4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Direct-current-based image reconstruction versus direct-current included or excluded frequency-domain reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography.

      1 , , ,
      Applied optics

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We study the level of image artifacts in optical tomography associated with measurement uncertainty under three reconstruction configurations, namely, by using only direct-current (DC), DC-excluded frequency-domain, and DC-included frequency-domain data. Analytic and synthetic studies demonstrate that, at the same level of measurement uncertainty typical to optical tomography, the ratio of the standard deviation of mu(a) over mu(a) reconstructed by DC only is at least 1.4 times lower than that by frequency-domain methods. The ratio of standard deviations of D (or mu(s)') over D (or mu(s)') reconstructed by DC only are slightly lower than those by frequency-domain methods. Frequency-domain reconstruction including DC generally outperforms that excluding DC, but as the amount of measurements increases, the difference between the two diminishes. Under the condition of a priori structural information, the performances of three reconstruction configurations are seemingly equivalent.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Appl Opt
          Applied optics
          1539-4522
          1559-128X
          Jun 01 2010
          : 49
          : 16
          Affiliations
          [1 ] School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA.
          Article
          199703
          20517376
          60bf0c65-f9f6-4c0c-bf7e-0d4b9d421d17
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article