42
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Genetic Polymorphisms Influence the Ovarian Response to rFSH Stimulation in Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization Programs with ICSI

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Obtaining an adequate number of high-quality oocytes is a major challenge in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). To date, a range of hormonal and clinical parameters have been used to optimize COH but none have significant predictive value. This variability could be due to the genetic predispositions of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Here, we assessed the individual and combined impacts of thirteen SNPs that reportedly influence the outcome of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) on the ovarian response to rFSH stimulation for patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection program (ICSI).

          Results

          Univariate analysis revealed that only FSHR, ESR2 and p53 SNPs influenced the number of mature oocytes. The association was statistically significant for FSHR (p=0.0047) and ESR2 (0.0017) in the overall study population and for FSHR (p=0.0009) and p53 (p=0.0048) in subgroup that was more homogeneous in terms of clinical variables. After Bonferroni correction and a multivariate analysis, only the differences for FSHR and ESR2 polymorphisms were still statistically significant. In a multilocus analysis, only the FSHR and AMH SNP combination significantly influenced oocyte numbers in both population (p<0.01).

          Discussion

          We confirmed the impact of FSHR and ESR2 polymorphisms on the IVF outcome. Furthermore, we showed for the first time that a p53 polymorphism (which is already known to impact embryo implantation) could influence the ovarian response. However, given that this result lost its statistical significance after multivariate analysis, more data are needed to draw firm conclusions. Only the FSHR and AMH polymorphism combination appears to influence mature oocyte numbers but this finding also needs to be confirmed.

          Materials and Methods

          A 13 gene polymorphisms: FSHR(Asn680Ser), p53(Arg72Pro), AMH(Ile49Ser), ESR2(+1730G>A), ESR1(−397T>C), BMP15(−9C>G), MTHFR1(677C>T), MTHFR2(1298A>C), HLA-G(−725C>G), VEGF(+405G>C), TNFα(−308A>G), AMHR(−482 A>G), PAI-1 (4 G/5 G), multiplex PCR assay was designed to genotype women undergoing ICSI program. We analyzed the overall study population (n=427) and a subgroup with homogeneous characteristics (n=112).

          Related collections

          Most cited references66

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          Conspectus florae Graecae / auctore E. de Halácsy.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Regulation of ovarian function: the role of anti-Müllerian hormone.

            Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), also known as Müllerian inhibiting substance, is a member of the transforming growth factor beta superfamily of growth and differentiation factors. In contrast to other members of the family, which exert a broad range of functions in multiple tissues, the principal function of AMH is to induce regression of the Müllerian ducts during male sex differentiation. However, the patterns of expression of AMH and its type II receptor in the postnatal ovary indicate that AMH may play an important role in ovarian folliculogenesis. This review describes several in vivo and in vitro studies showing that AMH participates in two critical selection points of follicle development: it inhibits the recruitment of primordial follicles into the pool of growing follicles and also decreases the responsiveness of growing follicles to FSH.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Anti-Müllerian hormone attenuates the effects of FSH on follicle development in the mouse ovary.

              Although ovarian follicle growth is under the influence of many growth factors and hormones of which FSH remains one of the most prominent regulators. Therefore, factors affecting the sensitivity of ovarian follicles to FSH are also important for follicle growth. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) has an inhibitory effect on follicle growth by decreasing the sensitivity of ovarian follicles to FSH. Furthermore, the combined action of AMH and FSH on ovarian follicle development was examined. Three different experiments were performed. Using an in vitro follicle culture system it was shown that FSH-stimulated preantral follicle growth is attenuated in the presence of AMH. This observation was confirmed by an in vivo experiment showing that in immature AMH-deficient females, more follicles start to grow under the influence of exogenous FSH than in their wild-type littermates. In a third experiment, examination of the follicle population of 4-month-old wild-type, FSH beta-, AMH-, and AMH-/FSH beta-deficient females revealed that loss of FSH expression has no impact on the number of primordial and preantral follicles, but the loss of inhibitory action of AMH on the recruitment of primordial follicles in AMH-deficient mice is increased in the absence of FSH. In conclusion, these studies show that AMH inhibits FSH-stimulated follicle growth in the mouse, suggesting that AMH is one of the factors determining the sensitivity of ovarian follicles for FSH and that AMH is a dominant regulator of early follicle growth.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1932-6203
                2012
                11 June 2012
                : 7
                : 6
                : e38700
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Reproductive Biology, Cytogenetics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Poissy Saint Germain Medical Centre, Poissy, France
                [2 ]EA 2493, Versailles Saint Quentin University, Versailles, France
                [3 ]Department of Reproductive Biology, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France
                Clermont Université, France
                Author notes

                Conceived and designed the experiments: PM JS FV. Performed the experiments: RB FV. Analyzed the data: RB FV. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RB ST FV. Wrote the paper: RB FV. Revised manuscript for intellectual content: M. Benahmed PM JS. Included patients: DMG JS FV. Performed IVF program: AT M. Bailly M. Bergere FB RW.

                Article
                PONE-D-12-01125
                10.1371/journal.pone.0038700
                3372493
                22701696
                60abb691-ab65-4a74-8054-845d755f9b8d
                Boudjenah et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 12 January 2012
                : 11 May 2012
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology
                Genetics
                Population Genetics
                Genetic Polymorphism
                Population Biology
                Population Genetics
                Genetic Polymorphism
                Medicine
                Anatomy and Physiology
                Endocrine System
                Endocrine Physiology
                Reproductive Endocrinology
                Clinical Genetics
                Genetic Counseling
                Clinical Immunology
                Immunologic Subspecialties
                Drugs and Devices
                Pharmacogenetics
                Endocrinology
                Endocrine Physiology
                Hormones
                Reproductive Endocrinology

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article