5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Confirmatory Composite Analysis

      methods-article

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article introduces confirmatory composite analysis (CCA) as a structural equation modeling technique that aims at testing composite models. It facilitates the operationalization and assessment of design concepts, so-called artifacts. CCA entails the same steps as confirmatory factor analysis: model specification, model identification, model estimation, and model assessment. Composite models are specified such that they consist of a set of interrelated composites, all of which emerge as linear combinations of observable variables. Researchers must ensure theoretical identification of their specified model. For the estimation of the model, several estimators are available; in particular Kettenring's extensions of canonical correlation analysis provide consistent estimates. Model assessment mainly relies on the Bollen-Stine bootstrap to assess the discrepancy between the empirical and the estimated model-implied indicator covariance matrix. A Monte Carlo simulation examines the efficacy of CCA, and demonstrates that CCA is able to detect various forms of model misspecification.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.

          This chapter presents a review of applications of structural equation modeling (SEM) published in psychological research journals in recent years. We focus first on the variety of research designs and substantive issues to which SEM can be applied productively. We then discuss a number of methodological problems and issues of concern that characterize some of this literature. Although it is clear that SEM is a powerful tool that is being used to great benefit in psychological research, it is also clear that the applied SEM literature is characterized by some chronic problems and that this literature can be considerably improved by greater attention to these issues.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                13 December 2018
                2018
                : 9
                : 2541
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Faculty of Engineering Technology, Chair of Product-Market Relations, University of Twente , Enschede, Netherlands
                [2] 2Nova Information Management School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa , Lisbon, Portugal
                [3] 3Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen , Groningen, Netherlands
                Author notes

                Edited by: Holmes Finch, Ball State University, United States

                Reviewed by: Daniel Saverio John Costa, University of Sydney, Australia; Shenghai Dai, Washington State University, United States

                *Correspondence: Florian Schuberth f.schuberth@ 123456utwente.nl

                This article was submitted to Quantitative Psychology and Measurement, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02541
                6300521
                30618962
                608a842c-8df7-4ff3-a91d-6d26d700a6d8
                Copyright © 2018 Schuberth, Henseler and Dijkstra.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 19 June 2018
                : 28 November 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 1, Equations: 9, References: 82, Pages: 14, Words: 9202
                Categories
                Psychology
                Methods

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                artifacts,composite modeling,design research,monte carlo simulation study,structural equation modeling,theory testing

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log