010, the e-consultation system was tested with primary care providers and specialists in a large health region in Eastern Ontario, Canada. We collected utilization data from the electronic system itself (including quantitative data from satisfaction surveys) and qualitative information from focus groups and interviews with providers.

          Results

          Of 18 primary care providers in the pilot program, 13 participated in focus groups and 9 were interviewed; in addition, 10 of the 11 specialists in the program were interviewed. Results of our evaluation showed good uptake, high levels of satisfaction, improvement in the integration of referrals and consultations, and avoidance of unnecessary specialist visits. A total of 77 e-consultation requests were processed from 1 Jan. 2010 to 1 Apr. 2011. Less than 10% of the referrals required face-to-face follow-up. The most frequently noted benefits for patients (as perceived by providers) included improved access to specialist care and reduced wait times. Primary care providers valued the ability to assist with patient assessment and management by having access to a rapid response to clinical questions, clarifying the need for diagnostic tests or treatments, and confirming the need for a formal consultation. Specialists enjoyed the improved interaction with primary care providers, as well as having some control in the decision on which patients should be referred.

          Interpretation

          This low-cost referral system has potential for broader implementation, once payment models for physicians are adapted to cover e-consultation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Designing and conduction mixed methods research

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine.

            N Hjelm (2004)
            Telemedicine is a vast subject, but as yet there are limited data on the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of most telemedicine applications. As a result, objective information about the benefits and drawbacks of telemedicine is limited. This review is therefore based mainly on preliminary results, opinions and predictions. Many potential benefits of telemedicine can be envisaged, including: improved access to information; provision of care not previously deliverable; improved access to services and increasing care delivery; improved professional education; quality control of screening programmes; and reduced health-care costs. Although telemedicine clearly has a wide range of potential benefits, it also has some disadvantages. The main ones that can be envisaged are: a breakdown in the relationship between health professional and patient; a breakdown in the relationship between health professionals; issues concerning the quality of health information; and organizational and bureaucratic difficulties. On balance, the benefits of telemedicine are substantial, assuming that more research will reduce or eliminate the obvious drawbacks.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Qualitative researcher and evaluation methods

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Open Med
                Open Med
                Open Med
                Open Medicine
                Open Medicine Publications, Inc.
                1911-2092
                2013
                8 January 2013
                : 7
                : 1
                : e1-e8
                Author notes
                Dr. Clare Liddy, 43 Bruyere St, Ottawa, ON K1N 5C8; CLiddy@ 123456bruyere.org
                Article
                OpenMed-07-e1-8
                3654501
                23687533
                60684735-1af0-4219-9358-191d2bc33fd3
                Copyright @ 2013

                Open Medicine applies the Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike License, which means that anyone is able to freely copy, download, reprint, reuse, distribute, display or perform this work and that authors retain copyright of their work. Any derivative use of this work must be distributed only under a license identical to this one and must be attributed to the authors. Any of these conditions can be waived with permission from the copyright holder. These conditions do not negate or supersede Fair Use laws in any country.

                History
                : 22 June 2012
                : 13 August 2012
                : 18 September 2012
                : 18 September 2012
                Categories
                Research

                Medicine
                Medicine

                Comments

                Comment on this article