9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Challenges and Contradictions of Metal Nano-Particle Applications for Radio-Sensitivity Enhancement in Cancer Therapy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          From the very beginnings of radiotherapy, a crucial question persists with how to target the radiation effectiveness into the tumor while preserving surrounding tissues as undamaged as possible. One promising approach is to selectively pre-sensitize tumor cells by metallic nanoparticles. However, though the “physics” behind nanoparticle-mediated radio-interaction has been well elaborated, practical applications in medicine remain challenging and often disappointing because of limited knowledge on biological mechanisms leading to cell damage enhancement and eventually cell death. In the present study, we analyzed the influence of different nanoparticle materials (platinum (Pt), and gold (Au)), cancer cell types (HeLa, U87, and SKBr3), and doses (up to 4 Gy) of low-Linear Energy Transfer (LET) ionizing radiation (γ- and X-rays) on the extent, complexity and reparability of radiation-induced γH2AX + 53BP1 foci, the markers of double stand breaks (DSBs). Firstly, we sensitively compared the focus presence in nuclei during a long period of time post-irradiation (24 h) in spatially (three-dimensionally, 3D) fixed cells incubated and non-incubated with Pt nanoparticles by means of high-resolution immunofluorescence confocal microscopy. The data were compared with our preliminary results obtained for Au nanoparticles and recently published results for gadolinium (Gd) nanoparticles of approximately the same size (2–3 nm). Next, we introduced a novel super-resolution approach—single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM)—to study the internal structure of the repair foci. In these experiments, 10 nm Au nanoparticles were used that could be also visualized by SMLM. Altogether, the data show that different nanoparticles may or may not enhance radiation damage to DNA, so multi-parameter effects have to be considered to better interpret the radiosensitization. Based on these findings, we discussed on conclusions and contradictions related to the effectiveness and presumptive mechanisms of the cell radiosensitization by nanoparticles. We also demonstrate that SMLM offers new perspectives to study internal structures of repair foci with the goal to better evaluate potential differences in DNA damage patterns.

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Relevance of breast cancer cell lines as models for breast tumours: an update.

          The number of available breast cancer cell (BCC) lines is small, and only a very few of them have been extensively studied. Whether they are representative of the tumours from which they originated remains a matter of debate. Whether their diversity mirrors the well-known inter-tumoural heterogeneity is another essential question. While numerous similarities have long been found between cell lines and tumours, recent technical advances, including the use of micro-arrays and comparative genetic analysis, have brought new data to the discussion. This paper presents most of the BCC lines that have been described in some detail to date. It evaluates the accuracy of the few of them widely used (MCF-7, T-47D, BT-474, SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-231, Hs578T) as tumour models. It is concluded that BCC lines are likely to reflect, to a large extent, the features of cancer cells in vivo. The importance of oestrogen receptor-alpha (gene ESR1 ) and Her-2/ neu ( ERBB2 ) as classifiers for cell lines and tumours is underlined. The recourse to a larger set of cell lines is suggested since the exact origin of some of the widely used lines remains ambiguous. Investigations on additional specific lines are expected to improve our knowledge of BCC and of the dialogue that these maintain with their surrounding normal cells in vivo.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Insight into nanoparticle cellular uptake and intracellular targeting.

            Collaborative efforts from the fields of biology, materials science, and engineering are leading to exciting progress in the development of nanomedicines. Since the targets of many therapeutic agents are localized in subcellular compartments, modulation of nanoparticle-cell interactions for efficient cellular uptake through the plasma membrane and the development of nanomedicines for precise delivery to subcellular compartments remain formidable challenges. Cellular internalization routes determine the post-internalization fate and intracellular localization of nanoparticles. This review highlights the cellular uptake routes most relevant to the field of non-targeted nanomedicine and presents an account of ligand-targeted nanoparticles for receptor-mediated cellular internalization as a strategy for modulating the cellular uptake of nanoparticles. Ligand-targeted nanoparticles have been the main impetus behind the progress of nanomedicines towards the clinic. This strategy has already resulted in remarkable progress towards effective oral delivery of nanomedicines that can overcome the intestinal epithelial barrier. A detailed overview of the recent developments in subcellular targeting as a novel platform for next-generation organelle-specific nanomedicines is also provided. Each section of the review includes prospects, potential, and concrete expectations from the field of targeted nanomedicines and strategies to meet those expectations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Tumor-selective delivery of macromolecular drugs via the EPR effect: background and future prospects.

              This paper briefly documents the history of the discovery of the EPR (enhanced permeability and retention) effect and elucidates an analogy between bacterial infection involving proteases that trigger kinin generation and cancer. The EPR effect of macromolecules in cancer tissues is defined, and the distinction between the EPR effect (with reference to clearance of macromolecules from the interstitial space of tumor tissues) and the simple passive targeting of drugs to tumors is described. Additional points of discussion include the uniqueness of tumor vessels, the influence of kinin and other vascular mediators such as nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins, and the heterogeneity of the EPR effect. Two different strategies to augment the EPR effect that were discovered are elevating blood pressure artificially via slow infusion of angiotensin II and applying nitroglycerin or other NO donors. Use of the nitroagent increased not only the blood flow of the tumor, but also the delivery of drug to the tumor and the drug's therapeutic effect. This finding shows an intriguing analogy to hypoxic cardiac infarct tissue, in that both are improved by NO. These two methods were applied to treatment of rodents and human cancers, in combination with other anticancer agents, with successful results achieved in rodents as well as humans. These data suggest very appealing prospects for utilization of the EPR effect in future development of cancer therapeutics.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                30 January 2019
                February 2019
                : 20
                : 3
                : 588
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, v.v.i., Kralovopolska 135, 612 65 Brno, Czech Republic; pagacova@ 123456ibp.cz (E.P.); StefancikovaL@ 123456seznam.cz (L.S.); depesd26@ 123456gmail.com (D.D.); kopecna@ 123456ibp.cz (O.K.); ivafalk@ 123456ibp.cz (I.F.)
                [2 ]Institute des Sciences Moléculaires d’Orsay (ISMO), Université Paris Saclay, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France; sandrine.lacombe@ 123456u-psud.fr (S.L.); erika.porcel@ 123456u-psud.fr (E.P.)
                [3 ]Kirchhoff-Institute for Physics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 227, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; franzschmidtkaler@ 123456web.de (F.S.-K.); hilden@ 123456kip.uni-heidelberg.de (G.H.); jin-ho.lee@ 123456kip.uni-heidelberg.de (J.-H.L.)
                [4 ]Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, 68159 Mannheim, Germany; Frederik.Wenz@ 123456medma.uni-heidelberg.de
                [5 ]Brno University of Technology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Technická 3082/12, 61600 Brno, Czech Republic; tomasvicar@ 123456gmail.com
                [6 ]German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; f.bestvater@ 123456dkfz.de
                [7 ]Institute UTINAM, UMR CNRS 6213-Université de Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25020 Besançon Cedex, France; stephane.roux@ 123456univ-fcomte.fr
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: hausmann@ 123456kip.uni-heidelberg.de (M.H.); falk@ 123456ibp.cz (M.F.); Tel.: +49-6221-549824 (M.H.); +420-541517116 (M.F.)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1992-6025
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3334-9201
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9430-1987
                Article
                ijms-20-00588
                10.3390/ijms20030588
                6387067
                30704035
                6091167d-c8c9-4f12-8125-ad003bc9850b
                © 2019 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 17 January 2019
                : 24 January 2019
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                metal nanoparticles,cancer radiotherapy,tumor cell radiosensitization,dna damage,dna repair,dna double strand breaks (dsbs),super-resolution microscopy,single-molecule localization microscopy (smlm),dna repair foci,damage to lysosomes

                Comments

                Comment on this article