58
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Early, Low-Level Auditory-Somatosensory Multisensory Interactions Impact Reaction Time Speed

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Several lines of research have documented early-latency non-linear response interactions between audition and touch in humans and non-human primates. That these effects have been obtained under anesthesia, passive stimulation, as well as speeded reaction time tasks would suggest that some multisensory effects are not directly influencing behavioral outcome. We investigated whether the initial non-linear neural response interactions have a direct bearing on the speed of reaction times. Electrical neuroimaging analyses were applied to event-related potentials in response to auditory, somatosensory, or simultaneous auditory–somatosensory multisensory stimulation that were in turn averaged according to trials leading to fast and slow reaction times (using a median split of individual subject data for each experimental condition). Responses to multisensory stimulus pairs were contrasted with each unisensory response as well as summed responses from the constituent unisensory conditions. Behavioral analyses indicated that neural response interactions were only implicated in the case of trials producing fast reaction times, as evidenced by facilitation in excess of probability summation. In agreement, supra-additive non-linear neural response interactions between multisensory and the sum of the constituent unisensory stimuli were evident over the 40–84 ms post-stimulus period only when reaction times were fast, whereas subsequent effects (86–128 ms) were observed independently of reaction time speed. Distributed source estimations further revealed that these earlier effects followed from supra-additive modulation of activity within posterior superior temporal cortices. These results indicate the behavioral relevance of early multisensory phenomena.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects.

          One of the most robust experience-related cortical dynamics is reduced neural activity when stimuli are repeated. This reduction has been linked to performance improvements due to repetition and also used to probe functional characteristics of neural populations. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are as yet unknown. Here, we consider three models that have been proposed to account for repetition-related reductions in neural activity, and evaluate them in terms of their ability to account for the main properties of this phenomenon as measured with single-cell recordings and neuroimaging techniques. We also discuss future directions for distinguishing between these models, which will be important for understanding the neural consequences of repetition and for interpreting repetition-related effects in neuroimaging data.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Is neocortex essentially multisensory?

            Although sensory perception and neurobiology are traditionally investigated one modality at a time, real world behaviour and perception are driven by the integration of information from multiple sensory sources. Mounting evidence suggests that the neural underpinnings of multisensory integration extend into early sensory processing. This article examines the notion that neocortical operations are essentially multisensory. We first review what is known about multisensory processing in higher-order association cortices and then discuss recent anatomical and physiological findings in presumptive unimodal sensory areas. The pervasiveness of multisensory influences on all levels of cortical processing compels us to reconsider thinking about neural processing in unisensory terms. Indeed, the multisensory nature of most, possibly all, of the neocortex forces us to abandon the notion that the senses ever operate independently during real-world cognition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neuronal oscillations and multisensory interaction in primary auditory cortex.

              Recent anatomical, physiological, and neuroimaging findings indicate multisensory convergence at early, putatively unisensory stages of cortical processing. The objective of this study was to confirm somatosensory-auditory interaction in A1 and to define both its physiological mechanisms and its consequences for auditory information processing. Laminar current source density and multiunit activity sampled during multielectrode penetrations of primary auditory area A1 in awake macaques revealed clear somatosensory-auditory interactions, with a novel mechanism: somatosensory inputs appear to reset the phase of ongoing neuronal oscillations, so that accompanying auditory inputs arrive during an ideal, high-excitability phase, and produce amplified neuronal responses. In contrast, responses to auditory inputs arriving during the opposing low-excitability phase tend to be suppressed. Our findings underscore the instrumental role of neuronal oscillations in cortical operations. The timing and laminar profile of the multisensory interactions in A1 indicate that nonspecific thalamic systems may play a key role in the effect.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Front Integr Neurosci
                Front. Integr. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
                Frontiers Research Foundation
                1662-5145
                08 January 2009
                11 March 2009
                2009
                : 3
                : 2
                Affiliations
                [1] 1The Functional Electrical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Neuropsychology and Neurorehabilitation Service and Radiology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne Lausanne, Switzerland
                [2] 2The Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Program in Cognitive Neuroscience and Schizophrenia, The Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research Orangeburg, NY, USA
                [3] 3Program in Cognitive Neuroscience, Departments of Psychology and Biology, City College of the City University of New York New York, NY, USA
                [4] 4The EEG Brain Mapping Core, Centre for Biomedical Imaging Lausanne and Geneva, Switzerland
                Author notes

                Edited by: Mark Wallace, Vanderbilt University, USA

                Reviewed by: Christoph Kayser, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Germany; Daniel Senkowski, Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany

                *Correspondence: Micah M. Murray, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Bugnon 46, Radiologie, BH08.078, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland. e-mail: micah.murray@ 123456chuv.ch
                Article
                10.3389/neuro.07.002.2009
                2659167
                19404410
                608510e6-ed15-4805-a971-8a9da084c23d
                Copyright © 2009 Sperdin, Cappe, Foxe and Murray.

                This is an open-access article subject to an exclusive license agreement between the authors and the Frontiers Research Foundation, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original authors and source are credited.

                History
                : 22 December 2008
                : 23 February 2009
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 72, Pages: 10, Words: 8724
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                multisensory,crossmodal,tactile,event-related potential,redundant signals effect,auditory,reaction time,somatosensory

                Comments

                Comment on this article