16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A quick look at what is happening in the corporate world makes it clear that the stakeholder idea is alive, well, and flourishing; and the question now is not “if ” but “how” stakeholder theory will meet the challenges of its success. Does stakeholder theory’s “arrival” mean continued dynamism, refinement, and relevance, or stasis? How will superior stakeholder theory continue to develop? In light of these and related questions, the authors of these essays conducted an ongoing dialogue on the current state and future of stakeholder thinking. Beginning with a review of research and theory that has developed since the major stakeholder theorizing efforts of the 1990s, the authors individually offer their perspectives on the key issues relevant today to stakeholder thinking, and to suggest possible approaches that might lead toward and enable the continuing development of superior stakeholder theory.

          Related collections

          Most cited references36

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Visualization of an Oxygen-deficient Bottom Water Circulation in Osaka Bay, Japan

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              What Stakeholder Theory is Not

              The term stakeholder is a powerful one. This is due, to a significant degree, to its conceptual breadth. The term means different things to different people and hence evokes praise or scorn from a wide variety of scholars and practitioners. Such breadth of interpretation, though one of stakeholder theory’s greatest strengths, is also one of its most prominent theoretical liabilities. The goal of the current paper is like that of a controlled burn that clears away some of the underbrush of misinterpretation in the hope of denying easy fuel to the critical conflagration that would raze the theory. We aim to narrow its technical meaning for greater facility of use in management and organizational studies. By elaborating a number of common misinterpretations – critical and friendly – of the theory, we hope to render a stronger and more convincing theory as a starting place for future research.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                applab
                Business Ethics Quarterly
                Bus. Ethics Q.
                Philosophy Documentation Center
                1052-150X
                2153-3326
                April 2008
                January 2015
                : 18
                : 02
                : 153-190
                Article
                10.5840/beq200818214
                60a77495-67ff-48f1-82ff-1417d6d85255
                © 2008
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article