1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Case Demonstrating the Ribaroxaban Therapy for Paradoxical Embolism

      case-report
      a , b , a , c , a
      Cardiology Research
      Elmer Press
      Paradoxical embolism, Ribaroxaban, PFO, VTE, DOACs

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A paradoxical embolism is defined as a systemic arterial embolus due to passage of a venous thrombus through a right to left shunt. In recent years, vitamin K antagonists and aspirin are used as anticoagulant medications for the secondary prevention of paradoxical embolism. We describe a case of subacute right upper limb ischemia due to paradoxical embolism. We first started treatment with urokinase, intravenous (IV) injection and unfractionated heparin (continuous IV). As her condition and the serum D-dimer level showed improvement, we started catheterization on day 7 after admission; however the right brachial artery thrombus did not disappear. For her outpatient care, based on the viewpoint of providing rapid anticoagulation therapy within the therapeutic range, having longest periods of initial intensive therapy we chose the treatment using ribaroxaban. Recanalization of her right brachial artery was achieved with this therapy. Here, we report the effective results of initial intensive therapy using ribaroxaban for paradoxical embolism.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Incidence and Size of Patent Foramen Ovale During the First 10 Decades of Life: An Autopsy Study of 965 Normal Hearts

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            New oral anticoagulants: comparative pharmacology with vitamin K antagonists.

            New oral anticoagulants (OACs) that directly inhibit Factor Xa (FXa) or thrombin have been developed for the long-term prevention of thromboembolic disorders. These novel agents provide numerous benefits over older vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) due to major pharmacological differences. VKAs are economical and very well characterized, but have important limitations that can outweigh these advantages, such as slow onset of action, narrow therapeutic window and unpredictable anticoagulant effect. VKA-associated dietary precautions, monitoring and dosing adjustments to maintain international normalized ratio (INR) within therapeutic range, and bridging therapy, are inconvenient for patients, expensive, and may result in inappropriate use of VKA therapy. This may lead to increased bleeding risk or reduced anticoagulation and increased risk of thrombotic events. The new OACs have rapid onset of action, low potential for food and drug interactions, and predictable anticoagulant effect that removes the need for routine monitoring. FXa inhibitors, e.g. rivaroxaban and apixaban, are potent, oral direct inhibitors of prothrombinase-bound, clot-associated or free FXa. Both agents have a rapid onset of action, a wide therapeutic window, little or no interaction with food and other drugs, minimal inter-patient variability, and display similar pharmacokinetics in different patient populations. Since both are substrates, co-administration of rivaroxaban and apixaban with strong cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and permeability glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors and inducers can result in substantial changes in plasma concentrations due to altered clearance rates; consequently, their concomitant use is contraindicated and caution is required when used concomitantly with strong CYP3A4 and P-gp inducers. Although parenteral oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs), such as argatroban and bivalirudin, have been on the market for years, DTIs such as dabigatran are novel synthetic thrombin antagonists. Dabigatran etexilate is a low-molecular-weight non-active pro-drug that is administered orally and converted rapidly to its active form, dabigatran--a potent, competitive and reversible DTI. Dabigatran has an advantage over the indirect thrombin inhibitors, unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin, in that it inhibits free and fibrin-bound thrombin. The reversible binding of dabigatran may provide safer and more predictable anticoagulant treatment than seen with irreversible, non-covalent thrombin inhibitors, e.g. hirudin. Dabigatran shows a very low potential for drug-drug interactions. However, co-administration of dabigatran etexilate with other anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents can increase the bleeding risk. Although the new agents are pharmacologically better than VKAs--particularly in terms of fixed dosing, rapid onset of action, no INR monitoring and lower risk of drug interactions--there are some differences between them: the bioavailability of dabigatran is lower than rivaroxaban and apixaban, and so the dabigatran dosage required is higher; lower protein binding of dabigatran reduces the variability related to albuminaemia. The risk of metabolic drug-drug interactions also appears to differ between OACs: VKAs > rivaroxaban > apixaban > dabigatran. The convenience of the new OACs has translated into improvements in efficacy and safety as shown in phase III randomized trials. The new anticoagulants so far offer the greatest promise and opportunity for the replacement of VKAs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran.

              For many patients with venous thromboembolism, secondary prevention with vitamin K antagonists is not extended beyond six months, since the risk of recurrence may be outweighed by the risk of major bleeding. In a double-blind, multicenter trial, we randomly assigned 1233 patients with venous thromboembolism who had undergone six months of anticoagulant therapy to extended secondary prevention with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran (24 mg) or placebo, taken twice daily, for 18 months without monitoring of coagulation. At base line, bilateral ultrasonography of the legs and perfusion lung scanning were performed. Data from 612 patients in the ximelagatran group and 611 in the placebo group were analyzed. The occurrence of the primary end point, symptomatic recurrent venous thromboembolism, was confirmed in 12 patients assigned to ximelagatran and 71 patients assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.30; P<0.001). Death from any cause occurred in 6 patients in the ximelagatran group and 7 patients in the placebo group, and bleeding occurred in 134 patients and 111 patients, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.93 to 1.53; P=0.17). The incidence of major hemorrhage was low (six events in the ximelagatran group and five in the placebo group), and none of these hemorrhages were fatal. The cumulative risk of a transient elevation of the alanine aminotransferase level to more than three times the upper limit of normal was 6.4 percent in the ximelagatran group, as compared with 1.2 percent in the placebo group (P<0.001). Oral ximelagatran was superior to placebo for the extended prevention of venous thromboembolism. There was no significant increase in the frequency of bleeding complications, but there was an increase in the number of patients with a transient elevation in the alanine aminotransferase level. Copyright 2003 Massachusetts Medical Society
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cardiol Res
                Cardiol Res
                Elmer Press
                Cardiology Research
                Elmer Press
                1923-2829
                1923-2837
                February 2019
                24 February 2019
                : 10
                : 1
                : 63-67
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan
                [b ]Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
                Author notes
                [c ]Corresponding Author: Kazuhiro Shimizu, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Sakura Medical Center, Chiba, Japan. Email: k432@ 123456sakura.med.toho-u.ac.jp
                Article
                10.14740/cr840
                6396799
                30834062
                60ba5bb0-e3e9-4f61-aaf1-5bc2e947e2b4
                Copyright 2019, Aikawa et al.

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 30 January 2019
                : 7 February 2019
                Categories
                Case Report

                paradoxical embolism,ribaroxaban,pfo,vte,doacs
                paradoxical embolism, ribaroxaban, pfo, vte, doacs

                Comments

                Comment on this article